This may be the most controversial post that I've ever written, but I think that this has to be said about the violent clash in Charlottesville, Virginia. Fifty years ago a similar situation was developing in Skokie, Illinois. About 30 Members of the National Socialist Party of America (Nazis) wanted to march in full Nazi garb through the streets of Skokie. At the time Skokie was a predominantly Jewish suburb just north of Chicago. Approximately 5000 Holocaust survivors lived there. Skokie refused issuing a permit and the Nazis, supported by the ACLU, took this all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found in favor of the First Amendment rights of the Nazis by a 6-3 vote with conservative judges (Burger, Stewart, and Rehnquist) dissenting. The Nazis then decided not to march in Skokie, but did march in Chicago with little fanfare. No Jewish thugs showed up to fight and the event is remembered more for the Supreme Court decision rather than the event itself.
Today August 12, 2017 a group of white supremacist thugs from all over the country obtained a permit by court decision, to march and protest the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee from Emancipation Park, formerly Lee Park, in Charlottesville, Virginia. The night before, they marched through the University of Virginia campus with tiki torches, but with little violence. Unfortunately Saturday had a different result. Left wing thugs from far left organizations, some of which sponsored by George Soros like Black Lives Matter, were bussed in to protest the protestors. They did not have a permit. The white supremacists must have been aware that there was a possibility for violence as they arrived with, guns, shields, and sticks ready for battle. The left wing thugs seemed to be armed with bats and sticks as well, as both groups anticipated a violent confrontation. It is impossible to say which side initiated the violence, but once it erupted, the police banned the rally before it arrived at that park and directed them to a larger park. The march was filled with violence and culminated with an automobile deliberately crashing into a crowd of protestors killing one and sending nine others to the hospital. The driver may have been a deranged supremacist from Ohio.
A lesson could be learned from history. If the left wing thugs didn't show up there would had been little if any violence and the event may not have even made the news, as every one knows that the white supremacists are a bunch of deranged haters. But when you have deranged haters on the right and deranged haters on the left getting together, violent confrontation is inevitable.
The MSM and scrum bag Virginia governor Terry McAuliff, as expected, blamed President Trump and the white supremacists, eventhough it takes two to tango. In general the white supremacists were blamed and the left wing haters ignored. President Trump seemed to blame both sides. If anything, George Soros deserves some of the blame, but I'm the only person from whom you will hear this. Another example of the double standard by the MSM.
To be perfectly honest, I know a little a about protesting a protest that could have turned violent. In 1972, while a medical student at St. Louis University, I learned of an anti Israel protest at my campus student union. The local SDS chapter organized a protest by local Arab students against the Israeli victory in the recent war. The SDS chapter and many of the Arabs were students at Washington University in St. Louis. Washington University had a large number of Jewish students and was located in what was then a mostly Jewish suburb, University City. They decided that protesting there would be a mistake, as it would have definitely affected their reputation as they were well tolerated at the time at Washington University . A fellow Jewish medical student and I decided to see what this was all about and headed for the student union to await the arrival of the protestors. A group about twenty to thirty Arabs showed up along with a handful of ragged appearing SDSers carrying signs that I considered obscene with swastikas and cartoons comparing Israelis to Nazis. My friend and I looked at each other, grabbed a sign from an Arab and ripped it off its stick. We then tried to run the protesters out of the student union. Before any of the Arabs or SDSers got hurt, the campus cops arrived and ran them off campus as none were students or faculty members. Obviously it was a mistake on our part to confront these idiots as most students at St. Louis University could have cared less. Now that I'm older and wiser, I have seen the futility of our efforts as it could have turned a non event into something that made the 6 o'clock news.
In summary a group of bussed in white supremacist thugs obtained a permit for a protest and a bunch of bussed in left wing thugs, some of whom were sponsored by George Soros, had a violent confrontation in Charolettesville, Virginia. One person was murdered by a young thug using his automobile as a weapon. The MSM and corrupt Governor McAuliff were quick to blame the white supremacist thugs and President Trump, completely ignoring the left. President Trump correctly blamed both sides. Extremists from both ends of the spectrum, like Crypts and Bloods, don't play well together. First Amendment rights do not give anyone the right to beat the crap out of anyone else or destroy someone else's property.
Sunday, August 13, 2017
Thursday, August 3, 2017
The Russia Hoax and More
I had thought that I could avoid writing about the whole Russia thing, but it seems to have gotten out of hand, so my take might be worthwhile. I apologize for the length of this article, but events continue to happen on an almost daily basis so I keep adding.
The Democrats needed some sort of excuse as to why their terrible candidate lost the presidential election and so it was decided that the Russians who at best has an unfriendly relationship with America would serve as the whipping boy. Obama had always been an expert on dirty tricks to get elected and since he hates President Trump, he offered his team's expertise. He had double crossed his political mentor, communist Alice Palmer, to obtain an Illinois state senate seat. Then, with the aid of David Axelrod, managed to get both his primary and general election rival candidates to drop their candidacy by having someone commit crimes to unseal and report sealed divorce and child custody records.
Attempting to gain information about candidates and elections goes on all the time. I'm certain that the CIA participates in this soft of spying routinely, but Obama and the Clinton took this to another level. During the 1999 elections in Israel, Clinton sent three of his top campaign advisors to Israel to help Labor Party candidate Ehud Barak attempt to defeat Benjamin Netanyahu. They included James Carville, Robert Schrum, and Stanley Greenberg. They failed. In 2015, Obama's head of field operation during the 2012 election, was hired by OneVoice, a left wing Israeli group, to defeat Netanyahu. They were also given $350,000 American taxpayer dollars earmarked for the peace process, but spent instead to try to oust Netanyahu. I have recently told you about the Obama regime's efforts to fund antigovernment activities in Macedonia. Obama, via USAID, sent most of the funding through the US embassy in Skopje and $9.6 million pledged by USAID to the George Soros sponsored Foundation Open Society Macedonia. (Look for an update soon.) Soros wants to change the right leaning government with low taxes, friendship to Israel, right to life policies, and a fence to keep out middle eastern refugees into a Muslim-socialist country getting backing not only from the US, but all of its neighbors including Muslim Albania and Kosovo and Bulgaria and Greece. If you don't want countries interfering with our elections, don't interfere with theirs.
