More on General Flynn, President Trump's Tax Reform Package, and New Info on the Terrible Iran Deal.

      The Democrats don't want to let the appointment and firing of General Michael Flynn go away.  As it turns out, he violated a security clearance agreement he signed by accepting money from Russian and Turkish sources without clearing it through the Defense and State Departments first.  (Flynn, through his attorney, has said he did have it cleared.) The Democrats are very critical that the Trump if he won the election. administration failed to vet Flynn adequately, especially with a security check.  As it turns out,  his security clearance was renewed in 2016 by the Obama administration.  President Trump's spokesman, Sean Spicer,  has said that this recent security clearance was accepted as it often is from one administration to the next.  Was Flynn granted his clearance by Obama henchmen despite knowing he failed to report income from foreign sources so that it could be used to attack and embarrass President Trump. This opens a problem for the Democrats as he was cleared first by the Obama regime despite the so called violations.  Obama officials obviously failed to do their job.  The Flynn investigation has turned into a ridiculous investigation of whether the Russia intentionally helped President Trump win the election, as the Democrats can't accept that Hillary Clinton was a terrible unlikeable candidate, with no real message, and a poorly managed campaign.  What has been learned from the investigation has opened a can of worms for the Democrats with serious criminal implications.  As it turns out Flynn and other members of President Trump's team have been the subject of potentially illegal surveillance and unveiling of American citizens.  Chronic immoral prevaricator Susan Rice a political member of the NSC (a position that did not have to be approved by the Senate) now admits to unveiling many of the Trump team after first denying she knew anything about it. She still denies having leaked his name.  If she didn't leak the name, it was certainly her assistant and very political appointee, Ben Rhodes.  Both Valerie Jarrett and Obama had to know and approve.  It will be interesting if he falls on his sword to protect his bosses.  The monetary payoff would have to be significant.
      President Trump has offered an amazing tax reform plan.  Details are not totally clear yet. but what is known seems great as it will prevent the government from confiscation of the hard earned money from the middle class and will promote and increase jobs.  Importantly it will allow corporations to repatriate  trillions of dollars, that can be used to expand business, create more jobs, and reward shareholders with buybacks and dividends.  Workers will get raises in some instances and so not only with they take home more because of a raise, but also more because taxes will be less.  The business tax rate including Subchapter S Corporations at 15%  It keeps the mortgage and  charitable deductions.  Rates would be 10%, 25, and 35%, though the income levels have not be released. Interesting the plan does away with deductions for local and state taxes.  Screw you New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and California you should have voted for President Trump.  He has doubled the personal deduction and done away with the alternative minimum tax.  Stupid Harpy, Nancy Pelosi, has already panned the plan although she hasn't even seen it. Maybe she should vote for it so she could find out what's in it like she said about the abomination known as Obamacare. Her typically Democrat propaganda claims its only for the rich and will increase the debt by $5.5 trillion.  That bothers her, but Obama increasing the debt by more than $10 trillion was okay. Chucky Schumer also doesn't like it as well, same propaganda.  It would be nice to hear politicians talk about cutting the size and cost of government.  The President is trying to make government more efficient as any businessman would about his business.

      More bad news for America continues to emerge from the Obama regime's  reckless deal with Iran.  We already know that it ranks as the absolute worst deal since Neville Chamberlain"s ill fated deal with Hitler. for "peace in our time," that brought about WW2.  Beside the seven Iranian prisoners released that we knew about (they were serving time for espionage and illegal procurement crimes, fourteen international, interpol "red" warrants were dropped for individuals who were under indictment for similar crimes.  One of those released by Obama was an Iranian who designed IEDs of the type used in Iraq that had killed American soldiers. As pointed out in a previous blog, John Kerry did not reveal or recuse himself from these negotiations with his Iranian counterpart with who he had a personal relationship through his daughter's wedding. Of course no one in the Obama administration has ever recused themselves including Loretta Lynch who secretly met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at an Arizona airport a few days before the FBI was to announce its findings in its investigation of Hillary Clinton.  This new found information added to what we already know.  The regime not only released billions of dollars it was holding in escrow in American banks, but secretly sent a plane load of $14 billion in cash.  It dropped sanctions and did not, according to Obama, ask for a prisoner swap, though some Americans were released, one was not.  The Iranians weren't even required to give up all of their centrifuges or allow for unscheduled inspections.  Military bases were off limits altogether for inspection.  Finally we have learned after the deal Kerry traveled all over Europe encouraging European companies to do business with Iran. If you think Iran has halted its quest for nuclear weapons, then you probably believed that if you liked your doctor, you could keep your doctor and if you liked your health insurance plan, you could keep your health insurance plan.  It also continues missile development using technology that it has obtained from China via Bill Clinton's traitorous approval allowing missile guidance guidance technology to be sold to the Red Chinese Army (for $20 million of illegal campaign donations) and it continues to support Bashar Assad in Syria and terrorist organizations Hezbollah as well as those in Palestine.
      This is the sixth year of blogging and I appreciate your support.  Continue to pass these onto your friends.
   
