What Should Be the Republican Strategy for 2106

      Having lost both the presidential elections of 2008 and 2012 to a communist community organizer with no significant accomplishments and with a political philosophy determined to degrade and destroy America, the Republicans have to consider a change in strategy.  In my opinion, the fear of being labeled racists, toned down their criticism. McClain muzzled the perfect attack dog, Sarah Pallin, due to this fear.  They have to realize that they will get no help from the mainstream media who will continue to not do their job in reporting negative stories about the opposition.  The LA Times even refused to release a videos showing Obama addressing a party for two of his best friends, Rashid Khalidi and Edward Said because it contained anti Israel overtones that may have hurt his campaign and fund raising with Jews.  The media supported the idea that anyone critical of Obama's policies were racist.  Now Hillary Clinton has thrown down a similar gauntlet, namely the war on women.  Even the potential first ladies were treated differently.  Michelle Obama was praised because of her wonderful fashion sense and will toned arms.  In fact her fashion sense is terrible and she would have made Mr. Blackwell's list.  Her butt and hips are gigantic and at best she has an awkward figure. Anne Romney was criticized for spending $1000 on a blouse that she could afford.  McClain's wife was also criticized until it was learned about her charitable activities that bested anything Michelle Obama has and will ever undertake.
      Now Hillary Clinton has begun using "the war on women to attack Republicans.  She is another candidate with virtually no accomplishments other than having been married to Bill Clinton.  She was arguably the worst Secretary of State and makes Madeline Albright seem respectable. Republicans need to minimize campaigning on social issue as its s big looser as any candidate's views will always be distorted by the media. When asked a question about abortion or gay marriage, a candidate should reply, "my opinion really doesn't matter.  As President I am sworn to defend the Constitution, unlike the current regime, and the Supreme Court has already ruled on these issues."  In comparing spouses, the media will support Bill as being a wonderful advisor on all of the issue and consider any other wife as "just a mother" with no experience.  The media should be reminded of Bill's history of infidelity including his recent visits to convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein private island for sex with underage women.  This story has been covered up by the media.  In addition, Bill's speaking fees and the Clinton Family Foundation are open for discussion of conflict of interest.  This would certainly continue if Hillary was selected as the Democrat nominee. Heck, Bill would probably want to have sex with Trump's wife rather than debate her.
      The Democrats will want to stress that the Republicans are getting money from millionaires and billionaires, when in fact they are doing the same.  In addition the Republicans ought to stress the millions in union support and the millions of illegal foreign money the Democrats receive.  Bill Clinton got $20 million from the Red Chinese Army for allowing his friend and campaign bundler Bernie Schwartz to sell them missile guidance technology despite the advice of the CIA, State Department, and Defense Department not to do so.  Obama got over 36,000 contributions on the internet that were in odd amounts. When converted back to their original currencies these amounts were more logical and corresponded to even amounts in various currencies of Midwestern countries.
     Finally the Republicans have a great chance in 2016 because of the failed Obama Presidency.  They need to emphasize all of the Obama failures and not spend so much time criticizing each other.  It is not a good idea to fight among each other even though the media wants to spur this on.  Just say so and so is entitled to his opinion and leave it at that.

Refugees and Stupid Politicians

      Donald Trump is right, politicians are stupid and that just doesn't go for our politicians, but European politicians as well.  With hundreds of thousands of refugees streaming out of Syria, Iraq, and the Middle East, Europe is overwhelmed and doesn't know what to do. The answer that these stupid politicians have overlooked is to eliminate the reason why they are leaving in the first place.
Very simply is to destroy ISIS and Bashir Assad.  The former would be relatively easy, but the later has just become much more difficult.
      Imagine a NATO or European Army of 250,000 fighting ISIS which is though to number about 50,000.  This army would have control of the skies and would have more and better technology.Seizing the Iraqi oil fields and ISIS headquarters in Syria would be easy. Any leaders that are captured would be subject to an international court with the death penalty as the sentence.
      Once ISIS is eliminated, Assad has to go.  He has killed 250,000 of his own people, and if it weren't for IRAN and Russia he would be gone already.  Because the USA and Europe has dallied for so long, the Russians have stepped in to fill the void, bring in more sophisticated weapons systems, that would make things more difficult.  Still Russia could be persuaded to back off.  This would be easy to do, if Obama would change his energy policy.  We could use our oil and gas to sell to Europe. Russia relies on sales of these products to Europe, especially Germany for hard currency.  Shipping LNG and oil to Europe at a better price than Russia would really put pressure on Putin not only in Syria, but all over the world.
      Sadly, we have leaders who just don't understand what is going on in the world.  Our own president has made a horrible deal with Iran a country that continues to tell us that it wants to destroy us.  Only a real idiot would make a deal under those circumstances.  It also doesn't help to deny the existence of radical Islam.