I digressed a little, but it was to demonstrate Obama and Democrat hypocrisy. After President Trump's surprising to the ill informed victory, HRC was livid and needed to formulate an excuse to explain her defeat. Her partner in crime was Obama, who sought to discredit and diminish the new president as he rightly feared his perverted legacy would be in jeopardy. So the Russia hoax was concocted. Many countries try to hack each other and Russia is no exception, Wikileaks periodically published emails supposably hacked by Russian operatives from the DNC and its officials like Jon Podesta. These emails showed both the unethical and criminal side of HRC. The Democrats immediately blamed the messenger. It was their only hope. When that didn't work very well, they decided to say the President Trump or people in his campaign or family colluded with the Russians. Ultimately the FBI under James Comey said that there was no evidence that Russia or anyone else altered the voting results. That tells the Democrats that if you had behaved yourselves, there would have been nothing for Wikileaks to report. What even more condemning to the DNC is that the FBI warned them about Russian hacking and they refused to turn their computers over to the FBI. What else did they have on those hard drives that they wished to keep secret? Apparently the FBI didn't warn the Republicans as it wasn't necessary.
Though the Obama regime knew about hacking well before the conventions, nothing was really done about it as Obama expected HRC to win and protect his legacy. Apparently Obama had been spying on Republicans. In 1993, Bill Clinton requested 1000 FBI files on prominent Republicans, allegedly at a time when he was stocking his cabinet. The "Filegate" scandal resulted. The pages of the log of who and when these files were signed out disappeared. Some years later Bill Clinton was impeached (but not for treason of giving Red China missile guidance technology) and nearly every prominent Republican in the HOR later resigned alleging some sort of misconduct. Spying on the opposition has always been a part of Democrat presidencies. Links to Russia, still something of an enemy to America, seemed a likely choice to tie to Republicans and especially the Trump team who were obviously going to get positions in the Trump administration is he won.
Then the unthinkable happened to the Democrats, Trump won, so Obama's contingency plan was begun. First they attack General Flynn's appointed to NSA. Flynn's stellar military career mostly involved military intelligence and he retired as part of Obama's Hitler like purge of some of our best generals and admirals (Obama's War With the Military, 4/22/16). During his post military career he had meetings with Russians and Turks, yet The Obama regime did not remove his top secret clearance. That meant one of three things, either the regime was very sloppy, it thought that these meetings were unimportant, or they wished to preserve Flynn only to be able to attack him later, if necessary. I'll let you choose, though my choice is number three. Let me explain. Despite claims of ignorance or sloppiness, that was just used as an excuse by Obama to avoid blame for the many illegal schemes his regime carried out. Being an agent for the Turkish government certainly would have mattered. so we are left with number three.
Flynn's unmasking may or not have been a serious crime, but leaking his name certainly is and the best possibilities for leakers are notorious liar Susan Rice and notorious scum bag Ben Rhodes. Other leaks that have since followed are also crimes and need to be vigorously prosecuted. Sadly AG Sessions recused himself unnecessarily. As a senator, he met many foreign dignitaries and ambassadors. That was part of his job. If being at an affair with the Russian ambassador is reason enough for recusal, than most of the senators on the committee investigating this should also recuse themselves. Both Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch aggressively shielded Obama from many situations that called for a special consul, Sessions should have done the same over these ridiculous charges. Now we have an obvious biased special consul extending his so called investigation well beyond what is called for. Is he that much in need of a job, that he needs to prolong this farce. In addition he has hired a slew of HRC supporters. I wonder what he will come up with. Did a Russian buy a condo from one of Trumps companies, or did he dine at the Russian Tea room? Ivanka has a sort of a Russian sounding name and Melania is from Eastern Europe, once part of the Iron Curtain.
I suggest that the Democrats are going to wind up with nothing and will be made fools of themselves. They have no real leadership or ideas. Their only hope is that Mueller can drag this out until the 2018 election. Meanwhile they are hurting the American people by helping the republicans to create a log jam.
Now an update. The shamefully biased MSM has recently begun salivating at a story that Donald Trump Jr, Jared Kushner, and met with a Russian attorney before the Republican convention who had contacted them by email and claimed to have the goods on HRC. As it turned out, that was not the case and it seemed like she was only trying to get adoptions for Russian children reestablished. The meeting lasted less than 20 minutes and all have testified to that before congress. Can you imagine John Podesta Now it seems that this attorney with no apparent ties to the Russian government did have ties to Fusion GPS a company that worked against President Trump by creating a false file that a former British MI6 agent tried to sell to the CIA. In addition they were hired by the Clinton campaign to promote dirty tricks against Donald Trump. This meeting was not about getting the goods on Hillary or Russian orphans, it was about entrapment plain and simple and this and the whole Russian Scheme will burn HRC and the Democrats. There is already rumor the Mueller is actually investigating Russian interference and that he is including HRC in his investigation. We shall see.
Another update: Seth Rich, a DNC worker, was murdered last summer. As it turns out after unlocking his personal computer, contacts with Wikileaks have been found. He may have been the leaker so was his murder a robbery gone bad or something else? Also a Pakistani IT worker for DSW and other Democrat congressmen was arrested trying to leave the country for Pakistan via Qatar. His wife had left a few months earlier, was found to have $12000 hidden in her suit case and after $285000 had been wired to a bank in Pakistan. He and four family members collected $4million in tax payer money as IT workers, an outrageous amount similar to what a chief of staff would make. When evidence was presented of transfer of data from congressional computers to his personal unsecured computer, he was fired by all, but DSW and though he no longer had access to any congressional computers, she nonetheless kept him on the payroll. Why? Blackmail? She didn't fire him until he was arrested for bank fraud, trying to leave the country. A laptop computer was seized by the DC Police and DSW threatened "consequences" if it were not returned immediately. Could this be obstruction of justice? The attorney now representing Imran Awan is DWS's attorney. Obviously a full investigation is in order. The MSM is ignoring this important story. Real news is no longer reported.
One more update: the unmasking scandal continues to grow. It turns out that the Obama regime unmasked thousands of American citizens especially after the election. Key unmaskers were Susan Rice and James Clapper, but we have also learned that UN secretary Samantha Powers and all purpose turd, Ben Rhodes also requested unmasking, Rhodes hundreds of times. Neither has intelligence experience, but both are political hacks. My sources tell me that Rhodes is the leaker and if so, the filthy scumbag needs to be tried, convicted, and thrown in our worst federal prison.
Stay tuned more to come.
ple
The Democrats needed some sort of excuse as to why their terrible candidate lost the presidential election and so it was decided that the Russians who at best has an unfriendly relationship with America would serve as the whipping boy. Obama had always been an expert on dirty tricks to get elected and since he hates President Trump, he offered his team's expertise. He had double crossed his political mentor, communist Alice Palmer, to obtain an Illinois state senate seat. Then, with the aid of David Axelrod, managed to get both his primary and general election rival candidates to drop their candidacy by having someone commit crimes to unseal and report sealed divorce and child custody records.