 

High Crimes and Hypocrisy

      Now that Justice Neil Gorsuch has been sworn in as an associate justice of the US Supreme Court, the Democrat hypocrisy affecting his Senate confirmation is a thing of the past and only worth talking about from the sense that when Harry Reid was Majority Leader of the Senate, he turned the rules on its head and so it is only appropriate that the Democrats got some of their own medicine. In my lifetime only a two nominees were voted down, Clement Haynesworth and G. Harold Carswell, both Nixon nominees.  At least a half dozen were rejected prior to a vote, most notable Robert Bork, a Reagen nominee. Democrats were upset that the Republican controlled Senate did not give Obama nominee Merrick Garland a hearing to replace Antonin Scalia who may have died under uncertain circumstances.  Prior to the 1992 presidential election, Joe Biden, chairman of the senate judicial committee,  in an impassioned speech,  said that if a justice resigned during the summer of an election year, no one should be nominated until after the elections.  Again Democrat hypocrisy rears its ugly head. Control of the Senate flipped during the past eight years and now the Republicans adopted what was termed the "Biden Rule." The 2016 presidential election was also about the Supreme Court as Donald Trump had released a list of potential choices during the campaign.
      I hope I am not being too repetitious when I want to reiterate what is going on with Susan Rice.  Since joining government, despite being positions that were to be unpolitical, Rice has always been very political.  She first served in various capacities with the NSC during the Clinton administration where she began her career of provarication and obscuration.  During the genocide being carried out in Rwanda, she advised to condemn it, but not to call it genocide as Clinton was planning not to do anything of substance about it and that it may affect up coming elections.  A few years later, she was rewarded by the Clinton regime, being appointed as Assistant Secretary of African Affairs in 1995.  In this position she, Madeline Albright, and Assistant Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, prevented our dealing with Sudan in 1997, when they wanted to turn over their intelligence on Osama Ben Ladin, as he had lived in Suden until 1995 until he was expelled.  They did not want the CIA and FBI talking to one another.  Though Rice was involved, it was Gorelick who had been stupidly appointed to the 911 Commission, who lied about not allowing FBI and CIA to talk,  protecting the Clinton Regime.

      She launched a brief limited successful career after Bush was elected. In 2008, she abandoned Clinton and became a Senior Policy Advisor to the Obama campaign, a position she has held with the John Kerry campaign. After Obama was elected, she was named Ambassador to the UN.  Willing to do and say anything, she was marched out on six Sunday news shows after the attack and slaughter of four Americans at Benghazi. She knowingly lied that the consulate attack was part of a spontaneous demonstration over an obscure anti Muslim video and that Al Qaeda was on the run.  This was done to support Obama's run for a second presidential term in 2012.  As a reward, she wanted to become Secretary of State to replace HRC, but having become such a controversial person,  he appointed her as a National Security Advisor, a position that did not require Senate confirmation.
      In her new position, Susan Rice continued to support the Obama regime politically spreading lies and shielding Obama from any criticism. After imposing a "red line" in Syria and failing to act when Assad gassed his own people, and then failing to act, Rice, Kerry, and Obama stressed that all of the stores of gas had been removed through diplomacy.  As we have learned, this was obviously not true. In addition, she and her NSA advisor Ben Rhodes also emphasized the success of the Iran deal even though we all know to the contrary.  During the selling of the nuclear agreement, she was sent to Israel and attacked Netanyahu with aggressive rhetoric and continue Obama's ill founded and hateful policy to Israel.

      Now we have learned that Rice's position was a National Security Advisor was purely political, making certain that Obama's potential political enemies were surveilled and intel information reported back to Obama and leaked when it could be damaging.  And if Rice did not personally leaked the material, her assistant Bed Rhodes, surly did.  Russian influence on the election was used as a cover for the surveillance  and as an excuse for HRC's loss.  Normally the names of American citizens incidentally picked up in foreign surveillance are redacted and only unmasked if absolutely necessary for security purposes.  Unmasking is very infrequent, but as it turns out, Rice requested unmasking of a number of Trump's campaign and post campaign associates. Though she may be able to get away with the unmasking, as she is already saying it was to understand the documents she was reading,  leaking of those names is serious felony and the name of Trump's first choice to run the NSA,  General Flynn.
      Democrats rarely show any foresight into their policies and actions. Calling for the Russia investigation with our elections is going to bite them in the ass.  There is no evidence that President Trump or any of his team colluded with the Russians over the election and yet now the Rice, Rhoades,  Jarrett, and Obama surveillance crimes will be investigated and someone may go to prison.   It will be fun to see who is going to sacrifice prison time to save Obama's ass.

