Here are some random thoughts about the past year and a few predictions for the year to come. First. I don't know who is advising the Republicans, but who ever it is, should be fired immediately. Obama has been calling for a tax on millionaires and billionaires and the Republicans should hold him to it. Since when is a tax on someone who makes $250k a tax on a millionaire? If they would have pushed the concept that $250k is not a million dollars, they may have been more successful especially in the eyes of the public (but not the buased media). Romney should have done the same, stating that people that make between $250K and 999K are not necessarily millionaires, but many are small businessmen who are the engine for the economy. Taxing them will continue to keep the economy in the doldrums. Of course, anything that affects our economy in a negative way is exactly what Obama wants. He said as much,in the book Bill Ayers wrote for him, Dreams from My Father. In addition, he wants to destroy the lives of our senior citizens. Obamacare takes $50 billion out of Medicare each year at a time when 4 million new baby boomers are being added annually. His death panels will speed the demise of many grandmothers and grandfathers when life saving drugs and procedures are withheld when the death squad deems them too old, infirm, or just not contributing to Obama's concept of society. This is where the so called savings in Medicare will actually come. If you kill off the beneficiaries before they use resources then you can save money. This is his plan for saving Medicare. By killing off the elderly, he plans to save Social Security as well. This is his way of dealing with entitlements and why he hasn't otherwise put forth a separate plan to do so. Additionally, he wants to tax dividends and capital gains at a higher level. Seniors live off of the interest and dividends that their retirement savings provide, sometimes changing stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or CDs to gain an income advantage. These new taxes will have grandma and grandpa eating dog food and living with the homeless as their savings run out, unless they turn over their life savings and become eligible for food stamps. Oh I forgot, that won't be a problem as Obama will kill them off before it happens...if they are lucky. Look for the life span of American to recede as Obamacare's invasive nature takes over the life and death of all Americans. The headlines from the mainstream will not tell you this, instead it will tell you how the lives of leeches (maybe cockroaches is a better word), the welfare beneficiaries who contribute nothing and who have never contributed anything but more welfare beneficiaries, have increased. Maybe they should be required to become responsible citizens and contribute their fair share. Oh, I forgot, Obama ended "workfair" to garner their votes. It seems unfair to change the system for people who have worked, saved, and planned all their lives to live comfortably in their golden years. Obama should be impeached for enacting genocide for the elderly. And now if this is not bad enough another presidential fiat has been forced upon us that will affect the healthcare of all American in a very negative way, affirmative action on NIH research grants. Some bureaucratic moron did a study that determined that way too many grants were going to Caucasians and not enough to Blacks and Hispanics. So now there is a 10% set a side to insure that minorities get their fair share. This moron didn't understand that grants are given out on the basis merit and potential benefit and previous successes in related research and that a research team consist of a diverse group all of who benefit from the grant. Secondly, research applications don't ask for race, but I guess NIH will begin profiling applicants now. We can't profile terrorists boarding airplanes, but we will profile NIH grant applicants. Because these grants are obviously awarded on merit, grants of lesser importance may now get preference lowering the quality of research. This is exactly what the gangster Obama has done in the past, wasting our money on worthless green energy companies that contribute little to our economy, but much to his campaign war chest.
Speaking of impeachment, the ongoing hearings on Bengazigate (my own term), though damaging to some, will not disclose the real cover up. A day or two after it happened, I was able tell you pretty much what happened, apparently before Obama, Susan Rice, and Hillary Clinton knew, yeah right. The cover up would be pretty easy to discover. First an independent special prosecutor would need to be appointed. He could subpoena phone records, emails, text messages and personal visits of all involved. From these records the trail could be followed from those who watched the terrible tragedy unfold and where it went from there. The Obama regime would resist turning over these documents and then, taking a lesson from the Clintons, a lot of info would mysteriously disappear, especially those leading directly to Obama and his directives. Hillary Clinton is now deciding whether she will side with Obama or come clean, trying to determine what will hurt her the least in her run for the White House four years from now. She needn't worry, the media has a short memory, when it comes to progressive Democrats. Watergate was over an stupid burglary and forced Nixon, a relatively moderate and otherwise great president, to resign. With Bengazigate, four Americans including a United States ambassador were brutally murdered and dragged through the streets. The coverup was to shield the public from the facts so close to the election. Al Qaeda was not dead, the Arab and Moslem outreach was a failure, and they had been killed with weapons that they got from us. Sort of sounds like the "fast and furious" scandal that was successfully covered up.
It has been predicted that by 2017 the United States will be the largest producer of oil and natural gas, passing Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately our laws don't allow to export much of these valuable commodities. This will lead to a glut, which will lead to a price collapse and then a rapid slow down in oil production. The very thing that turned a backward desert wasteland into a wealthy country, namely oil exports will be denied us because of a left thinking president and congress. This is one of the reasons why pipelines have been denied and applications to build export facilities put on hold. Despite over twenty application to build export facilities for liquid natural gas (LNG), only one has been approved. As we speak LNG in North Dakota is being burned off for lack of transport pipelines. Green energy, no matter how good it sounds, is decades and maybe centuries away from replacing fossil fuels as an economic means for electricity. Those who push it now, are either too stupid to understand this, been brainwashed by the media, or want our economy to fail. This is not my opinion, this is the history of green energy to date.
The guy who admits to never having ever made a mistake and always blames everyone else, would have been happy to see us go over the fiscal cliff. Taxes go up on everyone and military spending down. Though other spending is to be cut as well, much of it would have remained or even increased by presidential edict, ignoring the Constitution and Congress, just as he has done numerous times in the past. The economy would have continued to suffer again to Obama's liking. Milk prices may have tripled and been the first sign in what could have turned to food riots, need for marshall law, and quickly turning America into a Marxist dictatorship. Opponents to the regime would have been arrested and private property and wealth confiscated. Gun owner would have been the first to go to concentration (reeducation) camps. The Republicans were caught in a trap and accepted a bad deal, but the only one available at the time. They must not cave to threats over the deficit increase. It makes sense that if you cut spending and balance the budget, there is no need to increase the deficit.
My last comments are on the recent attacks on the 2nd Amendment. None of his recent attacks and regulations by Obama would have prevented the recent tragedies in Colorado and Connecticut or the murder rate in Chicago. He said so. Then why propose them at all. The reason, of course, is to destroy the 2nd Amendment and terrorize legitimate gun owners on one level and to attack constitutional rights in general on another. Very few first degree murders are carried out by NRA members with registered weapons. What could help? Little has been said about punishment. The death sentence should apply to those convicted of first degree murder, attempted murder, armed robbery and rape with a gun with one year or one appeal after conviction and then sentence is carried out. If nothing else, it will prevent the criminal from ever committing another crime. Illegally possessing a gun, possessing a stolen gun, theft of a gun would warrant long mandatory prison terms. The situation with crazies is much harder to deal with as the libs forced there release on to our streets at the end of the 1970s and now they make up a sizable segment of the homeless population, few of whom, fortunately are dangerous. admittedly enhanced background checks and a national data base would help as long as it does not interfere with privacy rights. Remember Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Castro all disarmed their citizenry. As the patriot and father of the Bill of Rights George Mason once said,"To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
Finally, I'd like to wish all of you who follow my blog a happy and healthy New Year. I am hopeful that we the American people can overcome Obama and all of the terrible things for which he and his cronies wish upon us. Only 1461 days left for the tyrant. Pray the Constitution of the United States of America and its 22nd Amendment prevail.