Attempting to gain information about candidates and elections goes on all the time. I'm certain that the CIA participates in this soft of spying routinely, but Obama and the Clinton took this to another level. During the 1999 elections in Israel, Clinton sent three of his top campaign advisors to Israel to help Labor Party candidate Ehud Barak attempt to defeat Benjamin Netanyahu. They included James Carville, Robert Schrum, and Stanley Greenberg. They failed. In 2015, Obama's head of field operation during the 2012 election, was hired by OneVoice, a left wing Israeli group, to defeat Netanyahu. They were also given $350,000 American taxpayer dollars earmarked for the peace process, but spent instead to try to oust Netanyahu. I have recently told you about the Obama regime's efforts to fund antigovernment activities in Macedonia. Obama, via USAID, sent most of the funding through the US embassy in Skopje and $9.6 million pledged by USAID to the George Soros sponsored Foundation Open Society Macedonia. (Look for an update soon.) Soros wants to change the right leaning government with low taxes, friendship to Israel, right to life policies, and a fence to keep out middle eastern refugees into a Muslim-socialist country getting backing not only from the US, but all of its neighbors including Muslim Albania and Kosovo and Bulgaria and Greece. If you don't want countries interfering with our elections, don't interfere with theirs.
I digressed a little, but it was to demonstrate Obama and Democrat hypocrisy. After President Trump's surprising to the ill informed victory, HRC was livid and needed to formulate an excuse to explain her defeat. Her partner in crime was Obama, who sought to discredit and diminish the new president as he rightly feared his perverted legacy would be in jeopardy. So the Russia hoax was concocted. Many countries try to hack each other and Russia is no exception, Wikileaks periodically published emails supposably hacked by Russian operatives from the DNC and its officials like Jon Podesta. These emails showed both the unethical and criminal side of HRC. The Democrats immediately blamed the messenger. It was their only hope. When that didn't work very well, they decided to say the President Trump or people in his campaign or family colluded with the Russians. Ultimately the FBI under James Comey said that there was no evidence that Russia or anyone else altered the voting results. That tells the Democrats that if you had behaved yourselves, there would have been nothing for Wikileaks to report. What even more condemning to the DNC is that the FBI warned them about Russian hacking and they refused to turn their computers over to the FBI. What else did they have on those hard drives that they wished to keep secret? Apparently the FBI didn't warn the Republicans as it wasn't necessary.
Though the Obama regime knew about hacking well before the conventions, nothing was really done about it as Obama expected HRC to win and protect his legacy. Apparently Obama had been spying on Republicans. In 1993, Bill Clinton requested 1000 FBI files on prominent Republicans, allegedly at a time when he was stocking his cabinet. The "Filegate" scandal resulted. The pages of the log of who and when these files were signed out disappeared. Some years later Bill Clinton was impeached (but not for treason of giving Red China missile guidance technology) and nearly every prominent Republican in the HOR later resigned alleging some sort of misconduct. Spying on the opposition has always been a part of Democrat presidencies. Links to Russia, still something of an enemy to America, seemed a likely choice to tie to Republicans and especially the Trump team who were obviously going to get positions in the Trump administration is he won.
Then the unthinkable happened to the Democrats, Trump won, so Obama's contingency plan was begun. First they attack General Flynn's appointed to NSA. Flynn's stellar military career mostly involved military intelligence and he retired as part of Obama's Hitler like purge of some of our best generals and admirals (Obama's War With the Military, 4/22/16). During his post military career he had meetings with Russians and Turks, yet The Obama regime did not remove his top secret clearance. That meant one of three things, either the regime was very sloppy, it thought that these meetings were unimportant, or they wished to preserve Flynn only to be able to attack him later, if necessary. I'll let you choose, though my choice is number three. Let me explain. Despite claims of ignorance or sloppiness, that was just used as an excuse by Obama to avoid blame for the many illegal schemes his regime carried out. Being an agent for the Turkish government certainly would have mattered. so we are left with number three.
Flynn's unmasking may or not have been a serious crime, but leaking his name certainly is and the best possibilities for leakers are notorious liar Susan Rice and notorious scum bag Ben Rhodes. Other leaks that have since followed are also crimes and need to be vigorously prosecuted. Sadly AG Sessions recused himself unnecessarily. As a senator, he met many foreign dignitaries and ambassadors. That was part of his job. If being at an affair with the Russian ambassador is reason enough for recusal, than most of the senators on the committee investigating this should also recuse themselves. Both Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch aggressively shielded Obama from many situations that called for a special consul, Sessions should have done the same over these ridiculous charges. Now we have an obvious biased special consul extending his so called investigation well beyond what is called for. Is he that much in need of a job, that he needs to prolong this farce. In addition he has hired a slew of HRC supporters. I wonder what he will come up with. Did a Russian buy a condo from one of Trumps companies, or did he dine at the Russian Tea room? Ivanka has a sort of a Russian sounding name and Melania is from Eastern Europe, once part of the Iron Curtain.
I suggest that the Democrats are going to wind up with nothing and will be made fools of themselves. They have no real leadership or ideas. Their only hope is that Mueller can drag this out until the 2018 election. Meanwhile they are hurting the American people by helping the republicans to create a log jam.
Now an update. The shamefully biased MSM has recently begun salivating at a story that Donald Trump Jr, Jared Kushner, and met with a Russian attorney before the Republican convention who had contacted them by email and claimed to have the goods on HRC. As it turned out, that was not the case and it seemed like she was only trying to get adoptions for Russian children reestablished. The meeting lasted less than 20 minutes and all have testified to that before congress. Can you imagine John Podesta Now it seems that this attorney with no apparent ties to the Russian government did have ties to Fusion GPS a company that worked against President Trump by creating a false file that a former British MI6 agent tried to sell to the CIA. In addition they were hired by the Clinton campaign to promote dirty tricks against Donald Trump. This meeting was not about getting the goods on Hillary or Russian orphans, it was about entrapment plain and simple and this and the whole Russian Scheme will burn HRC and the Democrats. There is already rumor the Mueller is actually investigating Russian interference and that he is including HRC in his investigation. We shall see.
Another update: Seth Rich, a DNC worker, was murdered last summer. As it turns out after unlocking his personal computer, contacts with Wikileaks have been found. He may have been the leaker so was his murder a robbery gone bad or something else? Also a Pakistani IT worker for DSW and other Democrat congressmen was arrested trying to leave the country for Pakistan via Qatar. His wife had left a few months earlier, was found to have $12000 hidden in her suit case and after $285000 had been wired to a bank in Pakistan. He and four family members collected $4million in tax payer money as IT workers, an outrageous amount similar to what a chief of staff would make. When evidence was presented of transfer of data from congressional computers to his personal unsecured computer, he was fired by all, but DSW and though he no longer had access to any congressional computers, she nonetheless kept him on the payroll. Why? Blackmail? She didn't fire him until he was arrested for bank fraud, trying to leave the country. A laptop computer was seized by the DC Police and DSW threatened "consequences" if it were not returned immediately. Could this be obstruction of justice? The attorney now representing Imran Awan is DWS's attorney. Obviously a full investigation is in order. The MSM is ignoring this important story. Real news is no longer reported.