Democrat Hypocrisy Part 2

      Probably the most obvious and important example of recent Democratl hypocrisy is the ridiculous hoopla over Russian's interfering with our 2016 presidential election.  As we are well aware, Democrats still can't believe that HRC lost, despite the fact that she was a horrible candidate, who ran a pathetically out of date and out of touch campaign, with no real plan for the future except vote for me, I'm a woman.  Hacking by ? turned up some very revealing information about her and those involved with her campaign.  During the primaries, Democrat Party operatives, who were supposed to stay neutral, cheated by aiding her campaign against Bernie Sanders.  This knowledge certainly alienated some Sanders supporters who may not have voted for HRC or Trump, but decided to stay home election day or vote for a third party candidate.  Revealing emails from HRC's campaign manager, John Podesta, also gave voters insight into the candidates feelings about the "little" people whose vote she sought.  Rather than fight this damaging information, the Clinton campaign decided to attack the messenger, since they could not really attack the message.  Though the messenger in most cases was Wikileaks, HRC tried to blame the Russians.  If Donna Brazille, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, John Podesta, and other Clinton operatives had not done or said what they did, there would have been nothing for Wikileaks or anyone else to report.  Voters don't like liars, cheats, and criminal activity.  HRC could never get out from under the Benghazi coverup, the corrupt Clinton Foundation, and her stupid comments about "deplorables" and coal miners.  Her support for President Obama's policies including Obamacare, high taxes, and anti business and Wall Street speeches didn't help her either.

      After Trump won the election, in an effort to delegitimize the Trump Presidency, the Democrats continued on this shameful lie of Russian interference, as if it made any difference at all.  All the intelligence agencies were quick to reply that the voting process was not interfered with and Democrat attempts at recounts were totally unsuccessful. George Soros trying to fix the vote has more credibility. They then attacked the electoral process, whereas electors, not voters decide the presidential election.  This has been part of our Constitution for 200 years and that many presidents have won with less than 50% of the vote.  The electors were put into the Constitution for a purpose, to give importance to all states and voters, otherwise campaigning in a half a dozen or so large states would be all that was necessary.  Voters only get one shot and if there is a tie or no one gets a majority of voters, the House of Representatives decides happened in the election of 1800 when after 3 dozen ballots on the HOR, Jefferson was selected over Aaron Burr.
      Despite controlling both houses of Congress and the Presidency, the Republicans have stupidly let the Democrats dictate investigations into Russian involvement with Trump and his team.  The Republicans should have said okay, we will also investigate the Clinton campaign including the selling of US Uranium to the Russians for a $145 million contribution through a shell Canadian charity to the Clinton Foundation and hacking of the illegal server.  Should they also investigate Obama was his comments on an open mike to Russian President Medvedev about having more leeway after the election.  The Democrats have called for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself, though I didn't hear any of this for Loretta Lynch, when her clandestine meeting with Bill Clinton on an Arizona airport tarmac.  Lynch, a Clinton appointee as a government prosecutor, appeared as a minimum to have a conflict of interest.  No investigation was requested, despite the serious criminal and traitorous activity that  was reported by the FBI investigation. No one who heard Director James Comey's presentation, could deny that the fix was in.  There was no call to investigate the Russians for hacking HRC's illegal State Department server.  In fact the Democrats tried to prevent any investigation.
      The Democrats are even calling for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate President Trump and a number of his appointees. It must be noted that despite very serious scandals during the Obama regime, no special prosecutors were allowed.  The Justice Department, headed by the corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder, was even permitted to investigate itself over the "fast and furious" debacle. Naturally nothing ever came of that investigation even though several murders in the United States, including one of a border agent, were traced to weapons involved in the scandal.  none were appointed for Benghazi, IRS, the VA, the $6 billion missing from the Clinton  State Department, and crony capitalism for grants to failing companies of Obama campaign financial supporters and bundlers.  We can even go back to the second Clinton regime, where Janet Reno protected scumbag Terry McAuliff from a senate investigation into organizing a union sponsored money laundering scheme to fund the Clinton reelection.  Union officials went to jail, but McAuliff wasn't even questioned.  I doubt if a real investigation of McAuliffe was carried out by Reno's DOJ.
      Now it seems like the Democrats have opened up a can of worms that may come to involve  Obama and ranking members of his regime in serious criminal activity.  President Trump was seriously criticized for claiming that the Obama regime tapped his phones, but although his phones were not necessarily tapped, it is obvious that surveillance was performed of the incoming President and his appointees starting a year before the actual election.  First we learned that Mike Flynn, who was selected to head the NSA, had conversations with the Russians.  He was fired by Trump, not for the communications, but lying to VP Pence about it. How did that information make its way to the media is something the Democrats are trying to ignore. As we have learned in the last few days, it seems that unmasking of US citizens who just happen to be President Trump and his appointees and associates, has been on going by the Obama regime. I won't speculate on the legality of this, though the leaking of General Flynn's name to the media is a felony.  Although she has previously denied any knowledge of unmasking, lying political hack, Susan Rice has been definitely identified as specifically requested the unmasking of Trump and his associates and keeping and possibly disseminating a spread sheet of their phone calls..  When this is analyzed with the comments that Rep. Devon Nunes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has stated that the surveillance material that he reviewed was not about Russia and of low intelligence value, it may have been the Obama regime's method of getting around FISA regulations.  Former Obama StateDepartment official Evelyn Farkas admitted on MSNBC that intelligence needed to be gathered on the future Trump administration.  Just before leaving the White House Obama eased regulations protecting American citizens.  NSA info could be passed on to all of the other intelligence agencies.  Now we know why. The question now is whether Susan Rice will fall on her sword to protect Obama or give up him and other high ranking official within the regime.  We all know of her loyalty to Obama, who rewarded her with a promotion to the NSA after she lied about Benghazi and continued to lie about Beau Bergdahl.  Though the investigation of President Trump and his appointees' relationship to Russia will turn up nothing that will matter, we don't hear anything from the Democrats about investigating Obama's spying on the Trump campaign and transition.  The leaker or leakers could spend considerable time in prison.  One name that comes to mind is another liar and man without morals, Ben Rhodes, Rice's assistant at the NSA.