Monday, January 21, 2013
Monday, December 24, 2012
Hitler's Last Stand: The Global Warming Hoax Part 4
Part 4
In the first three parts I have told you about the axis of evil that has begun the hoax of apocalyptic global warming, started by a Nazi, spread by a communist, and finally popularized by a greed driven individual and finally publicized by a dumb, left leaning media. In this last part, I plan to put the whole thing together and why this fits perfectly with the ultimate goal of Obama's presidency, redistribution of wealth.
Anything having to do with the destruction of the environment will naturally draw media attention. This makes apocalyptic global warming a perfect vehicle for wealth redistribution, not only on a national level, but also on an international level. The real purpose of the sinister plot is ultimately the overthrow of capitalism in the US and then the world and replace it with UN dominated world governance. By using the environment as a cover for their real agenda, they knew that they would always get public support. After all, everyone is for clean air and water. If you oppose it, then you are obviously going to be accused of not wanting clean air and water. Using the technique of the "big lie" popularized by Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, Gore gained widespread support for a concept that had no scientific basis in fact and was only supported by scientists who had something to gain, namely financial support for their research. Utilizing another popular technique for preventing analysis, Gore refused to debate this issue, saying that the evidence was so strong that it is a forgone conclusion and not worth debating. He knows full well that if debated, his side would loose because there is no scientific evidence supporting apocalyptic global warming, and none of the heavily slanted models have been remotely accurate.
So why has the UN and many governments, including our own, jumped on global warming as an important issue? The answer is simple, money of course, but also control. In the United States and many countries coal is very cheap. Its easy to mine and coal fired plants are easy and quick to build. Electricity from these plants is cheap for homes, but also for industry. A lower electric bill allow for more profits, that result in making it easier to expand a business and return a higher dividend to stock holders. Businesses have more control of their own destiny and profits make business decisions easier. Natural gas has become so abundant and cheap in the US that it is even replacing coal and gasoline and threatening to produce an American industrial renaissance. In some countries the cost of natural gas is as much as five times what it is here and this can bring industry and manufacturing back home. What stands in the way? One word, Obama. Using every lame excuse possible, the current regime has provided massive regulation and environmental restrictions, most not approved by congress, to make this boom nearly impossible. Why? Does it make sense to push unproven and very expensive so called "green energy"? Yes if you are interested in wealth redistribution and control. A system called "cap and trade" is already in effect in some European countries and would be debated in congress here, if it were not for massive and overwhelming opposition. Instead, Obama has used regulation to accomplish some of the same goals. Pipe lines are necessary to move gas from its drilling location for storage and distribution. We all know what Obama has done to prevent or delay the Keystone pipeline from being built. In North Dakota, liquid natural gas (LNG), a by product of gas drilling, is being burned off because there is no way to ship this valuable commodity. Due to regulation, drilling may have to shut down altogether as the burn off will not be permitted. This is why Obama appointed admitted communist and terrorist Van Jones as his green energy commissar. Jones has spoken on how green energy is another means of wealth redistribution. This brings us to the most radical, wealth destroying Obama policy ever, "cap and trade".
What is "cap and trade". It is a system that first makes the mistaken assumption the our current levels of CO2 are harmful and that there is a need to lower and cap the amount every business and person can use. Go over the cap and a fine or penalty will ensue. Here is where the "trade" comes in. If you use less than the amount assigned, then you become the owner of "carbon credits" that you can sell to those who are over their limit. Al Gore and Maurice Strong partnered with Goldman Sachs to purchase the Chicago Carbon Exchange (CCE) anticipating that "cap and trade" would sail through Congress and they would all become trillionaires (this has not happened and the CCE has gone bankrupt). What's wrong with this, it could mean cleaner air and water? Who gets to assign the various caps and collect the fines? Why government, creating a whole new and powerful bureaucracy prone to corruption, costing a huge amount of taxpayer dollars and controlling all businesses and even housing in the country. Individuals and business owners would loose control. The plan is to lower the cap over a particular time frame and that means the government will have an important hand in business decisions. It will also mean that the price of all goods, services, and especially food will increase dramatically as the cost of fines or credits will be passed on to consumers. It will also make American businesses even less competitive to those in China and India or any country not enacting this. Finally it is a subtle, but the most significant scheme to date for redistribution of wealth. At this time in many places, the poor get free or government subsidy for utilities. Who pays for this? The people who pay taxes. Under "cap and trade", the poor may even be given carbon credits that could could be sold for cash or drugs. No matter what, government will grow massively and this combined with Obamacare, another hoax that uses heathcare for income redistribution, will cause the economy to implode, leading to a socialist system and dictatorship with Obama and Moochelle presidents for life.
If this isn't bad enough the biggest group of gangsters wants to take this to the international level, raising $76 trillion by 2050 to eliminate all hydrocarbons as fuel. Where would the money come from? You guessed it, we taxpayers (China and India are somehow exempted). One would think that solar and wind actually work. They don't. Can you imagine what the Sierra Club would say if a solar panel farm, covering 500 square miles, large enough to supply electricity for a very small city, were built in the middle of a pristine desert? Interestingly, Obama doesn't even know how solar works. It works on light, not heat, and in fact heating of the solar panel makes them even less efficient. Country after country has learned that green energy doesn't work. Germany spent $100 billion on solar energy and now gets 0.3% of its electricity from this waste of money. This waste has caused the cost of electricity in Germany to skyrocket, all because of the failed investment. Trying to incorporate solar into its power grid has caused 25% unemployment and near collapse of the economy in Spain. Where would the UN spend all this money? Why in Africa, of course, where corruption rules the day, and nothing ever gets done. The UN wants to control every nation's power allowance. If he did not become president for life here, Obama may want to be UN secretary general, as this policy will allow the UN to dominate the West.
I hope that I have managed to convince you that global warming, excuse me, now climate change, is nothing but a huge hoax, whose goal is to destroy capitalism and the United States. Please read all four parts and pass this on.
In the first three parts I have told you about the axis of evil that has begun the hoax of apocalyptic global warming, started by a Nazi, spread by a communist, and finally popularized by a greed driven individual and finally publicized by a dumb, left leaning media. In this last part, I plan to put the whole thing together and why this fits perfectly with the ultimate goal of Obama's presidency, redistribution of wealth.
Anything having to do with the destruction of the environment will naturally draw media attention. This makes apocalyptic global warming a perfect vehicle for wealth redistribution, not only on a national level, but also on an international level. The real purpose of the sinister plot is ultimately the overthrow of capitalism in the US and then the world and replace it with UN dominated world governance. By using the environment as a cover for their real agenda, they knew that they would always get public support. After all, everyone is for clean air and water. If you oppose it, then you are obviously going to be accused of not wanting clean air and water. Using the technique of the "big lie" popularized by Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, Gore gained widespread support for a concept that had no scientific basis in fact and was only supported by scientists who had something to gain, namely financial support for their research. Utilizing another popular technique for preventing analysis, Gore refused to debate this issue, saying that the evidence was so strong that it is a forgone conclusion and not worth debating. He knows full well that if debated, his side would loose because there is no scientific evidence supporting apocalyptic global warming, and none of the heavily slanted models have been remotely accurate.