One more update: the unmasking scandal continues to grow. It turns out that the Obama regime unmasked thousands of American citizens especially after the election. Key unmaskers were Susan Rice and James Clapper, but we have also learned that UN secretary Samantha Powers and all purpose turd, Ben Rhodes also requested unmasking, Rhodes hundreds of times. Neither has intelligence experience, but both are political hacks. My sources tell me that Rhodes is the leaker and if so, the filthy scumbag needs to be tried, convicted, and thrown in our worst federal prison.
Stay tuned more to come.
ple
Monday, July 17, 2017
Why the Left (and some on the right) Want Trump Gone
The Presidential election of 2016 had to be one of the most unusual in American history. Prior to President Trump"s election, no other American president had been a businessman with absolutely no political experience. Previous presidents had either served somewhere in state or federal government or in the military. The last president, Obama, was a shadowy character. Few important details of his life were known and the MSM made certain that those details were keep well hidden. Instead, the ridiculous birther issue served as a diversion from the more important issues of his background. Obama promised to fundamentally change America, but never mentioned what he wanted to change America into. If he had, I doubt whether he would have gotten a single electoral vote as his idea of change was passed on to him by Saul Alinsky, Frank Davis, Edward Said, Richard Cloward, and even Bill Ayers and Alice Palmer. Instead Obama and the MSM obscured his relationships with these mentors but promoted the misinformation in his two autobiographies, purposely written to hide what and how he wanted to change America.
President Trump and many Americans of all political persuasions came to realize the destructive path that Obama had led America down in his eight years in office even though they didn't know why. On the surface Obama seemed amiable only wanting the best, but in reality he was a monster wanting to destroy the middle class and capitalism. His backing came from wealthy and powerful far left elitists who shielded and backed him. In the process he nearly destroyed the Democrat Party. Sadly, most haven't realized that their support for him is the reason for the near demise of their party. More than 1000 elected offices became Republican across the country. With few exceptions a map of America is nearly all red except for a few specks of blue in the northeast, along the west coast, and in decaying cities nationwide. Most Democrats from so called safe districts or states don't realize that a more centrist Democrat candidate may dislodge them from office. Ironically that is just the kind of candidate they are trying to recruit to win Republican Districts.
Unfortunately, it seems like the main job of most politicians is to get reelected. What's best for America and their constituency comes second. With districts gerrymandered to support one type of candidate, many congressional districts are relatively safe for a political party. So many are more afraid of a primary challenge then that in the actual election. Democrats have been led to believe that the far far left will supply them with the money to pay for a successful campaign. Ossoff, despite outspending Karen Hansen seven to one in the most expensive congressional race ever, lost. The fact that most of the money came from donors outside of Georgia was certainly part of the reason and symptomatic of what the Democrat party has become. Similarly, HRC outspent President Trump by hundreds of millions of dollars. Even with loads of money, a bad candidate with little or no message can't win very often.
As a business man President Trump is interested in efficiency. On time and under budget is mantra of any builder. His cabinet is also made up of highly successful businessmen and women and military men who know how to get things done in an efficient manner. Sadly over the years our government has become very bloated and inefficient. Government bureaucrats fearful of job loss may also be counterproductive to efficiency. Some inefficiency has been built into government by the Constitution. The distribution of power and the rise of political parties tends to slow down the legislative process. This can be a good thing as careful deliberation is necessary for a new legislation that can change America. But in today's political environment, it makes it difficult to get anything done, as many politicians would rather play to those who finance their campaigns then the American people. During the campaign, President Trump vowed to drain the swamp and now those affected by this type of action are very fearful that he might just be successful and that they loose their position and power.
No group has more to loose than the Black Congressional Caucus. If Trump is successful in reversing the cycle of poverty in their districts, likeminded black Republicans might just capture those districts. Most black congressional member represent some of the poorest congressional districts, some like Maxine Waters, have been in Congress for 24 years and although the district she represents remains poor, she has become one of the wealthiest in the district, that is if she actually lived in her poor crime ridden district. I've done my best to try and find net worth of various members of congress, but reporting data is vague and does not include value of residences, though it does include mortgage debt as a liability. Waters, in fact, lives in a mansion worth $4.5 million outside of the 35th California Congressional district, she is supposed to represent. Despite the ease of underreporting net worth, most members of the Black Congressional Caucus are millionaires and are among the wealthiest in the congressional district they are supposed to represent. Yet they keep getting reelected despite their poor performance for their constituency. The reason is simple, victimization . They convince their constituency that being poor is not their fault and that they will make certain they get welfare benefits, medicaid or Obamacare, food stamps. Obamaphones, and other cash payments or subsidies except for one thing, jobs. Education is of course the key to getting out of poverty and the public schools in many of these districts are among the worst. You would think that the Congressional Black Caucus would be screaming for vouchers and school choice. Instead, they back the horrible schools in their district as they get campaign money from the teachers' unions to tow the party line. If they don't, they will have a primary opponent that is backed by the unions. So they push affirmative action and free college. Sounds good, but it does not make up for a poor k-12 education.
The Russia "matter" is in reality a hoax to keep Trump's success from being heralded to all America. Some of the Russia hoax is an obvious set up. It is no coincidence that every time Trump succeeds, the MSM reacts to some supposed scandal. Leftist hypocrisy is rampant with the MSM and elitist DC leftists. They hope that they can draw this out until November of 2018. I heard no cries of impeach Obama, a man who needed to be impeached and hung for treason. No special councils were assigned for any of the massive scandals that rocked his administration. Bill Clinton was impeached, but for the wrong reason. He actually committed treason by allowing a campaign bundler, Bernie Schwartz CEO of Lorel, sell missile guidance technology to the Red Chinese Army for $20 million in illegal campaign contributions. Some of that technology is in the hands of Iran and North Korea. HRC is also a traitor for allowing Russian oligarchs to purchase US Uranium for a $145 million bribe to the Clinton Foundation laundered through a paper Canadian charity and pay Bill a $500 thousand speaking fee. As far as dirt goes, the Clintons, through "filegate," had dirt on every prominent Republican and certainly Podesta with his Media Matters and Center for American Progress cohorts did too. That's part of the rough and tumble of politics.
The Republican need to realize that their majorities may be very fragile, and unless they act now, the resistance and Democrats may win out in the end. Even if it means having a rival in the next primary, doing whats best for America is what they have been sent to Washington to accomplish.