     Lastly we have learned that perpetual scum bag Terry McAuliff has raised his ugly head again and may have bought the assistant FBI director Andrew McCabe.  McCabe's wife, a Democrat, was running for the Virginia state senate in 2016 and McAuliff, a key Clinton crony, arranged for $700K to be given to her campaign. With that kind of money it would have been appropriate for  McCabe to recuse himself from any investigation involving the Trump team, especially as he has done so when investigations involved Virginia politicians.  Instead he apparently paid for a fake dossier on Trump that British agent Christopher Steele collected. The dossier was so inaccurate and untrue that when it was  leaked to the media,  only Buzzfeed.com published it.
      In my opinion, the investigation will uncover no important information about President Trump and his administration in regard to collision with Russia, though Democrats and the mainstream media will continue to try to make something out of nothing.  Instead, we will learn that Obama and his surrogates illegally spied on the Trump campaign and transition and illegally leaked their information.  Who goes to prison is still in question.
      Next blog will be my take on Democrat hypocrisy in the nomination and confirmation of Judge Gorsuch.

Democrat Party Hypocrisy

      I know it has been a long time since I published a blog.  Things have happened so fast that it has been hard to keep up.  I apologize and will try to finish up relevant ones I've started plus continue with new ones. Please keep up your loyal readership and pass them on to friends.    
      Liberals and the Democrat Party in its effort to have President Donald Trump fail have shown an unprecedented level of hypocrisy that can hurt America, but I doubt if they care. Except on the coasts filled with elitists, the rest of the country has spoken and had not only given the Republicans the White House, but majorities in both houses of Congress. In addition, 2/3 of governorships and most state legislatures are run by a Republican majority.  Analysts have stated that the reason for such an overwhelming victory for President Trump and the Republicans is that the Democrats had a poor strategy, bad candidate(s), and of course the excuse they favor, Russian interference. There is some truth to the two former reasons and none to the later.  In fact, if anything, the Russians would have wanted HRC to win as they have already found that she can be bought, as she accepted $145 million funneled through a  Canadian charity to the Clinton Foundation to sell US Uranium to the Russians.  This is nothing new for the Clintons, as Bill sold missile guidance technology to the Red Chinese army in 1996 for $20 million in illegal campaign contributions.  There was no demand for investigations by the Democrat party for any of these crimes of treason.  I believe that it has become more and more apparent that hypocrisy has caused the coalitions that make up the support for the Democrat Party to fall apart as those within some of these groups have begun to see the light.
      Though African Americans still support the Democrat Party in huge numbers, they have begun to realize that they are at the bottom of the ladder within the Democrat Party.  The Democrat Part wants to keep African Americans in their place as victims needing government support to survive.  Though they give speeches about education, they favor the teachers' union over their black constituency, taking away vouchers from those exceptional students who had the opportunity for a superb education that would provide the opportunity to become future leaders.  By favoring the unions, Democrats support keeping bad teachers employed even if they don't teach, but are put up in warehouses as in New York City, valuable resources are denied to money starved communities.  The denial of quality primary education, means that African Americans need to rely on affirmative action, a very destructive program that results in tokenism.  With a great primary education there would be no need for affirmative action,
      The support of illegal immigration also significantly affects the African American community. Nearly all illegal immigrants are unskilled and willing to work for less than unskilled African Americans whose education or lack of it puts them in direct competition for jobs. It also forces African Americans to vie with illegals for education and even welfare benefits, as illegals share the funds for both.  If President Trump can provide jobs, improve educational opportunities, and reduce crime, it may prove a game changer for the Republican Party.  The Black Caucus is running scared for their jobs as a successful Trump plan for there communities would put them out of work.
