Friday, July 31, 2015

Obama Holds the Key to Hillary Clinton's Future

      Last week Obama made a comment stating that he couldn't run for a third term. but that if he could, he would surely be reelected. Whether you agree with that statement or not (I don't), it indicates to me that Obama is not ready to give up the office.  There are 4 ways that a third term could happen.  The first is the elimination of the 22nd amendment to the constitution.  That is not going to happen, certainly there would not be much time or interest in doing this.  The second is Obama declaring marshall law.  This is not so far fetched.  Obama has quietly built a governmental  unit within the Department of Homeland Security that is trained and heavily armed and could step in to combat large scale civil violence.  His benefactor, George Soros, through organizations that have arisen out of the ashes of ACORN, has funded professional violent demonstrators as those seen in Ferguson, Missouri and Baltimore, to test the waters.  An event, probably orchestrated, could serve as the opening,  By declaring marshall law, Obama could trigger his own October surprise just before the 2016 election, canceling or delaying elections indefinitely and disbanding Congress and the Supreme Court.  Whether this could happen is very remote, but a community organizer with little knowledge and no experience becoming POTUS would have seemed remote 8 years ago.
      A third option would be for Obama, claiming to respond to the seriousness of the allegations against Hillary Clinton,  to allow an FBI investigation and  appointing a special prosecutor, to examine all of the crimes related to Hillary Clinton's e-mail.  Although I think the likelihood of a special prosecutor is very small, as Obama has been unwilling to do so despite numerous scandals involving criminal activity.  He does not want to relinquish control and so prosecution would remain within the totally corrupt Justice Department (Injustice, if you prefer). Still in order to prevent anything from spilling over to him, he could offer Clinton a deal that would amount to the same thing that Petraus received in return for her keeping her mouth shut and dropping out of the race.
      Who is left.  The rest of the current slate of Democratic candidates is very weak. Though Bernie Sanders has gained some traction, like Donald Trump on the Republican side, he has a limited number of followers that would not be enough to make him competitive in the election.  Lincoln Chaffee has been silent, since throwing his hat in the ring, as its hard to raise money based on changing America over to the metric system.  Martin O'Malley has shown himself to be weak in bowing to the Soros funded far left group Black Lives Matter.  America is looking for real leadership after 8 years of no leadership from Obama.  Jim Webb, a marine veteran and more along the line of a 60s or 70s tradition Democrat, has also been quiet and has had difficult fund raising.
      All this says to me is that if Hillary drops out, none of those candidates currently available could win and give Obama a third term.  The most obvious choice to get into the race is Vice President Joe, the Joker, Biden.  He certainly could be easily sold to Obam's far left base as a continuation of the regime, thus a "third term." With Obama supporting him, most far left contributors like George Soros, would be more than happy to contribute(though illegally in the case of Soros).  But is there an even better choice for Obama and his base?  Yes there is and that is my dark horse candidate Michelle Obama.  Obama may think he could do what the Clintons have not done to date.  Emphasizing that his plan to fundamentally change America is not yet complete and that electing Michelle would allow the job (and America) to be finished.

     Note: I said that Obama has not shown any leadership in the world, but there is one recent exception, the negotiations with Iran,  Though France Germany, England, Russia, and China were involved none with the exception of Obama wanted Iran to have access to nuclear weapons.  All wanted to trade with Iran and lifting the embargo and giving Iran one hundred billion dollars would grease their cooperation.  His jaded and treasonous legacy is more important to him than the safety of America and the world.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Fun With the Far Left

      I have a few friends on Facebook who like to share posts from left, liberal, or Democrat Party sites.  Mostly these posts praise Obama, worshiping him and all he has done since becoming president.  There is virtually no real factual information, only repetition of misinformation spewed from the regime.  I thought it would be fun to comment on some of these postings to see what the response would be.  I also felt I could  use my comments as a teaching moment.  The response has been interesting and even amusing.
     First, I was surprised at how many conservatives look at these sites.  I was amazed that I would often have between 200 and 300 'likes" for each comment.  In addition there were usually many more positive comments about the information I provided than negative ones.  The negative comments were unable to refute the facts that I presented, so that most of the negative comments were personal attacks, calling me a hater or racists.  One of my comments called Obamacare a tragedy for America, and a response was that the only tragedy was that I was born.  We know who really are the haters.
      Someone said that there is no teaching, only learning and in that regard the Left was unwilling to learn, basically falling in line with the Obama regime and the mainstream media that supports him.  It is obvious that none of them has ever done any independent research into Obama and his background.  It was the poet Wordsworth who said, "the child is father of the man."  Obama's mentor as an adolescent was communist Frank Marshall Davis and the reason why Obama went to Chicago as a community organizer.  Few have ever heard of Alice Palmer, another communist.  Obama became her campaign manager when she ran for the US House of Representatives in a special election to replace Mel Reynolds who went to prison for having sex with an under age campaign worker.  Even the most deaf, dumb, and blind leftist has heard of Bill Ayers. Despite Obama calling him "just a guy in the neighborhood,'"  evidence shows that the two shared numerous organizational memberships and Obama was Ayers' choice to head the failed Chicago Annenberg Challenge, that funneled most of its funding to Bill Ayers controlled organizations.  It was at Ayers house where Obama declared his intent to run for the Illinois state senate.
      The tactic of personal attacks mimics the technique that the Obama regime has used to silence or try to discredit its critics, right out of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.  This, sadly,  is the only thing the left has learned.

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Obama's Chamberlain Moment, Peace Sells But Only Obama is Buying

      In 1938 British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain emerged from his flight from Munich, waving a document,  where he had just negotiated a treaty with Hitler.  The Nazis had already annexed Austria, the Saar Basin, and the Sudetenland part of Czechoslovakia, and to prevent war England had signed a treaty with Hitler allowing the annexation of a part of Czechoslovakia, so that Hitler would end his expansion.  The famous quote by Chamberlain was, "I give you peace in our time."  We all know how that worked out, World War II.  Now we have Obama addressing the nation in similar fashion espousing a terrible deal that his he has conceded to the Iranians
      The deal that Obama and John Kerry worked out with Iran could make Chamberlain's look rather tame in the face of a potentially nuclear Middle East.  Pakistan is selling ready made nuclear weapons and now Saudi Arabia and Egypt may be buying.  With all the instability in the Middle East, it is not unreasonable to be concerned that terrorists may get a hold of one of these. They rightly don't trust Iran and are interested in protecting themselves. I don't understand why Obama trusts Iran (and Cuba) but doesn't trust an ally Israel.
      The deal is only good for 10 years and Iran can keep its centrifuges and continue to treat uranium for "research purposes," as if there are other uses for weapon's grade uranium.  Spot inspections are not part of the deal, in fact, the IAEC has to give 15 days notice for an inspection.  Finally there has been no mention of Iran's delivery system, so ICBMs can still and will be developed. In ten or eleven years Iran could target New York or Washington DC.
      With the removal of economic sanctions billions of dollars will be released to Iran, the leading sponsor of state sponsored terror.  Hamas and Hezbollah will get more assistance so that they can increase their terrorist activities.
     Congress must overwhelmingly turn down this terrible deal.  Sadly, but typically Obamaesque, it is not called a treaty, because Congress could easily turn it down.  Instead Congress needs a filibuster proof vote to override Obama's veto.
     Like Clinton, Obama has been continually looking for a legacy.  His hope and desire is to destroy America, and this deal will add to that. He wants to go down as the worst president in history and this deal assures that title.