Unfortunately, it seems like the main job of most politicians is to get reelected. What's best for America and their constituency comes second. With districts gerrymandered to support one type of candidate, many congressional districts are relatively safe for a political party. So many are more afraid of a primary challenge then that in the actual election. Democrats have been led to believe that the far far left will supply them with the money to pay for a successful campaign. Ossoff, despite outspending Karen Hansen seven to one in the most expensive congressional race ever, lost. The fact that most of the money came from donors outside of Georgia was certainly part of the reason and symptomatic of what the Democrat party has become. Similarly, HRC outspent President Trump by hundreds of millions of dollars. Even with loads of money, a bad candidate with little or no message can't win very often.
As a business man President Trump is interested in efficiency. On time and under budget is mantra of any builder. His cabinet is also made up of highly successful businessmen and women and military men who know how to get things done in an efficient manner. Sadly over the years our government has become very bloated and inefficient. Government bureaucrats fearful of job loss may also be counterproductive to efficiency. Some inefficiency has been built into government by the Constitution. The distribution of power and the rise of political parties tends to slow down the legislative process. This can be a good thing as careful deliberation is necessary for a new legislation that can change America. But in today's political environment, it makes it difficult to get anything done, as many politicians would rather play to those who finance their campaigns then the American people. During the campaign, President Trump vowed to drain the swamp and now those affected by this type of action are very fearful that he might just be successful and that they loose their position and power.
No group has more to loose than the Black Congressional Caucus. If Trump is successful in reversing the cycle of poverty in their districts, likeminded black Republicans might just capture those districts. Most black congressional member represent some of the poorest congressional districts, some like Maxine Waters, have been in Congress for 24 years and although the district she represents remains poor, she has become one of the wealthiest in the district, that is if she actually lived in her poor crime ridden district. I've done my best to try and find net worth of various members of congress, but reporting data is vague and does not include value of residences, though it does include mortgage debt as a liability. Waters, in fact, lives in a mansion worth $4.5 million outside of the 35th California Congressional district, she is supposed to represent. Despite the ease of underreporting net worth, most members of the Black Congressional Caucus are millionaires and are among the wealthiest in the congressional district they are supposed to represent. Yet they keep getting reelected despite their poor performance for their constituency. The reason is simple, victimization . They convince their constituency that being poor is not their fault and that they will make certain they get welfare benefits, medicaid or Obamacare, food stamps. Obamaphones, and other cash payments or subsidies except for one thing, jobs. Education is of course the key to getting out of poverty and the public schools in many of these districts are among the worst. You would think that the Congressional Black Caucus would be screaming for vouchers and school choice. Instead, they back the horrible schools in their district as they get campaign money from the teachers' unions to tow the party line. If they don't, they will have a primary opponent that is backed by the unions. So they push affirmative action and free college. Sounds good, but it does not make up for a poor k-12 education.
The Russia "matter" is in reality a hoax to keep Trump's success from being heralded to all America. Some of the Russia hoax is an obvious set up. It is no coincidence that every time Trump succeeds, the MSM reacts to some supposed scandal. Leftist hypocrisy is rampant with the MSM and elitist DC leftists. They hope that they can draw this out until November of 2018. I heard no cries of impeach Obama, a man who needed to be impeached and hung for treason. No special councils were assigned for any of the massive scandals that rocked his administration. Bill Clinton was impeached, but for the wrong reason. He actually committed treason by allowing a campaign bundler, Bernie Schwartz CEO of Lorel, sell missile guidance technology to the Red Chinese Army for $20 million in illegal campaign contributions. Some of that technology is in the hands of Iran and North Korea. HRC is also a traitor for allowing Russian oligarchs to purchase US Uranium for a $145 million bribe to the Clinton Foundation laundered through a paper Canadian charity and pay Bill a $500 thousand speaking fee. As far as dirt goes, the Clintons, through "filegate," had dirt on every prominent Republican and certainly Podesta with his Media Matters and Center for American Progress cohorts did too. That's part of the rough and tumble of politics.
The Republican need to realize that their majorities may be very fragile, and unless they act now, the resistance and Democrats may win out in the end. Even if it means having a rival in the next primary, doing whats best for America is what they have been sent to Washington to accomplish.
Thursday, June 22, 2017
Obama, America's Biggest Drug Dealer and a Few comments on Russia.
Drug related deaths are up all across the United States and in some areas at record proportions and are the leading cause of death in white males between the ages of 25 and 34. Opioids are the main offenders causing about 50% of overdose deaths with cocaine, crack, and meth related drugs contributing about 25%. The rest are other drugs including methadone and marijuana products. Although heroin is the main offender, fentanyl, a synthetic and far more powerful drug, is rapidly moving up. Some fentanyl is manufactured in Mexico, but with better border control China has become the main source. Both product, chemicals to make product, and pill presses are turning up all over America with China as the point of origin.
I wonder what Obama was thinking by commuting the sentences of 1625 drug dealers since 2014. He says that he believes that drug dealing is a non violent crime and that black men are given sentences that are too long and don't fit the crime. As usual he is wrong and instead of solving the problem he becomes part of it. Many of the drug dealers he released were both repeat offenders and guilty of gun crimes as well. Obama thinks its okay for drug dealers to have guns, but not the rest of us law abiding citizens.
In Obama's adopted home town of Chicago there is a huge gun related murder rate and much of the crime and murders are drug related. Turf battle are common among gangs who vow for a street corner that might be lucrative. Black on black crime is out of control and no one seems to care. Crimes related to drugs are also on the rise as addicts commit crimes in order to obtain cash for drugs or hold up drug dealers for cash and drugs. So much as a non violent crime.The drug related death rate, both homicides and overdoses will continue to rise with 1625 violent drug dealers back on the streets. Obama seemed more interested in busting criminals out of jail rather than putting them in. Maybe he expects them to be granted their right to vote again. Scumbag and Clinton ally Terry McAuliff, governor of Virginia, tried to unsuccessfully restore voting rights to 200,00 Virginia felons who had served their sentences knowing they would all vote Democrat. Maybe Obama feels the same way about drug dealers. Every vote counts.
The recent Senate hearing have cleared President Trump of any collusion with the Russians, as if there was a smidgen of evidence that it existed. Collusion implies that President Trump or someone on his team asked the Russians to help candidate Trump win the election. Hillary blames Macedonia (see recent blog on Macedonia). What is more likely is that Macedonia tried to get even with HRC and Obama, who colluded with George Soros and the country's left to affect elections to replace the conservative elected government. If Podesta, Debbie, Donna Brazile, and HRC had not broken the law or behaved unethically, there would have been nothing to report. To this, HRC and the Democrats continue to blame the messenger rather than the message. I have discussed Macedonia in a recent blog and suggest that Congress look into Obama's attempt to affect elections in other countries. Israel also comes to mind. The Democrats have nothing to run on and are trying to prolong this nonsense as the main issue for the 2018 mid term elections.