       Democrats ignore the high crime levels and in particular the murder rate.  Some of the crime involves African America gangs warring with Latin gangs, consisting mostly of illegal from south of our border.  Poor education and lack of jobs are responsible for directing young African males into crime and turn women to welfare.  Yet it is hypocrisy for Democrats and Obama to want to empty our prisons and put these criminals back into the community.  Is it any wonder that the murder rate is so high?  Democrats push gun control, and yet do not want to support the laws that are already on the books. Members of the NRA are not the ones committing crimes and gun violence in our Democrat controlled inner cities.  Despite the alarming death rate due to narcotic addition, Obama committed sentences for nearly a thousand drug dealers. What does he expect these criminals are going to do when they hit the streets again, sell bubble gum?  Finally legalizing recreational marijuana will create malaise within the African American community as it more readily available, hurting job performance for those that can get jobs and denying jobs to those who test positive.  Yet the elitist liberals, who back gun control and open borders, have houses surrounded by fences and walls with guard dogs and armed body guards for their personal protection.  Signs reading "armed response" are ubiquitous in Beverly Hills, California.
       If it weren't for the money that they could donate to the Democrat Party, Jews would be abandoned by the Democrat Party as well.  Only ignorant or self hating Jews could have tolerated Obama's anti Semitism and hatred for Israel.  Congressman Ellison a Jew hating Muslim from Minnesota, has garnered enough support that he almost became DNC chairman.  Israel was originally written out of the Democrat Party platform in 2012 and was only put back in by a questionable voice vote.  As a result, Jews are starting to abandon the Democrat Party.
       The Democrats also exhibit a similar hypocrisy when it comes to women. Muslim refugees are supported over American women.  The Muslim religion and its Sharia Law treats women as little more than slaves, whose main purpose is to supply their husbands with sex and male children while cooking, cleaning, and keeping quiet like a good little slave. It is obvious that the main problem that European countries have had with an influx of Muslim immigrants and refugees is a total lack of assimilation, except when it comes to accepting welfare benefits.  Our experience is pretty much the same.  Some in Muslim communities, have proven to be vulnerable to radicalization and terrorist activities. If there was a consensus in the world to get rid of terrorism, there would be far fewer Muslim immigrants and no refugees.  NATO has failed to act in an effective way, and now we are all paying the price.  Thank Obama and his ilk.
      It is astonishing that the Democrats are calling for a special prosecutor to investigate the Trump Administration over contacts with Russia.  Let's see, let me count the special prosecutors that were impaneled during Obama's regime. Despite "Fast and Furious", Benghazi, IRS targeting of conservatives, disappearance of billions of State Department funds, the Clinton email server, the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department, the misuse of Obamacare funds, and grants to "green" companies that were headed for bankruptcy, not a single special prosecutor was called for by the Democrats.  And we all remember Obama's comments over a live mike to Medvedev before the 2012 elections.  Did the Russians cause Obama to get elected in 2012? Lets impanel a special prosecutor.
      Along with freedom of speech, the right to vote is fundamental to living in a free society.  A photo identification of some sort is necessary for many other rights and privileges such a travel, purchasing alcohol, tobacco, or a gun and driving an automobile.  My bank requires me to show a photo ID when cashing a check for my own money, yet somehow liberals are opposed to a photo ID for voting, even when the cost is free.  I wonder how many voters do not carry some form of personal identification.  I don't hear liberals complaining about showing an ID to TSA to fly commercially or allowing just anyone to purchase a gun which is a right according to the Second Amendment.  I guess if you want more votes than registered voters in a precinct a photo ID would be a bad idea.  Liberals also oppose cleansing the voting rolls of the dead and people no longer residing in the precinct.  In cities like Chicago dead people have voted for a hundred years and its always for the Democrat candidate.
      Finally liberal and Democrat hypocrisy over global warming, seems to support that it is more about controlling energy and the economy, than about protecting the planet.  One might think that advocates of this false and dangerous concept would support their position by doing what they want all of us to do, altering our life styles.  Instead they are some of the biggest carbon users.  Obama was the worst, flying around the country just to give a speech he could have given in the Oval office, or flying to NYC for a date night with his wife.  He and his wife also took separate airplanes to their vacation destinations.  Jet fuel emits lots of carbon dioxide.  Al Gore would never modify his life style, using private jets and limos on his worldwide jaunts and most recently, we have learned about the ultimate hypocrisy in that Leonardo DiCaprio, another elitist liberal supporter of global warming, flew a beautician 7500 miles round trip to make certain his eyebrows looked good at the academy awards.
      I know that I could also site some examples of Republican hypocrisy as well, especially when it comes to taxes and spending, though not on a scale like the Democrats.  Stand by for part 2.