So why has the UN and many governments, including our own, jumped on global warming as an important issue? The answer is simple, money of course, but also control. In the United States and many countries coal is very cheap. Its easy to mine and coal fired plants are easy and quick to build. Electricity from these plants is cheap for homes, but also for industry. A lower electric bill allow for more profits, that result in making it easier to expand a business and return a higher dividend to stock holders. Businesses have more control of their own destiny and profits make business decisions easier. Natural gas has become so abundant and cheap in the US that it is even replacing coal and gasoline and threatening to produce an American industrial renaissance. In some countries the cost of natural gas is as much as five times what it is here and this can bring industry and manufacturing back home. What stands in the way? One word, Obama. Using every lame excuse possible, the current regime has provided massive regulation and environmental restrictions, most not approved by congress, to make this boom nearly impossible. Why? Does it make sense to push unproven and very expensive so called "green energy"? Yes if you are interested in wealth redistribution and control. A system called "cap and trade" is already in effect in some European countries and would be debated in congress here, if it were not for massive and overwhelming opposition. Instead, Obama has used regulation to accomplish some of the same goals. Pipe lines are necessary to move gas from its drilling location for storage and distribution. We all know what Obama has done to prevent or delay the Keystone pipeline from being built. In North Dakota, liquid natural gas (LNG), a by product of gas drilling, is being burned off because there is no way to ship this valuable commodity. Due to regulation, drilling may have to shut down altogether as the burn off will not be permitted. This is why Obama appointed admitted communist and terrorist Van Jones as his green energy commissar. Jones has spoken on how green energy is another means of wealth redistribution. This brings us to the most radical, wealth destroying Obama policy ever, "cap and trade".
What is "cap and trade". It is a system that first makes the mistaken assumption the our current levels of CO2 are harmful and that there is a need to lower and cap the amount every business and person can use. Go over the cap and a fine or penalty will ensue. Here is where the "trade" comes in. If you use less than the amount assigned, then you become the owner of "carbon credits" that you can sell to those who are over their limit. Al Gore and Maurice Strong partnered with Goldman Sachs to purchase the Chicago Carbon Exchange (CCE) anticipating that "cap and trade" would sail through Congress and they would all become trillionaires (this has not happened and the CCE has gone bankrupt). What's wrong with this, it could mean cleaner air and water? Who gets to assign the various caps and collect the fines? Why government, creating a whole new and powerful bureaucracy prone to corruption, costing a huge amount of taxpayer dollars and controlling all businesses and even housing in the country. Individuals and business owners would loose control. The plan is to lower the cap over a particular time frame and that means the government will have an important hand in business decisions. It will also mean that the price of all goods, services, and especially food will increase dramatically as the cost of fines or credits will be passed on to consumers. It will also make American businesses even less competitive to those in China and India or any country not enacting this. Finally it is a subtle, but the most significant scheme to date for redistribution of wealth. At this time in many places, the poor get free or government subsidy for utilities. Who pays for this? The people who pay taxes. Under "cap and trade", the poor may even be given carbon credits that could could be sold for cash or drugs. No matter what, government will grow massively and this combined with Obamacare, another hoax that uses heathcare for income redistribution, will cause the economy to implode, leading to a socialist system and dictatorship with Obama and Moochelle presidents for life.
If this isn't bad enough the biggest group of gangsters wants to take this to the international level, raising $76 trillion by 2050 to eliminate all hydrocarbons as fuel. Where would the money come from? You guessed it, we taxpayers (China and India are somehow exempted). One would think that solar and wind actually work. They don't. Can you imagine what the Sierra Club would say if a solar panel farm, covering 500 square miles, large enough to supply electricity for a very small city, were built in the middle of a pristine desert? Interestingly, Obama doesn't even know how solar works. It works on light, not heat, and in fact heating of the solar panel makes them even less efficient. Country after country has learned that green energy doesn't work. Germany spent $100 billion on solar energy and now gets 0.3% of its electricity from this waste of money. This waste has caused the cost of electricity in Germany to skyrocket, all because of the failed investment. Trying to incorporate solar into its power grid has caused 25% unemployment and near collapse of the economy in Spain. Where would the UN spend all this money? Why in Africa, of course, where corruption rules the day, and nothing ever gets done. The UN wants to control every nation's power allowance. If he did not become president for life here, Obama may want to be UN secretary general, as this policy will allow the UN to dominate the West.
I hope that I have managed to convince you that global warming, excuse me, now climate change, is nothing but a huge hoax, whose goal is to destroy capitalism and the United States. Please read all four parts and pass this on.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Hitler's Last Stand: The Global Warming Hoax Part3
Part 3
The last man in the evil triumvirate is Al Gore. Whereas the first two villains had a hidden agenda to undermine the United States, his was simply to make money. That he did, because when he left office in January of 2001, Gore's net worth was pegged at about $3 million, nothing to be scoffed at, but not the current estimated of $300 million. Not bad for a guy with no real job. Profits from a movie, a book, insider information, and other related deals have allowed him to amass this fortune in a relatively short period.
For those of you who do not know much about Gore, I would like to provide a little history. He was the son of Al Gore, Sr., who served three terms as Democrat congressman and three terms as US senator from Tennessee. He was a well known bigot, and voted against the Civil Right Act. His attempt at adding an amendment that would have barred Federal funding for schools forced to integrate in the South failed by a large margin with only Democrat southern senators voting in favor including Bill Clinton's mentor Sen. Fullbright. After passage, he flipped his position, as he saw the writing on the wall for his electability and voted for the voting rights act. Eventually he was defeated by a Republican, Bill Brock, in the 1970 election and he went on to work for Armand Hammer at Occidental Petroleum. He was also an executive at a Tennessee coal company.
Junior grew up in the penthouse of the Fairfax Hotel, one of DC's finest, spending little time in his home state until he was a teenager and was able to work on the family estate that grew tobacco, in Carthage, Tennessee. His entire life was spent as a child and then a man of privilege. He attended St. Albans, an exclusive all boys school in DC and, despite being an average student but a good athlete and captain of the football team, was admitted to Harvard. He continued his mediocre ways for the first two years at Harvard, where he drank, smoked marijuna, and shot pool placing in the lowest 1/5 of his class. The last two years he avoided math and science, subjects in which he did poorly, and switched his major from English to government. His grades improved. In1969 he graduated from Harvard and his draft deferment ended. With his father running for his forth term in the US Senate, it was decided that he should enter the army as an enlisted man. Despite his appearances in uniform with his father during the campaign, his father lost. The day after his father left office, he was sent to Viet Nam, where he worked as a reporter for a company of engineers and saw virtually no combat. Five months later he was honorably discharged.
He entered divinity school in Nashville, but lasted less than a year (who flunks God?), worked part time as a reporter and then entered law school. He did not finish law school either as he found it much easier to run for a soon to be vacated seat from his father's old congressional district. In a hotly contested race with multiple candidates, he won with only 32% of the vote. One of his committee appointments involved the environment, but in the late 70s a new ice age was the issue due to acid rain. After serving two congressional terms he ran for the Senate and won. He ran as a southern moderate, opposed to federal funding for abortions and for a moment of silence for individual school prayer among other issues. He even favored Desert Storm. In 1988 he made his first run for the presidency and thought he would gain an advantage when twelve southern states were holding primaries on the same day. His aspirations came to a sudden and surprising end when he was beaten by Jessie Jackson in eight of the primaries, eventually loosing out to Michael Dukakis.
Although he claimed to always be an environmentalist, Gore did not become active until the 1990s. His acquaintance with Maurice Strong may have had something to do with that. He began making outrageous statements about human based global warming. If true, I would have been up to my 18th floor coastal condominium in rising sea levels by now. This didn't happen in Gore's original time frame, so he simply made the same stupid claim ten years later and again it won't happen. Meanwhile he is pulling in big bucks as the global warming guru and poster boy.
I'll not go into the awards and accolades that Gore received here, but in part 4 I am going to tie the whole thing together and show you why the Global warming hoax is really an anti capitalist plot aimed at major wealth redistribution both for the United States and you as individuals.
The last man in the evil triumvirate is Al Gore. Whereas the first two villains had a hidden agenda to undermine the United States, his was simply to make money. That he did, because when he left office in January of 2001, Gore's net worth was pegged at about $3 million, nothing to be scoffed at, but not the current estimated of $300 million. Not bad for a guy with no real job. Profits from a movie, a book, insider information, and other related deals have allowed him to amass this fortune in a relatively short period.