Democrats have suggested the AG Jeff Sessions resign. Sessions has behaved admirably and probably done more to eliminate any appearance of conflict of interest. His so called meeting with Russian Ambassador Sergi Kislov were incidental and in a crowded room where they may have done little more than shook hands. The questioning of Sessions by the Democrats was shameful and they all have very short memories as Obama's first AG Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress and failed to turn over documents subpoenaed by Congress even when a federal judge ruled they had to do so. Now we have learned that AG Loretta Lynch, Obama's second AG, told then FBI chief Comey to mollify his remarks and call the Clinton criminal investigation a "matter." That combined with an attempted clandestine meeting on an airport tarmac in Arizona certainly bears looking into especially since HRC's actions with her server, top secret information, and pay for play with the Clinton Foundation have never been punished and are screaming of privileged treatment.
In my opinion President Trump should never have allowed a special counsel. I think he was set up by Comey and the Democrats. Only if HRC, Bill, Chelsea, Comey, and Loretta Lynch are also investigated and charged will this have any validity.
I wonder what Obama was thinking by commuting the sentences of 1625 drug dealers since 2014. He says that he believes that drug dealing is a non violent crime and that black men are given sentences that are too long and don't fit the crime. As usual he is wrong and instead of solving the problem he becomes part of it. Many of the drug dealers he released were both repeat offenders and guilty of gun crimes as well. Obama thinks its okay for drug dealers to have guns, but not the rest of us law abiding citizens.
In Obama's adopted home town of Chicago there is a huge gun related murder rate and much of the crime and murders are drug related. Turf battle are common among gangs who vow for a street corner that might be lucrative. Black on black crime is out of control and no one seems to care. Crimes related to drugs are also on the rise as addicts commit crimes in order to obtain cash for drugs or hold up drug dealers for cash and drugs. So much as a non violent crime.The drug related death rate, both homicides and overdoses will continue to rise with 1625 violent drug dealers back on the streets. Obama seemed more interested in busting criminals out of jail rather than putting them in. Maybe he expects them to be granted their right to vote again. Scumbag and Clinton ally Terry McAuliff, governor of Virginia, tried to unsuccessfully restore voting rights to 200,00 Virginia felons who had served their sentences knowing they would all vote Democrat. Maybe Obama feels the same way about drug dealers. Every vote counts.
The recent Senate hearing have cleared President Trump of any collusion with the Russians, as if there was a smidgen of evidence that it existed. Collusion implies that President Trump or someone on his team asked the Russians to help candidate Trump win the election. Hillary blames Macedonia (see recent blog on Macedonia). What is more likely is that Macedonia tried to get even with HRC and Obama, who colluded with George Soros and the country's left to affect elections to replace the conservative elected government. If Podesta, Debbie, Donna Brazile, and HRC had not broken the law or behaved unethically, there would have been nothing to report. To this, HRC and the Democrats continue to blame the messenger rather than the message. I have discussed Macedonia in a recent blog and suggest that Congress look into Obama's attempt to affect elections in other countries. Israel also comes to mind. The Democrats have nothing to run on and are trying to prolong this nonsense as the main issue for the 2018 mid term elections.
Democrats have suggested the AG Jeff Sessions resign. Sessions has behaved admirably and probably done more to eliminate any appearance of conflict of interest. His so called meeting with Russian Ambassador Sergi Kislov were incidental and in a crowded room where they may have done little more than shook hands. The questioning of Sessions by the Democrats was shameful and they all have very short memories as Obama's first AG Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress and failed to turn over documents subpoenaed by Congress even when a federal judge ruled they had to do so. Now we have learned that AG Loretta Lynch, Obama's second AG, told then FBI chief Comey to mollify his remarks and call the Clinton criminal investigation a "matter." That combined with an attempted clandestine meeting on an airport tarmac in Arizona certainly bears looking into especially since HRC's actions with her server, top secret information, and pay for play with the Clinton Foundation have never been punished and are screaming of privileged treatment.
In my opinion President Trump should never have allowed a special counsel. I think he was set up by Comey and the Democrats. Only if HRC, Bill, Chelsea, Comey, and Loretta Lynch are also investigated and charged will this have any validity.
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
Diversity and Division: the Left and Vctimization
Most people, both Democrats and Republicans, thought that Barack Obama would be a voice of unity for the country, as the first African-American president in our history. Instead, he created the most divisive period in the last fifty years. The first thing to consider is that Obama has little in common with the average African-American besides the color of his skin and that he was abandoned by his parents and raised by his grandparents. He had almost no contact with any African-Americans during his formative years. He was raised during his early life in Djakarta, Indonesia and when back in Hawaii, educated at an exclusive private School in Honolulu. Even at Occidental College and Columbia University his friends and roommates were Pakistani. He did have one very important African-American in his life, Frank Davis, who mentored him as a teenager. Davis, of course, was an admitted member of the Communist Party of America. Davis spent much of his active life as a communist in Chicago and is the reason why Obama wound up there after graduating from Columbia and why he was quickly accepted by and became a member of the far left elite on the Southside. Most importantly, he has been the one that shaped Obama's hatred toward America and why he cryptically sought "fundamental change". The former first lady is no better. Ironically, her poorly written senior thesis at Princeton criticizes African-American Princeton graduates who then go on to a career in law, medicine, or business and leave the African-American community. Hmm Michelle, I guess you have become that of what you were critical. Realistically, why would anyone want to remain in a poverty stricken inner city with its inadequate housing and education, and high crime rate?
No group had more hope or a need for an improvement in their lives than African-Americans. Instead Obama selected far left ideology rather than improving the lives of African-Americans. Unemployment soared during his regime with young African-Americans males leading the group of the unemployed. They became mere pawns in his agenda to destroy capitalism using welfare as one of the pillars of his plan. Most African-Americans would have rather had jobs than EBT cards. He calculated that most African Americans would continue to support him no matter what he did, even if he hurt them economically. By blaming his predecessor and with the help of a complicit mainstream media, he managed to divert ill will from his regime to the previous administration, trying to elicit sympathy for what he tried to convince his supporters was a terrible situation. Little did they know that his ultimate goal was the destruction of capitalism, the middle class, and the American economy. They were mere fodder for his far left vision.