The Source of Obama's Antisemitism and Hatred of Israel

                                               The child is father of the man
                                                      William Wordsworth (from:"My Heart Leaps Up When I Behold"}


      Happy, healthy, and prosperous New Year to all.  The first post of 2017 is about the disastrous decision that was made right before Christmas by Obama himself.  On December 23, 2016,  he decided to double down on the worst foreign policy in the history of the United States.  He vicously  thrust a dagger into the heart of Israel during a vote at the UN Security Council.  The United States had always protected Israel with its veto power, but as a lame duck president, Obama made it clear what his true feelings about Jews and Israel have been all along. I have frequently commented on this, but some review of Obama's life history will make it easier to understand why the policy he has followed from the onset of his regime in 2008 is completely predictable,  The decision to abstain over UN resolution 2334  delegitimized Israeli settlements in the West Bank, in East Jerusalem, and Israeli claim to the most holy site in the Jewish religion, the Holy Temple Western Wall.  In fact, Israel claims that Obama helped fashion this resolution, a claim which will be made public and verified on or shortly after January 20, 2017 when Obama is gone for good.
      As a child, Obama was raised in a Muslim country, Indonesia, the country with the largest Muslim population.  In Djakarta, he attended a Muslim school. The school was such that one had to be a Muslim and an Indonesian citizen to attend.  He was apparently adopted by his mother's second husband Lolo Soetero to make this happen.  In the Muslim religion, the children are considered to be the religion of the father.  His supposed real father, Barack Obama Sr, was also a Muslim, but was not  observant and a dead beat father and husband as he was a heavy scotch drinker, who practiced bigamy,  beat some of his wives and offered no support to the eight children he fathered.  Eventually Jr. returned to Hawaii with his mother, who shortly thereafter left him in the care of his grandparents.  As a teen, he was mentored by Frank Davis, an admitted CPUSA member and drinking buddy of his grandfather.  Some argue that Davis was his real father, but I'll leave that for you to research and decide for yourself. Besides giving the young man a  communist education, he was responsible for Obama moving to Chicago after graduating from Columbia.  Obama was immediately accepted into the far left community of socialists, communists, and anarchists because of his close ties to Davis.
      Let's go back to Columbia, as I'm getting a little ahead of myself.   Attending as Barry Soetero,  young Obama used his Indonesian passport as the identity that allowed him to be accepted to Columbia for his junior year as an international student, though a B- student at Occidental College.  It also helped him obtain financial assistance available to international students.  At Columbia his favorite professor was Edward Said, professor of Mideast Studies.  Understanding him will help you to understand Obama. Some years before, Said wrote a book entitled Orientalism  about his version of the post colonial Middle East, making it seem like a battle between the people of color, the Arabs, and the Whites or Jews,  and to Obama, similar to that taking place in the civil rights movement in America.  Arab and Palestinian terrorism was justified as they brought recognition of the cause.  The creation of Israel was an extension of European imperialism.  This concept obviously denied almost 5000 years of continuous Jewish habitation of the region.  Islam only dates back to the 7th century.  Based on Said's teachings, Obama speeches about Israel have denied  Jewish history as well.  Eventually Said's book became discredited as Said was not the person he pretended to be in the book and some of the content turned out to be fiction.
      At Columbia, Obama's two roommates were Pakistani Muslims, Chandroo and Hamid.  In 1981, he traveled to Pakistan to allegedly visit them during Ramadan. He also may have visited his mother and half sister in Djakarta as well. Obama has always been tight lipped about this trip and didn't even mention it until 2006. Did he just visit friends? Was he radicalized? I'll let you be the judge. What is also interesting about the trip is that it was very difficult, but not impossible to get to Pakistan with an American passport, but much easier with one from Indonesia.  Few people remember Obama at Columbia, probably because he went by a different name, Barry Soetero.
      After graduation, he identified as Barack Obama again and headed for Chicago to work as a community organizer for ACORN and specifically at the Altgeld Gardens Housing Project during an effort to rid the complex of asbestos and the surrounding landfills of hazardous materials.  This campaign began well before Obama's arrival on the Southside and continued well after he moved on.  Because his introduction by Frank Davis Obama was quickly accepted into a closely knit group of leftists and anti Semites.  Among these included Louis Farakkhan, leader of the Nation of Islam and Rashid Khalidi professor of Mideast Studies at the University of Chicago who later replace Edward Said at Columbia. Alice Palmer, local politician and CPUSA member,  unrepentant murderer Bill Ayers, and Valerie Jarrett were three others.  Rev. Jeremiah Wright came a bit later.  (in case you were unaware Ayres and his wife Bernadette Dorn helped sponsor the infamous flotilla carrying weapons and tunnel supplies to Gaza from Turkey that was intercepted by the Israeli Navy.)
      Therefore Obama's foreign policy toward Israel and Muslims can easily be explained by his past.
Here is brief partial list of this misguided foreign policy.  His first trip was an apology tour to Arabs and Muslims in Cairo.  He then bowed down to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and made Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu wait while he consumed a leisurely dinner.  He sent over his political team to try to sway Israeli elections. He always equated West Bank settlements with rocket attacks, terror tunnels, and terror attacks against Israeli citizens and he can't say radical Islamic terror.  The terrible Iranian deal topped it off as now Iran has billions to fund its anti Israel terrorists.  Choosing John Kerry as Secretary of State, despited his family ties to Iran.  His defense of Muslims in the United States, but his failure to say a word about antisemitism on our college campuses including his alma mater Columbia, one of the worst offenders.
      It will take a major deal to get this UN declaration reversed as both Russia and China would veto any US resolution to that effect.  What can Americans do?  They can write off Obama as a big mistake making hatred for America and Israel his actual legacy,  American Jews should stop funding the Democrat Party.  So what can Trump do?  He already disavowed Obama's infamy. The easiest thing he could do immediately is remove the weapons sanctions that Obama has tied to the Israelis and second and most important, move the US embassy to Jerusalem,  even build one in East Jerusalem, that would be a good start.  That would say something to the World, the UN. Muslims, and Obama and his ilk, especially George Soros.
   
