The mainstream media feigned shock when FBI director James Comes was fired this week. Many of us who follow politics closely thought he should have been last July when he recommended not charging HRC with espionage and other crimes related to security even though she set up an unsecured private server to bypass transparency within the State Department and then erasing over 30,000 emails she claimed were personal. Unfortunately we all know that those were the most damaging. This was certainly reminiscent of the 18 minute gap in the Nixon tapes 45 years ago. We all know that the Clintons are very good at making things disappear like the White Water billing records, the White House Travel Office ledger and most importantly the log of who checked out the FBI files on 1000 prominent Republicans. At his July press conference, Comet laid out the case against Hillary Clinton carefully and methodically listing one crime after another and the various laws she had broken and lies she had told to the FBI and the public. Then, amazingly, he said he didn't recommend indictment, as if that is his job. Violation of national security doesn't include intent, especially when the intent was obviously purposeful. Justt ask the sailor who took a few pictures on board one of our submarines so he could show his children where he served and he got prison time. The job of the Justice Department attorneys and Attorney General is to bring an indictment or at least call a grand jury. AG Loretta Lynch, after being found to have met secretly with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac in Phoenix, Arizona a few days before did not recuse herself, but wrongly seemed to delegated her duty to the FBI director rather than one of her attorneys. Comey should have set her straight, but by then we knew the fix was in. Where was the call for an independent prosecutor then, as if Obama would ever appoint one. His regime was so political that every scandal would have led back to Valerie Jarrett and him, if a special council had been appointed.
Like the hypocrites that they are Chuckie Schumer and the Democrats are likening this to Nixon's firing of special prosecutor Archibald Cox and also calling for a special prosecutor. Only a few months ago they were calling for replacing Comey and claimed he cost HRC the presidential election. A large amount of evidence had been uncovered by Cox at the time and even his firing, as Nixon found out, wasn't going to make it go away. In fact not a smidgen of evidence has surfaced that the Trump campaign and presidency has ever colluded with the Russians. Bill Clinton fired the Attorney General the day before Vince Foster committed suicide. (Was Foster afraid he would have to compromise himself to protect the Clintons.) The Democrats only goals is to delegitimize the President and try and drag this out to the 2018 midterms to continue to push this stupid issue. Any investigation is still on going, any evidence if there is any isn't going away so the Democrat concern is all for show with no substance. Where was their outrage when Obama fired 90 attorneys that were appointed by Bush?
Why did this happen now? The Democrats have only themselves to blame for taking so long to confirm Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein when he was nominated to replace the acting Attorney General Sally Yates as deputy Attorney General. Attorney General Sessions has recused himself from the Russian investigation. Rosenstein is the only Bush appointee to the Justice Department that was not fired by Obama and he served all eight years of Obama's regime. He was approved by 94 senators. After reviewing Comey's job as director, he recommended firing him, because of problems with the Clinton investigation. Present Trump accepted the Justice Department recommendation.
The collusion issue should end quickly and not drag on forever. There is no evidence backing this and the FBI and Justice should say so. Whether the Russians tried to influence the election is another matter, and if they are behind Wikileaks so be it. Wikileaks is merely a messenger. If there was no message in Democrat campaign officials' emails there would be no Wikileaks involvement. General Michael Flynn's name was not leaked by Wikileaks to the Washington Post after it was unveiled by Susan Rice. The FBI must carry out an investigation as to who was the leaker and have that person arrested and tried even if the investigation leads to Obama and/or Valerie Jarrett.
Thursday, May 11, 2017
Wednesday, May 10, 2017
Clapper and Yates Say Nothing and Obama Appointed Justice Continue to Ignore the Constitution
Today I listened to hours of two hearings going on at the same time. The first was the senate congressional hearing on Russian interference with our 2016 presidential election. So far there hasn't been any information linking President Trump or his team affecting the election results. The Russians may have tried, but most of what we have learned involving the winning team took place after the election and it may have been nothing at all. As it turned out General Michael Flynn, an early supporter and security advisor to President Trump during the campaign and appointed head of NSA afterword until he was fired as it turned out he was unmasked as having several conversations with the Russian Ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak. We have not been privy to what was said, but many people in Washington, DC have had contact with Ambassador Kislyak including
senators and congressman all the time. It also turns out that he had contact after leaving the military as a private consultant receiving money from both Russian and Turkish governments. According to Flynn's attorney he advised the Pentagon and this was approved, but the documents don't exist or have been disappeared, not uncommon during the Obama regime. I believe the later as part of a plot to discredit President Trump as this would have assuredly come up when Flynn was renewing his highest level security clearance. The Obama regime granted it, even though they knew about his Russian and Turkish contacts. They were setting President Trump up no doubt.
The real story is this. If the Russians or someone under their guidance hacked HRC and the DNC, the story would have ended there, if everything they found was legal and ethical. The FBI even warned the DNC about hacking and they refused FBI help, probably worried about what the FBI would find on their servers. Most of the documents released by Wikileaks occurred after the FBI offer. The DNC is blaming the messenger rather than their illegal and unethical message as effecting the election. If these hacks did effect the election results, the Democrats and Hillary Clinton should blame DWS, Donna Brazile, John Podesta, and herself. HRC has a long history of sub rosa activity and this is no different. If anyone would be prone to blackmail, it would be Hillary Clinton herself. While she was Secretary of State she approved the sale of 20% of US Uranium to the Russians. At the same time, the Russian oligarchs, who purchased the company, made a $145 million donation to a shell Canadian charity that laundered the money and then passed it on to the Clinton Foundation. If there is something that could be used for blackmail, this would certainly be it. No one seemed to mention it. All the Democrats wanted to talk about was Flynn being blackmailed, nothing about Clinton. They said Flynn lied to the FBI and should be indicted, but what about HRC, she lied to the FBI and committed at least a dozen other crimes related to national security. How about an independent investigator for her. You know why. Obama would never allow it as it might just get back to him. The "fast and furious," Benghazi, Bo Bergdahl, secret cash to Iran, and other Obama lies deserve an independent council, but wouldn't happen.