Publicly we ought to celebrate that which unifies us, namely we are all Americans with the same rights and privileges. Privately we are free to practice the things that do make us different like religion or family national origin and customs and even sexuality, but unity represents a huge threat to the left. The Democrats and progressives would rather separate Americans into different groups under the guise of diversity. The emphasis on diversity is key, as it becomes the sedge way to victimization, Everyone is a victim, African Americans, women, gays, lesbians, transgenders, and Muslims except for one group, white men. White men represent the privileged class and are the oppressors and the root cause of evil. No where is this perverted philosophy more prevalent than on our college campuses. Safe spaces, abolishment of free speech, and so called micro aggressions are the most obvious examples. That some white men have succeeded because of hard work and determination doesn't count, its white privilege that's responsible. Blame an outside source for your personal short comings. Communist Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, and N.Korea blame America, the Palestinians blame Israel, and two bit African dictators blame their neighbors or rival tribes. This diverts attention from their inadequacies and failures and transfers it to a perceived enemy. Obama used this same strategy to explain why America failed under his regime, when in fact it was his efforts to purposely make America fail.
The worst place to practice diversity would be our educational system, but due to the failings of school boards and teachers' unions, this is not the case. Despite controlling most our major cities for more than fifty years, not only have the Democrats and liberals not ended or at least diminished poverty, they have failed to adequately educate inner city youths. One simple and very valid explanation is that the elected leadership supports the teachers' unions and not the students. The main function of the teachers' unions, sadly, is to keep bad teachers employed. In some cities, bad teachers are not allowed to teach, but gather in offices or warehouses, where they sit all day playing on their laptops, still collecting a salary and benefits. Firing all these worthless teachers would allow funds to be redirected to their original purpose, to actually teaching students with new a better teachers. In addition, time is wasted on lessons that reinforce the philosophy of victimization. Affirmative action has become the solution for liberals to the unsatisfactory education that they have provided. It is also what stands behind the "free" college education movement. Neither affirmative action nor free college make up for a poor primary education. Instead, they represent a racial stereotype, implying that African-American students, just don't learn as well as others. College level Black Studies courses favor diversity and victimization, emphasizing slavery and racial discrimination but neglect many positive contributions of African-Americans to our early history. So its only right that the oppressor, the white man, sufferers. What is a unintended consequence is that the African-American student who doesn't need affirmative action is inappropriately stigmatized. Currently, colleges and universities have contributed to this, providing "safe spaces" for black students only and now even Harvard had a separate graduation for black students. Let me make it perfectly clear, affirmative action does not make up for providing an inadequate grade school education. It promotes victimization and diversity and that is what allows liberal politicians including African American politicians, who have sold out their constituents, to stay in power.
No group had more hope or a need for an improvement in their lives than African-Americans. Instead Obama selected far left ideology rather than improving the lives of African-Americans. Unemployment soared during his regime with young African-Americans males leading the group of the unemployed. They became mere pawns in his agenda to destroy capitalism using welfare as one of the pillars of his plan. Most African-Americans would have rather had jobs than EBT cards. He calculated that most African Americans would continue to support him no matter what he did, even if he hurt them economically. By blaming his predecessor and with the help of a complicit mainstream media, he managed to divert ill will from his regime to the previous administration, trying to elicit sympathy for what he tried to convince his supporters was a terrible situation. Little did they know that his ultimate goal was the destruction of capitalism, the middle class, and the American economy. They were mere fodder for his far left vision.
Publicly we ought to celebrate that which unifies us, namely we are all Americans with the same rights and privileges. Privately we are free to practice the things that do make us different like religion or family national origin and customs and even sexuality, but unity represents a huge threat to the left. The Democrats and progressives would rather separate Americans into different groups under the guise of diversity. The emphasis on diversity is key, as it becomes the sedge way to victimization, Everyone is a victim, African Americans, women, gays, lesbians, transgenders, and Muslims except for one group, white men. White men represent the privileged class and are the oppressors and the root cause of evil. No where is this perverted philosophy more prevalent than on our college campuses. Safe spaces, abolishment of free speech, and so called micro aggressions are the most obvious examples. That some white men have succeeded because of hard work and determination doesn't count, its white privilege that's responsible. Blame an outside source for your personal short comings. Communist Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, and N.Korea blame America, the Palestinians blame Israel, and two bit African dictators blame their neighbors or rival tribes. This diverts attention from their inadequacies and failures and transfers it to a perceived enemy. Obama used this same strategy to explain why America failed under his regime, when in fact it was his efforts to purposely make America fail.
The worst place to practice diversity would be our educational system, but due to the failings of school boards and teachers' unions, this is not the case. Despite controlling most our major cities for more than fifty years, not only have the Democrats and liberals not ended or at least diminished poverty, they have failed to adequately educate inner city youths. One simple and very valid explanation is that the elected leadership supports the teachers' unions and not the students. The main function of the teachers' unions, sadly, is to keep bad teachers employed. In some cities, bad teachers are not allowed to teach, but gather in offices or warehouses, where they sit all day playing on their laptops, still collecting a salary and benefits. Firing all these worthless teachers would allow funds to be redirected to their original purpose, to actually teaching students with new a better teachers. In addition, time is wasted on lessons that reinforce the philosophy of victimization. Affirmative action has become the solution for liberals to the unsatisfactory education that they have provided. It is also what stands behind the "free" college education movement. Neither affirmative action nor free college make up for a poor primary education. Instead, they represent a racial stereotype, implying that African-American students, just don't learn as well as others. College level Black Studies courses favor diversity and victimization, emphasizing slavery and racial discrimination but neglect many positive contributions of African-Americans to our early history. So its only right that the oppressor, the white man, sufferers. What is a unintended consequence is that the African-American student who doesn't need affirmative action is inappropriately stigmatized. Currently, colleges and universities have contributed to this, providing "safe spaces" for black students only and now even Harvard had a separate graduation for black students. Let me make it perfectly clear, affirmative action does not make up for providing an inadequate grade school education. It promotes victimization and diversity and that is what allows liberal politicians including African American politicians, who have sold out their constituents, to stay in power.
Monday, June 5, 2017
Macedonia: WTF
Last week loser presidential candidate HRC continued her blame and victim tour and added Macedonia to the list of her tormentors. I'm certain that few of you know much about Macedonia or even where it is located. Macedonia is a Balkan country located just north of Greece and bounded by Albania, Kosovo, Serbia, and Bulgaria. It is small and has a population of about 2 million. It came into existence with the breakup of Yugoslavia. Guess what. The left hates Macedonia. Not only does it have a conservative (for Europe) government, but it also pro life, pro Israel and when Syrian refugees began illegally crossing its borders, it built a fence (it was too poor to build a wall) to keep them out. It also has the lowest tax rate in Europe in the form of a flat tax.