For those of you who do not know much about Gore, I would like to provide a little history. He was the son of Al Gore, Sr., who served three terms as Democrat congressman and three terms as US senator from Tennessee. He was a well known bigot, and voted against the Civil Right Act. His attempt at adding an amendment that would have barred Federal funding for schools forced to integrate in the South failed by a large margin with only Democrat southern senators voting in favor including Bill Clinton's mentor Sen. Fullbright. After passage, he flipped his position, as he saw the writing on the wall for his electability and voted for the voting rights act. Eventually he was defeated by a Republican, Bill Brock, in the 1970 election and he went on to work for Armand Hammer at Occidental Petroleum. He was also an executive at a Tennessee coal company.
Junior grew up in the penthouse of the Fairfax Hotel, one of DC's finest, spending little time in his home state until he was a teenager and was able to work on the family estate that grew tobacco, in Carthage, Tennessee. His entire life was spent as a child and then a man of privilege. He attended St. Albans, an exclusive all boys school in DC and, despite being an average student but a good athlete and captain of the football team, was admitted to Harvard. He continued his mediocre ways for the first two years at Harvard, where he drank, smoked marijuna, and shot pool placing in the lowest 1/5 of his class. The last two years he avoided math and science, subjects in which he did poorly, and switched his major from English to government. His grades improved. In1969 he graduated from Harvard and his draft deferment ended. With his father running for his forth term in the US Senate, it was decided that he should enter the army as an enlisted man. Despite his appearances in uniform with his father during the campaign, his father lost. The day after his father left office, he was sent to Viet Nam, where he worked as a reporter for a company of engineers and saw virtually no combat. Five months later he was honorably discharged.
He entered divinity school in Nashville, but lasted less than a year (who flunks God?), worked part time as a reporter and then entered law school. He did not finish law school either as he found it much easier to run for a soon to be vacated seat from his father's old congressional district. In a hotly contested race with multiple candidates, he won with only 32% of the vote. One of his committee appointments involved the environment, but in the late 70s a new ice age was the issue due to acid rain. After serving two congressional terms he ran for the Senate and won. He ran as a southern moderate, opposed to federal funding for abortions and for a moment of silence for individual school prayer among other issues. He even favored Desert Storm. In 1988 he made his first run for the presidency and thought he would gain an advantage when twelve southern states were holding primaries on the same day. His aspirations came to a sudden and surprising end when he was beaten by Jessie Jackson in eight of the primaries, eventually loosing out to Michael Dukakis.
Although he claimed to always be an environmentalist, Gore did not become active until the 1990s. His acquaintance with Maurice Strong may have had something to do with that. He began making outrageous statements about human based global warming. If true, I would have been up to my 18th floor coastal condominium in rising sea levels by now. This didn't happen in Gore's original time frame, so he simply made the same stupid claim ten years later and again it won't happen. Meanwhile he is pulling in big bucks as the global warming guru and poster boy.
I'll not go into the awards and accolades that Gore received here, but in part 4 I am going to tie the whole thing together and show you why the Global warming hoax is really an anti capitalist plot aimed at major wealth redistribution both for the United States and you as individuals.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Hitler's Last Stand: The Global Warming Hoax Part 2
Part 2
I needed to find a link or links from Guenther Schwab to Al Gore as Al Gore I'm certain never read the book, I'm not certain he's even literate. Then I remembered an evil billionaire, that unlike George Soros, likes to remain below the radar, with connections to both the UN and Al Gore. This link is Maurice Strong, a Canadian Billionaire, America hater, criminal, admitted communist, and currently the environmental advisor to Communist China.
Most of you, maybe all of you, have probably never heard of this nefarious individual, but believe me he very real, very rich, very powerful, and very evil. His life is filled with ambiguity and contradiction. He is a self made individual, having been born in rural Manitoba in 1929 and grew up during the depression. In the early 1948 he landed a job with a Canadian brokerage firm as a trainee and quickly advanced to a position as the firm's oil expert. He left, first working for a major Canadian oil firm and then starting his own firm leading investors to oil and gas opportunities in Alberta. He also acquired a small oil and gas company and quickly grew it and his wealth. In the 1960s he became head of the Power Company of Canada. In 1976, He was appointed head of the national Canadian oil company Petro-Canada by Pierre Trudeau.
During the 1960s his career became intertwined with the UN and soon he was involved with Africa and environmental issues. It is here that Schwab's and Strong's paths undoubtably crossed. In 1972, he sponsored a paper by Rene Dubos and Barbara Ward on "sustainable growth" that fostered the concept of wealthy countries, i.e. the United States, giving billions to Africa. Knowing how corrupt both Strong and African leadership are, I'm certain he saw this as a way to obtain huge payoffs in return for steering money to a particular dictator's bank account. During this period he helped organize and chair several UN sponsored environmental conferences as an under secretary general. Still he continued to move in and out of the UN mixing the oil business in his private life with saving the environment in his public UN position. During the 80s an 90s he became a major investor in several companies that were primarily scams, selling his grossly inflated company stock at a huge profit, before they were exposed and went bankrupt. There was also the AWDI incident of 1986. Strong was a major investor in American Water Development Inc.. a company that wanted to drain and sell deep underground water in Saguche County, Colorado. It was opposed by local residents, the State of Colorado, and a number of environmental groups. Eventually AWDI lost its case and had to pay $3 million in court costs.
Despite his Canadian citizenship, Strong often boasted or making major contributions to American presidential campaigns as well as those of other prominent politicians of both parties. This is obviously illegal, but goes on more often than we would like. Obama's campaigns are an excellent example of a candidate taking illegal foreign money. Invariably, this is probably how he first made contact with Al Gore. He considered Gore a pompous dupe, whose father had made lots of money working for Occidental Petroleum after leaving the Senate and who could be used to further his quest for power and money. The two became friends and later business partners. In 1994, Al Gore traveled to Buffalo, New York to make a speech and give Molten Metal Industries, a company in which Strong was a major stock holder, a $35 million grant, much like Obama has done for all of the failing solar energy companies. This grant was allegedly to help expand a process that could separate various metals from waste very inexpensively. When news of the government grant went public, the stock soared over 500%. Unfortunately, a government study found that the process didn't work and shut down funding, but not before Strong sold his shares at a huge profit. This all happened about the time Gore became an environmental guru, predicting an apocalyptic catastrophe in 10 years unless something was done to control human based global warming. (I live in Florida and the intercostal didn't rise above my second story much less my seawall.)
In the 1990s and until 2005, he openly continued his involvement with the UN and at one point was considered next in line to be the Secretary General, but his luck changed. He was finally outed, when Paul Volker audited the corrupt "oil for food" program in Iraq and discovered an endorsed check for $988,885 made out to M. Strong from Saddam Hussein. This check was delivered to him by a South Korean business man, Tongun Park who went to prison for being an unregistered lobbyist for Iraq and bribing UN officials. Strong was forced to resign from his environmental post as well as UN special negotiator to North Korea, from whom he was also probably receiving bribes. Ironically, Strong and none of the other UN officials, who accepted the bribes, including Kofi Annan's son, who also worked for the UN despite its anti nepotism policy, were ever prosecuted. I guess political contributions to both parties and knowledge of much UN corruption paid off.
Although it seemed like he left the UN, he merely moved from New York to Costa Rica to run the UN sponsored University of Peace. This was a perfect spot for Strong. It got him out of the public eye and into a position that had previously accused of corruption and mismanagement. Strong was no different and became involved in an illegal governemnt land deal that put him at odds with the Costa Rican Government.
