Sunday, June 28, 2015

Are SCOTUS Justices Actually Congressmen?

      This week the SCOTUS made two decisions, one predictable the other not, but both very disappointing and the later destructive and dangerous for our country.  Not being an attorney, I can only base my interpretation of these decisions on common sense and what I know about the Constitution and how it has been interpreted by previous courts.
      I do not necessarily disagree that gays and lesbian can marry.  I do disagree that this even came before  SCOTUS.  Like the decision on abortion in the '70s,  this is a state supreme court issue and not one for SCOTUS.  This was predictable as SCOTUS has continued to trample states' rights.  There is nothing in the Constitution about abortion and marriage and therefore according to the Constitution, this is left to the states to decide. If a state supreme court thinks the voters were wrong denying the joys (and pains) of marriage to gays and lesbians, then it should rule so.  In my opinion, an amendment  to the US Constitution is necessary for it to become the law of the land as it would then become part of the US Constitution.  Unfortunately, SCOTUS has continued to erode states' rights writing laws as opposed to what they should be doing. According to Article III of the Constitution, the justices are to interpret legal matters and not make them.  What SCOTUS should have ruled, is that if a state chooses not to issue licenses for gay marriage, it none the less has to recognize the rights of gay couples bestowed on them by those performed in other states as some of those rights involved property, taxes and inheritances.  Finally, SCOTUS should have added to the decision, that although gay marriage is according to ScOTUS the law of the land,  ministers, priests, rabbis, and even imams and their churches, synagogues and mosques do not have to perform the ceremonies on religious grounds, if they choose not to.  Private individuals may also choose to not provide services on religious grounds.
      The decision on Obamacare is the most disturbing, and I question the ability and intelligence of five of the justices to read and comprehend simple language. The law specifically said one thing and now SCOTUS says it says another just as they did with the original decision on Obamacare.  When the law states that government subsidies can only be granted to states that set of insurance exchanges, how can it mean that subsidies can be given whether a state does so or not. The main architect of this disaster, Jonathan Gruber, has said that the American people are stupid and now he can extend that statement to five SCOTUS justices.  Obamacare is a law that was sold to the American public based on outright lies and deception and for those of you who have followed my blog, you know that this law has very little to do with healthcare and much much more about collapsing the American economy as was Obama's goal from the onset.  The financing of Obamacare is unsustainable and has dire consequences for our country.
      The job of SCOTUS is to interpret the Constitution  and resolve conflicts.  It is not to make laws.  If the justices of SCOTUS want to create legislation, then they should resign and run for Congress.
     

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Is Obama Delusional or Just a Liar and What About Hillary.?

      Obama has made some statements recently that seem so far fetched, that many people have thought that he is delusional.  Specifically, he said he was the closest thing to a Jewish president and that we are making progress against ISIS.
      He is not delusional or lying when he talks about being a Jew, as the two Jews he knows best are Saul Alinsky and George Soros, both Jews in name only (JINOs).  Alinsky believed in lying as stated in his Rules for Radicals as a means to further the revolution and maintain power.  Obama has taken him at his word and certainly we have seen him lie about just about everything in order to get his way.  Obamacare would never have passed, if it weren't for lying.  And despite his claimed outrage about the numerous scandals that have plagued his administration, he has done nothing about them.  No one has been fired or gone to prison.  Some have even been promoted and given bonuses or raises in order to buy their silence during whatever congressional investigation was undertaken.  The FBI and Justice Department ignored these law breakers as they were forced to stand down.  Soros who has funded Obama's attack groups is anti American and a convicted felon.  During WWII he turned in other Jews to the Hungarian Gestapo in order to save his own skin.  He funds J Street that wants to give Israel to the Palestinians. J Street is supported by Obama and DNC head Debby Wasserman Schultz. Obama has paid him back for his support as he triers to collapse the American economy a la Cloward and Piven.  Getting global warming legislation passed or with regulations, may be that last straw.  As we all know global warming is a total hoax. Those are the Jews that Obama is most alike.  If you are looking for a Jewish president, try LBJ who as a Senator helped ship weapons out of Galveston to Israel in 1948 as it fought for its very existence.  He also was the first president to give Israel offensive weapons, something Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy never did.  Or how about Nixon who demanded that we urgently resupply Israel during the Yom Kippur War.  George Bush also supported Israel by refusing to negotiate with the Palestinians until they recognized Israel's right to exist.  They never have.
      Obama is fully aware that ISIS is methodically taking over Syria and Iraq. He has to lie about his anemic attempt to stem the tide of Jihad for he is unwilling to admit that he made a serious mistake in under estimating ISIS and pulling our troops out of Iraq.  A few bombing sortees, where often bombs aren't even dropped, is not the way to defeat ISIS.  He'll leave that to the next president.  Democratic presidents have been very good at letting the enemy know what the limits are, breaking rule number one of military strategy. Bill Clinton did the same thing in Kosovo and got away with it.  Whether or not he planned to send US troops in to Kosovo, he should not have given out that info to the Serbs. Instead he should have sent the 10th Army Division, a mountain division, to Italy to practice war games and training with its counterpart in the Italian Army.  The Serbs would have seen that as a treat of deployment and capitulated earlier.
      Obama is certainly not delusional.  He knows exactly what he is doing.  When his anti American efforts get discovered or go awry, he has no qualms about lying.  He uses lies to achieve and maintain  political dominance.  Only recently have some in the media realize that they refused to fully vet him when he was first running for office,  totally ignoring his communist, socialist, anti American, and Muslim ties and his lack of experience.  He will go down in history as the worst president in the history of America.
      Hillary is also another politician who uses lying to further her own ends.  She is pathologic.  She even lied about her name, saying that she was named after Sir Edmond Hillary, the famous conquerer of Mt. Everest.  Problem is, he climbed Everest five years after she was born. To believe, you would have to believe that she went as Girl Rodham for five years. She also lied about hearing MLK speak in Atlanta when she was a girl.  Finally she lied 110 times to Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr by answering "I don't remember."  Sutter Libby said that once to Prosecutor Christopher and went to prison.  If Starr had any balls he would have sent Hillary to prison on 110 counts of perjury and we wouldn't have to worry that this nefarious and incompetent person might become president.