 

Democrat Hypocrisy

       Since this may be my last blog of 2016, I would like to wish you all a very happy and joyous holiday season.  The new year 2017 should bring us much happiness as we will be getting rid of the most harmful president in the history of the country.  I would like to thank you, my loyal followers, for your continual support.  With your help, my readership has grown to over 1000 and with your continued support and sharing of my blog, it will continue to grow. 

      The Democrats and a few Republicans are critical of Donald Trump's nominee Rex Tillerson for Secretary of State.  Objections seem to center around Tillerson's dealings with Russia. As CEO of Exxon, he negotiated deals with the Russian state owned oil company Rosneft.  As a result he was awarded a Russian Medal of Friendship.  A number of American have been awarded this medal since its inception around 1990 by Boris Yeltsin.  Americans that have received the award include the pianist Van Cliburn, Russian Museum of Art (Minneapolis) founder Raymond Johnson and other business people, historians, and an anthropologist.  Like Johnson, some never met Putin and the award doesn't imply close ties to the man.
     Both of Obama's Secretaries of State had much more serious issues  that should have been disqualifiers.  Hillary Clinton's ties to the Clinton Foundation were clearly a serious issue and despite her claiming to separate herself that was just not the case.  Pay for play ruled the day at the State Department and contributions to the foundation often accompanied face time with Secretary Clinton and many times the approval of arms sales.  Though she signed an agreement for Obama that she would separate herself from the Clinton Foundation, it was just for show as she continued to act as its agent and use of her private server were done with both Obama's knowledge and tacit approval.  Some of her State Department staff were also employed by the Clinton Foundation, which was illegal.
      John Kerry had a more serious conflict that he failed to disclose during the Senate Hearings for his confirmation. About the time he was being approved,  Kerry's daughter Vanessa married Behrooz Nahed, an Iranian American neurosurgery resident at Massachusetts General Hospital.  Dr, Nahed was born in New York City to Iranian parents who now live in California, but with many family members who still live in Iran. A matter of some controversy is the appearance of the son of Mohamed Jakad Zarih, the current Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs with whom Kerry negotiated the treaty (called an agreement by the Obama administration) with Iran.  Kerry was no stranger to Zahir as they met in NYC at a party thrown by none other than financial anarchist George Soros when Zahir was the Iranian Ambassador to the UN. It was claimed that Zahir's son, a friend of Nahed was his best man, but this has been denied though a wedding party photo has surfaced that included him.  Kerry should have not been involved in negotiating a nuclear deal with Iran and his Iranian friendships may indicate why the deal, with Obama's approval, was so bad for America.
      On the other hand,Tillerson was a tough negotiator for his company and stock holders when dealing with Russia and other countries with whom US relations may not be on the best of terms.  He has received very positive endorsements from both previous Secretary of State Condolezza Rice and previous Secretary of Defense under both Bush and Obama, Robert Gates.  He knows the world and many world leaders.  If the Democrats were so worried about cozying up to Russia they didn't do or say anything when Obama was caught on a live mike talking to Russian President Dimitri Medvedev that he will have "more flexibility to negotiate after the November elections."
      There is also some negative comments about Donald Trump utilizing his daughter Ivanka as the White House hostess. As we have seen she is attractive, smart, and, like her father, will work for free, a far cry from Michelle Obama who spent $85 million of our money on elaborate vacations. She will not be taking vacations at taxpayer expense.  Democrats should keep their mouths shut over this selection.  She will be a gracious hostess and I don't think the Trumps will leave the Israeli President Netanyahu waiting while they finish dinner.
     Trump seems to be assembling a cabinet of superstars who have been successful in the real world.  He has behaved like the CEO of a huge corporation,  assembling an executive  staff of intelligent successful people who can do the job, not a bunch of academics and  professional politicians.  We saw how a man, with little life experience except as a community organizer and two bit politician, could destroy a nation and an economy.  There are only a few spots left, but the most important nomination to come is to fill the empty Supreme Court seat.
      The Democrats and mainstream media would have gone crazy, if Trump had lost and requested recounts in the states he lost and they belittled him for saying he would contest the results if there were instances of voter fraud.  Miscounts were not the reason for Hillary Clinton's loss. In the previous blog I showed that the Democrats were attacking the messenger and if they had not performed unethically and criminally, the hacks by whoever and exposure by Wikileaks would have been meaningless.