Eventually he moved to Beijing and became the environmental advisor to the Chinese Communists. In China, he had one failed venture. He and his pal George Soros decided to destroy the American automobile industry, before Obama destroyed it by bailing out the unions instead of the bond holders for GM. (The hourly cost of manpower from wages and benefits made it non competitive and the so called bailout did nothing for this. The other reason was GM manufactured too many unpopular automobiles and that hasn't changed as Obama forced them to come out with the Volt.) The Chinese with financial backing from Strong and Soros began building a car called the "Chery". The cost would be so cheap that it would destroy the competition for low end automobiles (recall the failed Yugo). A trial release in Europe, where cheap fuel efficient cars are a mainstay, failed as the Chery had two many defects and did not live up to its predicted fuel efficiency. It never made it to America.
I could provide many more stories about this amazing villian, but I'm ending Part 2 here and will move on to Part 3 about Al Gore, but you haven't heard the last of Maurice Strong. Part 3 will be published soon. Meanwhile read and pass along.
I needed to find a link or links from Guenther Schwab to Al Gore as Al Gore I'm certain never read the book, I'm not certain he's even literate. Then I remembered an evil billionaire, that unlike George Soros, likes to remain below the radar, with connections to both the UN and Al Gore. This link is Maurice Strong, a Canadian Billionaire, America hater, criminal, admitted communist, and currently the environmental advisor to Communist China.
Most of you, maybe all of you, have probably never heard of this nefarious individual, but believe me he very real, very rich, very powerful, and very evil. His life is filled with ambiguity and contradiction. He is a self made individual, having been born in rural Manitoba in 1929 and grew up during the depression. In the early 1948 he landed a job with a Canadian brokerage firm as a trainee and quickly advanced to a position as the firm's oil expert. He left, first working for a major Canadian oil firm and then starting his own firm leading investors to oil and gas opportunities in Alberta. He also acquired a small oil and gas company and quickly grew it and his wealth. In the 1960s he became head of the Power Company of Canada. In 1976, He was appointed head of the national Canadian oil company Petro-Canada by Pierre Trudeau.
During the 1960s his career became intertwined with the UN and soon he was involved with Africa and environmental issues. It is here that Schwab's and Strong's paths undoubtably crossed. In 1972, he sponsored a paper by Rene Dubos and Barbara Ward on "sustainable growth" that fostered the concept of wealthy countries, i.e. the United States, giving billions to Africa. Knowing how corrupt both Strong and African leadership are, I'm certain he saw this as a way to obtain huge payoffs in return for steering money to a particular dictator's bank account. During this period he helped organize and chair several UN sponsored environmental conferences as an under secretary general. Still he continued to move in and out of the UN mixing the oil business in his private life with saving the environment in his public UN position. During the 80s an 90s he became a major investor in several companies that were primarily scams, selling his grossly inflated company stock at a huge profit, before they were exposed and went bankrupt. There was also the AWDI incident of 1986. Strong was a major investor in American Water Development Inc.. a company that wanted to drain and sell deep underground water in Saguche County, Colorado. It was opposed by local residents, the State of Colorado, and a number of environmental groups. Eventually AWDI lost its case and had to pay $3 million in court costs.
Despite his Canadian citizenship, Strong often boasted or making major contributions to American presidential campaigns as well as those of other prominent politicians of both parties. This is obviously illegal, but goes on more often than we would like. Obama's campaigns are an excellent example of a candidate taking illegal foreign money. Invariably, this is probably how he first made contact with Al Gore. He considered Gore a pompous dupe, whose father had made lots of money working for Occidental Petroleum after leaving the Senate and who could be used to further his quest for power and money. The two became friends and later business partners. In 1994, Al Gore traveled to Buffalo, New York to make a speech and give Molten Metal Industries, a company in which Strong was a major stock holder, a $35 million grant, much like Obama has done for all of the failing solar energy companies. This grant was allegedly to help expand a process that could separate various metals from waste very inexpensively. When news of the government grant went public, the stock soared over 500%. Unfortunately, a government study found that the process didn't work and shut down funding, but not before Strong sold his shares at a huge profit. This all happened about the time Gore became an environmental guru, predicting an apocalyptic catastrophe in 10 years unless something was done to control human based global warming. (I live in Florida and the intercostal didn't rise above my second story much less my seawall.)
In the 1990s and until 2005, he openly continued his involvement with the UN and at one point was considered next in line to be the Secretary General, but his luck changed. He was finally outed, when Paul Volker audited the corrupt "oil for food" program in Iraq and discovered an endorsed check for $988,885 made out to M. Strong from Saddam Hussein. This check was delivered to him by a South Korean business man, Tongun Park who went to prison for being an unregistered lobbyist for Iraq and bribing UN officials. Strong was forced to resign from his environmental post as well as UN special negotiator to North Korea, from whom he was also probably receiving bribes. Ironically, Strong and none of the other UN officials, who accepted the bribes, including Kofi Annan's son, who also worked for the UN despite its anti nepotism policy, were ever prosecuted. I guess political contributions to both parties and knowledge of much UN corruption paid off.
Although it seemed like he left the UN, he merely moved from New York to Costa Rica to run the UN sponsored University of Peace. This was a perfect spot for Strong. It got him out of the public eye and into a position that had previously accused of corruption and mismanagement. Strong was no different and became involved in an illegal governemnt land deal that put him at odds with the Costa Rican Government.
Eventually he moved to Beijing and became the environmental advisor to the Chinese Communists. In China, he had one failed venture. He and his pal George Soros decided to destroy the American automobile industry, before Obama destroyed it by bailing out the unions instead of the bond holders for GM. (The hourly cost of manpower from wages and benefits made it non competitive and the so called bailout did nothing for this. The other reason was GM manufactured too many unpopular automobiles and that hasn't changed as Obama forced them to come out with the Volt.) The Chinese with financial backing from Strong and Soros began building a car called the "Chery". The cost would be so cheap that it would destroy the competition for low end automobiles (recall the failed Yugo). A trial release in Europe, where cheap fuel efficient cars are a mainstay, failed as the Chery had two many defects and did not live up to its predicted fuel efficiency. It never made it to America.
I could provide many more stories about this amazing villian, but I'm ending Part 2 here and will move on to Part 3 about Al Gore, but you haven't heard the last of Maurice Strong. Part 3 will be published soon. Meanwhile read and pass along.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Hitler's Last Stand: Apocalyptic Global Warming Hoax
Part 1
I have always been skeptical of Global Warming as a manmade phenomenon. With the Earth being millions and millions of years old, brief periods of too hot or too cold have always existed. Even centuries of extreme climate condition mean little in Earth's timeline. The Earth's relationship to the Sun seems to be the most critical for determining significant extremes in our climate as will as other naturally occurring phenomenon. Being something of a scientist myself, and certainly capable of reading and understanding scientific papers published in peer reviewed scientific journals, about 18 months ago I decided to find the scientific article that first proposed Apocalyptic Global Warming. After googling "origin apocalyptic global warming", I was stunned to find virtually none listed, as I scanned through the Google references. Instead, all referred to an article published online on February 15, 2011 on the American Thinker web site by Mark Musser entitled The Nazi Origins of Global Warming. This article spurred my interest in this obvious hoax and so I continued researching the information in the article.
It mentioned a book, Dance with the Devil, written by an Austrian Nazi, Guenther Schwab, 1902-2006, in 1958. Schwab was born in Vienna and despite his parents wishes for him to become a business man or professional, became an Austrian forest ranger and member of the "green" movement. Beside the environmental philosophy of the Green Party, eugenics played a major role in regard to racial purity and population management for early twentieth century greens. In 1924, Schwab began his career in the Austrian wilds as a forest ranger and would have been content to pass his days watching wildlife, but in 1928 he read a book that changed his life. That book was Mein Kampf. He was so taken by it, that he quit his job and moved to Munich and joined Hitler's Brown Shirts (SA, Sturmabteilungen).