Now for the good part. Naturally being conservative, caused Macedonia to raise the ire of Obama and his then Secretary of State HRC. What does the left do when it looses an election? Standard practice is to try to bring down the winner. With the aid of George Soros's Open Society Foundation, US taxpayers are unknowingly funding protests both violent and non violent to overthrow the elected government. Documents secured by Judicial Watch via FOIA requests this February have shown that Obama, Clinton, US Dept. of State, Ambassador Jess Baily, and the USAID are working with George Soros to fund the opposition protests. These protestors are even called Soros's Army and have violently stormed and disrupted parliament because of anger over election results (sound familiar). They have also printed and distributed copies of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. Ambassador Baily personally worked with Soros's Open Society Foundation to send millions to subversives. USAID is scheduled to send another $9.5 million through 2021.
According to Hillary we can now add hackers in Macedonia to hackers in Russia for her election failure. I think we need to investigate, to see if Hillary is correct. So lets investigate Hillary, Obama, Daily, USAID, and State Department in relation to Macedonia. I think we are more than likely to find that Hillary and Obama illegally used taxpayer dollars along with Soros's Open Society Foundation in an attempt to overthrow a duly elected conservative government. This is just another in a long string of treasonous acts by Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Now for the good part. Naturally being conservative, caused Macedonia to raise the ire of Obama and his then Secretary of State HRC. What does the left do when it looses an election? Standard practice is to try to bring down the winner. With the aid of George Soros's Open Society Foundation, US taxpayers are unknowingly funding protests both violent and non violent to overthrow the elected government. Documents secured by Judicial Watch via FOIA requests this February have shown that Obama, Clinton, US Dept. of State, Ambassador Jess Baily, and the USAID are working with George Soros to fund the opposition protests. These protestors are even called Soros's Army and have violently stormed and disrupted parliament because of anger over election results (sound familiar). They have also printed and distributed copies of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. Ambassador Baily personally worked with Soros's Open Society Foundation to send millions to subversives. USAID is scheduled to send another $9.5 million through 2021.
According to Hillary we can now add hackers in Macedonia to hackers in Russia for her election failure. I think we need to investigate, to see if Hillary is correct. So lets investigate Hillary, Obama, Daily, USAID, and State Department in relation to Macedonia. I think we are more than likely to find that Hillary and Obama illegally used taxpayer dollars along with Soros's Open Society Foundation in an attempt to overthrow a duly elected conservative government. This is just another in a long string of treasonous acts by Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Trump Saves America
On June 1, 2017 President Donald Trump saved America for the second time (the first was when he was elected). He backed out of what has to be the worst deal every made. There was not one positive aspect to the Paris Accord for the United States and in fact I would submit that the Obama Regime is guilty of treason for negotiating an accord that is designed to destroy America. The anti America left claims it will cost America jobs. Huh. Nothing will stop America from developing renewable energy technology, and when it becomes economically feasible, it will begin to replace other types of energy generation. There is absolutely no reason for American tax payers to subsidize the alternative energy industry. Tesla is a great example. Elon Musk has designed and manufactured a wonderful automobile (only a few have caught on fire), but I don't own one, yet I have subsidized every one built. He also owns a solar panel company that is failing due to a poor business model that switches the subsidy from the client who uses the system to his company. Why would anyone want to do that when they could get the subsidy themselves. As an elitist Musk, like Al Gore, HRC, Barack and Michelle Obama, flies around on his own private jet and uses convoys of gas guzzling limos, but complains about the carbon foot print of the average Americans.
According to the horrible deal, reduction in emissions by the United States would be greater than any other country, even though they are low already. Countries like India and China with the most polluted cities in the world could continue polluting well into the future. In fact they are allowed to increase their emissions. A draconian part has the United States and West paying third world countries $100 billion to adopt renewable energy. How's that going to work, giving the corrupt leaders of Zimbabwe, Swaziland, Angola, Equitorial Guinea, or Sudan hundreds of millions of dollars? Europe is destroying itself over renewable energy. German spent $800 billion on solar and now gets a whopping 0.3 percent of its energy from renewable sources. Spain spent a bundle on solar energy and lost two jobs for every one created and now has an unemployment rate approaching 20%.
For a monster like Obama, Paris was perfect. It responded to a problem that doesn't exist. It cost America a lot of money, basically throwing it away, and helped our economic competitors. It stifles our opportunity to reduce dependence at a time when massive amounts of energy sources are coming on line in America. Instead it wants hard working American to pay a lot more for energy like Europeans. Because of the failure of renewable energy in Germany, electric bills are 3 times as high and at least twice as high everywhere else. Of course, the poor will either pay nothing or get some sort of subsidy, so it amounts to the redistribution of wealth. This is why the left supports it. It has been said that "green is the new red."
You all know that I have proven time and time again that the global warming hoax was begun in the 1950 by a Nazi who hated America and capitalism. It found its way to the UN as a means to weaken America and eventually to Al Gore, who got rich off of it, and finally to Barack Obama who saw it as a means to rain economic hell on America. I suggest you read the paper by the most renown sea level scientist in the world. http://notrickszone.com/2016/01/03/new-paper-by-renowned-sea-level-expert-nils-axel-morner-calls-agw-a-new-religion-built-on-false-premises/.
According to the horrible deal, reduction in emissions by the United States would be greater than any other country, even though they are low already. Countries like India and China with the most polluted cities in the world could continue polluting well into the future. In fact they are allowed to increase their emissions. A draconian part has the United States and West paying third world countries $100 billion to adopt renewable energy. How's that going to work, giving the corrupt leaders of Zimbabwe, Swaziland, Angola, Equitorial Guinea, or Sudan hundreds of millions of dollars? Europe is destroying itself over renewable energy. German spent $800 billion on solar and now gets a whopping 0.3 percent of its energy from renewable sources. Spain spent a bundle on solar energy and lost two jobs for every one created and now has an unemployment rate approaching 20%.
For a monster like Obama, Paris was perfect. It responded to a problem that doesn't exist. It cost America a lot of money, basically throwing it away, and helped our economic competitors. It stifles our opportunity to reduce dependence at a time when massive amounts of energy sources are coming on line in America. Instead it wants hard working American to pay a lot more for energy like Europeans. Because of the failure of renewable energy in Germany, electric bills are 3 times as high and at least twice as high everywhere else. Of course, the poor will either pay nothing or get some sort of subsidy, so it amounts to the redistribution of wealth. This is why the left supports it. It has been said that "green is the new red."
You all know that I have proven time and time again that the global warming hoax was begun in the 1950 by a Nazi who hated America and capitalism. It found its way to the UN as a means to weaken America and eventually to Al Gore, who got rich off of it, and finally to Barack Obama who saw it as a means to rain economic hell on America. I suggest you read the paper by the most renown sea level scientist in the world. http://notrickszone.com/2016/01/03/new-paper-by-renowned-sea-level-expert-nils-axel-morner-calls-agw-a-new-religion-built-on-false-premises/.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