      Thanks again for your support and I know we are looking forward to January 20, 2017 with eager anticipation.

Blaming the Messenger

      Unwilling to admit defeat based on a flawed candidate, the Democrats have blamed Vlad Putin and Russia for hacking Democrat Party officials and Clinton campaign chief John Podesta to sway the election in Donald Trump's favor.  Its always easier to blame the messenger, rather than the message. There has been virtually no comment that the hacks released in large batches by Wikileaks are not true.  The information gleaned from the Pedestal, DNC, and Donna Brazile emails was important and the America voting public had the right know the truth.  The Obama controlled CIA and FBI are at odds with one another as to whether these hacks, if by the Russians, were meant to sway voters to vita for Donald Trump.

      Shortly before the DNC convention, we learned that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Chair of the DNC, clearly favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.  She called Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver an "asshole and liar" and discussed whether her misguided opinion that Sanders' religious belief of atheism (he claimed he was not an atheist) could be used against him, especially in the evangelical South, since his Jewish birth apparently was not effecting Democrat primary voters.  When these emails were posted, she was forced to "resign" just before the Democrat Convention.  Ironically, as we shall see, Donna Brazile was appointed to take her place.  A few months after the convention, Wikileaks exposed that as a CNN pundit, Bazile supplied at least one question to the Clinton team prior to the town hall style debate during the primaries.  It showed that the information she supplied was nearly word for word with the actual question on the death penalty. Brazile subsequently lost her job at CNN. The media giant denied that they had given out this information, as they were hosting the event.  So not only did an employee of CNN  offer a debate question, but the Clinton campaign accepted the offer.  Sanders had complained about a rigged system and these emails certainly confirmed it.

      Podesta's emails shed light on what a poor campaigner Clinton's team thought she was.  One of the talking points in her paid speeches was how out of touch she was with middle America and was why they were never to be released.  Another email thread, that began in 2011, when Pedesta was head of the infamous George Soros funded Center for America Progress (CAP),  was sent by John Halprin, fellow at CPA, to Podesta and Jennifer Palmiere, Hillary for America communications director.  The emails were critical of conservative Catholics in general and in particular media mogul  Rupert Murdock and Wall Street Journal managing editor Robert Thompson who were raising their children as Catholics. Another topic was also a discussion of whether Clinton should use Goldman Sachs in NYC as the venue for a meeting with the biggest donors to the Clinton Foundation.  Another thread discussed how to handle the reaction to the book Clinton Cash by Peter Schwitzer. The consensus was to emphasizing the good works of the Foundation and then use denials based on a series of fact checks by biased fact checkerss.

 

      Some of the most damning information did not come from the emails.  Instead it came from James O'Keefe's Project Veritas that taped Clinton operatives discussing starting violence at Trump rallies.  The two main characters involved in this were Scoot Foval and Robert Creamer.  Foval was field director for Americans United for Change, a George Soros funded group working for the Clinton campaign and Creamer worked for Democracy Partners, another group working for Hillary Clinton's campaign.  In the first video tape, they discussed hiring the mentally ill to incite violence at Trump  rallies.  When this information was made public,  there was obviously a public outcry and interestingly, when Clinton, during a debate brought up violence at Trump rallies, Trump fired back the she had paid for it. A second video tape showed both Creamer and Foval discussing voter fraud using illegal Hispanics as voters on a large and multistate scale.  A third party, Cesar Vargas, an illegal himself, also appeared on the tape.  Both Foval and Creamer were fired as a result.  There was some denial that the tapes were heavily edited, but even if that was the case, the intent was obvious.

      The old tired trick of blaming the messenger won't work, despite Democrat and the Obama regime's effort to say the Russians were trying to effect election results. Certainly Russian hacking ought to be investigated, but so should paying people to riot and commit violence to prevent others from exercising their First Amendment rights.  Don't count on in from the seriously corrupt Obama DOJ.  The Democrats have tried to obfuscate the real issue.  Very simply, if the Democrats and their operatives did not do and say what they did, there would not have been anything worth hacking or video taping.  In reality, the Democrats had a deeply flawed candidate and a terrible strategy.  Hillary Clinton had no positive message.  Her campaign slogan "stronger together" meant nothing to most people.  Her other slogan "I'm with her" would have been much more effective as "she's with us." Her history of lying and the multiple scandals that surrounded her adult life certainly didn't help.  Nor did her calling half of the American population "deplorables."  Both she and those running her campaign thought that the huge amount of money they had raised would be enough to buy the election.  Finally she had an obnoxious personality and phony demeanor that made it nearly impossible for her to connect with most thoughtful people.  The time may have be right for a woman to become POTUS, but Hillary Rodham Clinton was not that woman.