Schwab served as a low ranking Nazi officer in a non combat or death camp role during WWII. Because he was a Nazi, he was barred from obtaining any significant work after the war so he turned to writing, penning several children's book about animals. In 1958, his critical work Dance with the Devil was published in German, but at first was sold mostly under the counter because of its controversial subject matter. The book was fiction, an allegory, voicing his concerns about man's, primarily America, destruction of the environment. The Devil, one of the main characters, is portrayed as the stereotype of a corporate CEO, in a well appointed office, somewhat over weight, dressed in an expensive business suit and chomping on a cigar. One by one his underlings report to him how man is destroying the planet in many different ways. He usually tries to back up these claims by referencing real scientific papers. Interestingly, he uses these papers to criticize American and western European capitalism, never Nazi Germany since his reason for writing the book, was his hatred for America and capitalism for defeating Germany and his beloved Fuhrer. One whole chapter, fifteen, was devoted to eugenics and he considers population growth in Asia , Africa, and South America to be the number one reason for the destruction of the planet. Only one paragraph in the entire book, in Chapter 3, refers to carbon based apocalyptic global warming, and without the usual scientific references to back it up. A few 19th and early twentieth century scientists postulated industrial pollution as having a very minor effect on the environment and may have served as the template on which he exaggerated. Gradually his book came out from behind the counter and by 1962 had been translated into 61 different languages including English. Over a million copies were sold and supplied Schwab with enough income to start a foundation, The World League for the Preservation of the Planet. To head his foundation, he appointed his friend and fellow Nazi Werner Haverbeck, who propagandized Hitler Youth during the war and whose wife was a Holocaust denier. These they were also instrumental in forming the German Green Party in the 1980s. So here we have a foundation allegedly for the preservation of the planet run by two Nazis who detest American capitalism.
Naturally, anyone with a hatred for the United States and a fictional book about environmental destruction would become a darling of the United Nations. After cleaning up of his reputation, by ignoring the eugenics chapter in his book (much like Margaret Sanger's reason for starting Planned Parenthood) and his Nazi past, the book became the basis for UN environment policy for years to come and in 2002 he was given a special award by the UN.
At this point the story grew somewhat fuzzy for me. I had to find the link or links from Guenther Schwab to Al Gore in order to find how the hoax was perpetuated. It was obvious to me that a dunce like Al Gore probably never read Dance With the Devil when it was published in English, he was only about 15 at the time. His father would have thrown the book away, since Al Gore Sr. was the an example of the stereotype the book was depicting as the destroyer of the environment. The Gore estate in Tennessee sits on the most polluted stream in Tennessee due to the royalties the family receives from phosphate mining. Senior also went to work for Armand Hammer's Occidental Petroleum after leaving the Senate in 1973. After a little research I found the link, another despicable character who I will tell you about in Part 2.
If you enjoyed this article, please pass it along. Comments both positive or negative are always welcome.
I have always been skeptical of Global Warming as a manmade phenomenon. With the Earth being millions and millions of years old, brief periods of too hot or too cold have always existed. Even centuries of extreme climate condition mean little in Earth's timeline. The Earth's relationship to the Sun seems to be the most critical for determining significant extremes in our climate as will as other naturally occurring phenomenon. Being something of a scientist myself, and certainly capable of reading and understanding scientific papers published in peer reviewed scientific journals, about 18 months ago I decided to find the scientific article that first proposed Apocalyptic Global Warming. After googling "origin apocalyptic global warming", I was stunned to find virtually none listed, as I scanned through the Google references. Instead, all referred to an article published online on February 15, 2011 on the American Thinker web site by Mark Musser entitled The Nazi Origins of Global Warming. This article spurred my interest in this obvious hoax and so I continued researching the information in the article.
It mentioned a book, Dance with the Devil, written by an Austrian Nazi, Guenther Schwab, 1902-2006, in 1958. Schwab was born in Vienna and despite his parents wishes for him to become a business man or professional, became an Austrian forest ranger and member of the "green" movement. Beside the environmental philosophy of the Green Party, eugenics played a major role in regard to racial purity and population management for early twentieth century greens. In 1924, Schwab began his career in the Austrian wilds as a forest ranger and would have been content to pass his days watching wildlife, but in 1928 he read a book that changed his life. That book was Mein Kampf. He was so taken by it, that he quit his job and moved to Munich and joined Hitler's Brown Shirts (SA, Sturmabteilungen).
Schwab served as a low ranking Nazi officer in a non combat or death camp role during WWII. Because he was a Nazi, he was barred from obtaining any significant work after the war so he turned to writing, penning several children's book about animals. In 1958, his critical work Dance with the Devil was published in German, but at first was sold mostly under the counter because of its controversial subject matter. The book was fiction, an allegory, voicing his concerns about man's, primarily America, destruction of the environment. The Devil, one of the main characters, is portrayed as the stereotype of a corporate CEO, in a well appointed office, somewhat over weight, dressed in an expensive business suit and chomping on a cigar. One by one his underlings report to him how man is destroying the planet in many different ways. He usually tries to back up these claims by referencing real scientific papers. Interestingly, he uses these papers to criticize American and western European capitalism, never Nazi Germany since his reason for writing the book, was his hatred for America and capitalism for defeating Germany and his beloved Fuhrer. One whole chapter, fifteen, was devoted to eugenics and he considers population growth in Asia , Africa, and South America to be the number one reason for the destruction of the planet. Only one paragraph in the entire book, in Chapter 3, refers to carbon based apocalyptic global warming, and without the usual scientific references to back it up. A few 19th and early twentieth century scientists postulated industrial pollution as having a very minor effect on the environment and may have served as the template on which he exaggerated. Gradually his book came out from behind the counter and by 1962 had been translated into 61 different languages including English. Over a million copies were sold and supplied Schwab with enough income to start a foundation, The World League for the Preservation of the Planet. To head his foundation, he appointed his friend and fellow Nazi Werner Haverbeck, who propagandized Hitler Youth during the war and whose wife was a Holocaust denier. These they were also instrumental in forming the German Green Party in the 1980s. So here we have a foundation allegedly for the preservation of the planet run by two Nazis who detest American capitalism.
Naturally, anyone with a hatred for the United States and a fictional book about environmental destruction would become a darling of the United Nations. After cleaning up of his reputation, by ignoring the eugenics chapter in his book (much like Margaret Sanger's reason for starting Planned Parenthood) and his Nazi past, the book became the basis for UN environment policy for years to come and in 2002 he was given a special award by the UN.
At this point the story grew somewhat fuzzy for me. I had to find the link or links from Guenther Schwab to Al Gore in order to find how the hoax was perpetuated. It was obvious to me that a dunce like Al Gore probably never read Dance With the Devil when it was published in English, he was only about 15 at the time. His father would have thrown the book away, since Al Gore Sr. was the an example of the stereotype the book was depicting as the destroyer of the environment. The Gore estate in Tennessee sits on the most polluted stream in Tennessee due to the royalties the family receives from phosphate mining. Senior also went to work for Armand Hammer's Occidental Petroleum after leaving the Senate in 1973. After a little research I found the link, another despicable character who I will tell you about in Part 2.
If you enjoyed this article, please pass it along. Comments both positive or negative are always welcome.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Bump in the road turns into a very deep pot hole
The murder of four Americans including our ambassador in Libya may wind up ultimately costing Obama the election. Member of the regime continue to make remarks that are inconsistent with one another. The only thing that is consistent is the main stream media's attempt to hide the truth, by simply not reporting it. The day after it happened, the New York Times claimed that six other stories were more important than the sacking of our consulate in Benghazi and the murder of our ambassador. As usual, Obama unwilling to accept responsibility or at least give the true story on what happened, continues to blame some ridiculous YouTube movie trailer that no one even knew existed as the cause. The media hoped that it had been made by a Tea Party member only to be disappointed when it learned it was a Coptic Christian. By the way, Coptic Christians have been routinely beaten and murdered in post Arab Spring Egypt.
What is so amazing to me is why is the Obama regime trying to cover up what actually happened. Could it be that Obama is ideologically driven that he cannot recognize that radical Muslim terrorism still exists. After Bin Ladin is dead and Al Qaeda has been decimated...in Pakistan, but it is still strong enough to foster blue on green attacks and other acts of terror in Afghanistan. Unfortunately Al Qaeda just picks up and moves when a locale becomes too hot. Al Qaeda is now on the Arabia Penninsula, in the Sudan, Somalia, Egypt, Libya, Mali, and now in Syria fighting against Assad. So much for Obama's apology to the Muslim world and bowing to King Abdulla of Saudi Arabia.
Obama has told us that the war on terror is over, but just because he says its over doesn't means it s over. If you believe its over, then you'll believe that Maj. Nadal Hassan shooting two semiautomatic handguns and screaming "allah akbar" is a work place incident or that the underwear bomber Farouk Abdulmutallab or Times Square bomber Faisal Sharraz acted alone. Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and just about every Democrat surrogate has lied to the American people. Despite knowing almost immediately that this was a terror attack scheduled for September 11, he continued this blatant lie that it was caused by the stupid video when he spoke to the UN a week later. Hillary Clinton also supported this an tried to explain that Ambassador Stevens was helped by some kind Libyans who took him to the hospital. The kind Libyans were his murders who beat, sodomized, stripped, and murdered him. After dragging his dead bloody naked body through the streets of Benghazi, stopping along the way for people to take cell phone photographs, they deposited it at a local hospital.
Then the lies increased. It came out that Ambassador Stevens had requested at least a dozen marines as additional security on multiple occasions for the consulate in Benghazi. The consulate had been attacked twice and its walls breached. The British consulate and Red Cross Mission were closed due to security concerns and yet Steven was turned down by the regime. As usual Obama tried to blame someone else. This time it was the Republican dominated House of Representatives for cutting State Department and Security funding which of course wasn't true. In fact security funds had been increased and the State Department is sitting on $2 billion in unspent funds. The State Department has enough money to waste on two Chevy Volts and a charging station costing $100,000 for the Vienna embassy. (Figuring the Volts cost $35K each, at 12K miles per year and then figure gasoline in Europe at $10 per gallon and a Chevy Cobalt costing 20K and averaging 30 miles per gallon. Even if the electricity to charge the batteries in the Volts cost absolutely nothing, assuming the Cobalt and Volt have roughly the same life span and maintenance costs it would take more than 15 years to cover the additional costs of the Volts. Not a very good investment of tax payer money.) Instead local Libyans were hired for security who led the Americans to a "safe house" when the attack began and then showed the attackers where the Americans were hiding so they could murder them.
Now Hillary Clinton has taken the blame for the lack of a security alert saying she never advised the President. This is also a blatant lie. A State Department said that through technology they watched the attack pn the consulate for 6 hours. Don't you think they told someone who told the President what was going on. Any security concern goes through the NSA and there is a briefing every morning. Obama rarely attends these briefings as campaigning is far more important, just as attending a fund raiser in Las Vegas on 9/11 the day multiple embassies were attack in the Middle East and our Ambassador murdered. Instead of taking the lead our President refused to meet with any world leaders when he was in New York for the UN General Assembly a week later where he continues his ridiculous lie about the stupid video and apologizing to the Moslems again. He did have time to appear on Letterman and The View, but not enough time to meet with Israeli Ambassador Netanyahu who sought a meeting.
The regime meanwhile remains tight lipped about what really happened in Benghazi, claiming it will tell the American people after an investigation that will conveniently take till after the election. These questions need to be answered now. What did President Obama know and when did he know it? Why, after a week. was Susan Rice sent out to lie to the American people? Why was Hillary Clinton lying well after the facts were known? Why did President Obama apologize for a video that was not the cause of the planned attack on the consulate in Benghazi on 9/11 more than a week later at the UN. And finally, why were the Ambassador's security requests turned down?
What is so amazing to me is why is the Obama regime trying to cover up what actually happened. Could it be that Obama is ideologically driven that he cannot recognize that radical Muslim terrorism still exists. After Bin Ladin is dead and Al Qaeda has been decimated...in Pakistan, but it is still strong enough to foster blue on green attacks and other acts of terror in Afghanistan. Unfortunately Al Qaeda just picks up and moves when a locale becomes too hot. Al Qaeda is now on the Arabia Penninsula, in the Sudan, Somalia, Egypt, Libya, Mali, and now in Syria fighting against Assad. So much for Obama's apology to the Muslim world and bowing to King Abdulla of Saudi Arabia.
Obama has told us that the war on terror is over, but just because he says its over doesn't means it s over. If you believe its over, then you'll believe that Maj. Nadal Hassan shooting two semiautomatic handguns and screaming "allah akbar" is a work place incident or that the underwear bomber Farouk Abdulmutallab or Times Square bomber Faisal Sharraz acted alone. Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and just about every Democrat surrogate has lied to the American people. Despite knowing almost immediately that this was a terror attack scheduled for September 11, he continued this blatant lie that it was caused by the stupid video when he spoke to the UN a week later. Hillary Clinton also supported this an tried to explain that Ambassador Stevens was helped by some kind Libyans who took him to the hospital. The kind Libyans were his murders who beat, sodomized, stripped, and murdered him. After dragging his dead bloody naked body through the streets of Benghazi, stopping along the way for people to take cell phone photographs, they deposited it at a local hospital.
Then the lies increased. It came out that Ambassador Stevens had requested at least a dozen marines as additional security on multiple occasions for the consulate in Benghazi. The consulate had been attacked twice and its walls breached. The British consulate and Red Cross Mission were closed due to security concerns and yet Steven was turned down by the regime. As usual Obama tried to blame someone else. This time it was the Republican dominated House of Representatives for cutting State Department and Security funding which of course wasn't true. In fact security funds had been increased and the State Department is sitting on $2 billion in unspent funds. The State Department has enough money to waste on two Chevy Volts and a charging station costing $100,000 for the Vienna embassy. (Figuring the Volts cost $35K each, at 12K miles per year and then figure gasoline in Europe at $10 per gallon and a Chevy Cobalt costing 20K and averaging 30 miles per gallon. Even if the electricity to charge the batteries in the Volts cost absolutely nothing, assuming the Cobalt and Volt have roughly the same life span and maintenance costs it would take more than 15 years to cover the additional costs of the Volts. Not a very good investment of tax payer money.) Instead local Libyans were hired for security who led the Americans to a "safe house" when the attack began and then showed the attackers where the Americans were hiding so they could murder them.
Now Hillary Clinton has taken the blame for the lack of a security alert saying she never advised the President. This is also a blatant lie. A State Department said that through technology they watched the attack pn the consulate for 6 hours. Don't you think they told someone who told the President what was going on. Any security concern goes through the NSA and there is a briefing every morning. Obama rarely attends these briefings as campaigning is far more important, just as attending a fund raiser in Las Vegas on 9/11 the day multiple embassies were attack in the Middle East and our Ambassador murdered. Instead of taking the lead our President refused to meet with any world leaders when he was in New York for the UN General Assembly a week later where he continues his ridiculous lie about the stupid video and apologizing to the Moslems again. He did have time to appear on Letterman and The View, but not enough time to meet with Israeli Ambassador Netanyahu who sought a meeting.
The regime meanwhile remains tight lipped about what really happened in Benghazi, claiming it will tell the American people after an investigation that will conveniently take till after the election. These questions need to be answered now. What did President Obama know and when did he know it? Why, after a week. was Susan Rice sent out to lie to the American people? Why was Hillary Clinton lying well after the facts were known? Why did President Obama apologize for a video that was not the cause of the planned attack on the consulate in Benghazi on 9/11 more than a week later at the UN. And finally, why were the Ambassador's security requests turned down?
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Another Bump in the Road
Hard to believe that a blog I composed on 9/12/12 and 9/13/12 and published the next day was entirely accurate about the horrific events of 9/11/12 at our embassy in Cairo and consulate in Benghazi and contrary to those being force fed to us by the Obama administration. The Obama administration continues to believe that radical Islamic jihad doesn't exist or has been eliminated by his regime. Although I commend him for killing Bin Ladin and targeting Al Qaeda and Taliban in Pakistan with drones, the movement is still active and unfortunately growing. When a locale gets too hot for them, Al Qaeda merely relocates to a safer and more accommodating country such a Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Northern Mali or the Arabian Peninsula. The regime would like us to believe that its foreign policy, with outreach and apologies to the Muslim world, has been effective, but far from it. Muslim populations are primitive in their understanding of diplomacy. Words have little meaning and treaties are only in effect until they are conveniently broken. The only thing that has any meaning in the Middle East is strength and resolve, just the opposite of what Obama has shown, even demonstrating his subservience by bowing to Saudi King Abdullah. There is no respect or fear of Obama in the Middle East. The lack of United States support may even embolden Israel's enemies to attack. Although they hate Israel, they still respect Israel, realizing that the IDF is one of the best trained and equipped fighting forces in the world and willing to fight with real bullets.
For those of you who didn't read my 9/14 blog the real story has been very slow to unfold in the
mainstream media as the regime has done its best to lie to the public about these tragic events. Rather than show any concern or leadership, for Obama it was business as usual, traveling to Las Vegas for a fund raiser. Remember how Bush was criticized for merely flying over New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. One would expect the commander-in-chief to be at his post in the war room at the White House directing the protection of or embassies, consulates, and their personnel throughout the world. His behavior and lack of concern were predictable, especially after he considered the sodomization and murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Stevens a "bump in he road" I'm certain that their families appreciate Obama's kind words. If demonstrators knew that the marines were instructed to shoot to kill anyone who violated our sovereign grounds, they may have been discouraged before these well planned actions began. Ambassador Hillary Clinton initially praised the murderers for dropping their victims at a hospital in Benghazi. Of course this was only after they dragged the violated dead bodies through the streets, stopping for anyone who wanted to take a photograph with their cell phones. Hillary had dug a deep enough hole for herself and probably didn't want to dig it any deeper so UN Ambassador Susan Rice, obviously instructed what to say by Obama, lied four days later on the Sunday morning talk shows that these were spontaneous peaceful demonstrations that got out of hand and that a little known and viewed video by a Coptic Christian was the cause. Yes, Ambassador Rice, spontaneous demonstrators usually bring mortars and rpgs to spontaneous peaceful demonstrations along with black Al Qaeda flags. Worst of all President Obama apologized again at the UN about the video, but how can Muslims expect anyone to respect their religion, when they respect no one else's. Mixed messages are still being given out by the regime who sadly wanted to tell the electorate that war on terror is over (as if they ever recognized that it existed at all).
With Obama's Middle East foreign policy in shambles the media and Obama's liar in chief, David Axelrod continue to blame Romney for acting presidential accusing him of "shooting first and asking questions later". The media can no longer claim neutrality and only reluctantly has started to ask important questions of the regime, especially after it has come to light that they were warned about these impending attacks and the lack of security, particularly at our consulate in Benghazi. Amazing as it may sound, requests for beefed up security in Benghazi were turned down.
Congress has now taken up this issue and wants some answers. Ambassador Rice may fall on her sword and resign. Hillary has been asked to testify. This is really turning into "Benghazigate". Look for the regime to ignore or delay any testimony until after the election. Forget about request for documents, they're not to be answered. Look for Hillary to be sent on some prolong foreign adventure in a remote corner of the world in the name of foreign policy. Meanwhile the mainstream media will continue to support Obama.
Obama's immigration policy or lack of it is in the news again, with a border agent being murdered and another wounded in a shoot out with drug or human smugglers not far from where another agent was killed with a gun from the "fast and furious" sting blunder. For Obama they are only "bumps in the road", a road that has suddenly turned a lot bumpier.
For those of you who didn't read my 9/14 blog the real story has been very slow to unfold in the
mainstream media as the regime has done its best to lie to the public about these tragic events. Rather than show any concern or leadership, for Obama it was business as usual, traveling to Las Vegas for a fund raiser. Remember how Bush was criticized for merely flying over New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. One would expect the commander-in-chief to be at his post in the war room at the White House directing the protection of or embassies, consulates, and their personnel throughout the world. His behavior and lack of concern were predictable, especially after he considered the sodomization and murder of four Americans, including Ambassador Stevens a "bump in he road" I'm certain that their families appreciate Obama's kind words. If demonstrators knew that the marines were instructed to shoot to kill anyone who violated our sovereign grounds, they may have been discouraged before these well planned actions began. Ambassador Hillary Clinton initially praised the murderers for dropping their victims at a hospital in Benghazi. Of course this was only after they dragged the violated dead bodies through the streets, stopping for anyone who wanted to take a photograph with their cell phones. Hillary had dug a deep enough hole for herself and probably didn't want to dig it any deeper so UN Ambassador Susan Rice, obviously instructed what to say by Obama, lied four days later on the Sunday morning talk shows that these were spontaneous peaceful demonstrations that got out of hand and that a little known and viewed video by a Coptic Christian was the cause. Yes, Ambassador Rice, spontaneous demonstrators usually bring mortars and rpgs to spontaneous peaceful demonstrations along with black Al Qaeda flags. Worst of all President Obama apologized again at the UN about the video, but how can Muslims expect anyone to respect their religion, when they respect no one else's. Mixed messages are still being given out by the regime who sadly wanted to tell the electorate that war on terror is over (as if they ever recognized that it existed at all).
With Obama's Middle East foreign policy in shambles the media and Obama's liar in chief, David Axelrod continue to blame Romney for acting presidential accusing him of "shooting first and asking questions later". The media can no longer claim neutrality and only reluctantly has started to ask important questions of the regime, especially after it has come to light that they were warned about these impending attacks and the lack of security, particularly at our consulate in Benghazi. Amazing as it may sound, requests for beefed up security in Benghazi were turned down.
Congress has now taken up this issue and wants some answers. Ambassador Rice may fall on her sword and resign. Hillary has been asked to testify. This is really turning into "Benghazigate". Look for the regime to ignore or delay any testimony until after the election. Forget about request for documents, they're not to be answered. Look for Hillary to be sent on some prolong foreign adventure in a remote corner of the world in the name of foreign policy. Meanwhile the mainstream media will continue to support Obama.
Obama's immigration policy or lack of it is in the news again, with a border agent being murdered and another wounded in a shoot out with drug or human smugglers not far from where another agent was killed with a gun from the "fast and furious" sting blunder. For Obama they are only "bumps in the road", a road that has suddenly turned a lot bumpier.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)