What did we learn? No evidence was presented by General Clapper or Obama hack, former deputy AG Sally Yates, that Russia colluded with President Trump's campaign. Yates and Clapper gave an answer fell back on national security and so they couldn't say. Yates tried at times to give an answer that contained innuendo, but when questioned fell back on national security. One of the most interesting moments came when Senator Ted Cruz questioned her about the executive order banning some immigrants and refugees from six Mideast and African countries. He reminded her that in the history of her office, she is the first and only AG who refused to back the President. If she opposed the order she should have resigned instead of behaving like the political hack that she is. Neither claimed to know anything about unmasking or leaking.
The second soap opera I was following was the hearing on the President's executive order banning immigrants and muslims from certain countries. The US attorney sited American Constitutional Law and a history of bans by other presidents in the name of national security. Some of the judges tried to fall back on the Presidents campaign statements rather than law. As might be expected 10 of the 13 judges hearing the case were appointed by Obama or Clinton, so the fix is in unless they want to abide by the Constitution and previous related decisions. The most esteemed judge, J. Harvie Wilkerson III, a Reagan appointee, is a conservative, but has recused himself as his son is a clerk for the Solicitor General Jeffery Wall. Obama, Carter and Bush banned travel to the US from Muslim countries. Of course, George Soros is financing his anti America open borders policy so expect this one to wind up at the Supreme Court.
senators and congressman all the time. It also turns out that he had contact after leaving the military as a private consultant receiving money from both Russian and Turkish governments. According to Flynn's attorney he advised the Pentagon and this was approved, but the documents don't exist or have been disappeared, not uncommon during the Obama regime. I believe the later as part of a plot to discredit President Trump as this would have assuredly come up when Flynn was renewing his highest level security clearance. The Obama regime granted it, even though they knew about his Russian and Turkish contacts. They were setting President Trump up no doubt.
The second soap opera I was following was the hearing on the President's executive order banning immigrants and muslims from certain countries. The US attorney sited American Constitutional Law and a history of bans by other presidents in the name of national security. Some of the judges tried to fall back on the Presidents campaign statements rather than law. As might be expected 10 of the 13 judges hearing the case were appointed by Obama or Clinton, so the fix is in unless they want to abide by the Constitution and previous related decisions. The most esteemed judge, J. Harvie Wilkerson III, a Reagan appointee, is a conservative, but has recused himself as his son is a clerk for the Solicitor General Jeffery Wall. Obama, Carter and Bush banned travel to the US from Muslim countries. Of course, George Soros is financing his anti America open borders policy so expect this one to wind up at the Supreme Court.
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
The Sting in Which the Stinger May get Stung: Obama's Plot to Destroy Trump
Hold on to your drinks my loyal followers for you are about to read something that you will not find anywhere else, at least not for a while. What you will learn here is what is going to bring down Obama and/or his closest and most loyal advisors who themselves concocted this nefarious scheme to bring down and destroy the administration of President Trump. President Trump is dismantling the Obama legacy, that Democrat Presidents so badly want, and Obama and the Democrats want to stop him.
This narrative began in 2015, well after Donald Trump announced his run for the presidency. Obama's closest advisors recognized that Mr. Trump was a serious candidate, especially when he began to draw a following. Mr. Trump was different from all of the other candidates, even Obama, who was the first and only president who wanted to destroy America and its economy rather than support it. Mr. Trump claimed to be wealthy enough to finance his own campaign and thus was beholden to no one's political whims. In addition he was outspoken and said or tweeted what he thought and drew record crowds where ever he spoke. This willingness to say precisely what was on his mind, attracted a following that grew until it was large enough to win him the Republican nomination for POTUS. Previous Republican candidate, John McCain and George Romney, both seemed like winners and great candidates, but neither had the willingness to attack by telling the truth about Obama or at least use surrogates to enlighten the public on what a monster Obama really is.
Candidate Trump tirelessly attack Obama and his programs so Obama knew what he had to do. Obama had access to information that may have been illegally obtained that even the Clinton dirty tricks machine didn't and even though he hated Trump, there was no love lost between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Sharing this information during the campaign was probably not necessary and so it would only be used in the unlikelihood that Donald Trump won the election. Every story either planted in the media by the Clinton campaign or by the media itself seemed to bounce off candidate Trump like water off a duck and although there might have been a brief statistical drop in his support, it never lasted very long. The bevy of lies that asserted that Mr. Trump was a racist, misogynist, xenophobe, and tax cheat were never really believed by anyone, but far left haters as the people pushing this garbage were themselves liars, especially when they were exposed by Wikileaks and other sources. In fact, it was well recognized that HRC was untrustworthy and a liar with a disingenuous personality and entitlement attitude that made her a poor candidate. She had no real message except Trump is evil, vote for me, I'm a woman. She ignored the Midwest (she flew over fly over country) and was frequently running off to Hollywood and New York for fund raisers, solidifying the center of the country for Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, when the inevitable disaster for the Democrat Party occurred, Obama was ready. With the aid of his highly political members of the NSC, namely Susan Rice and her assistant Ben Rhodes, Obama and Valerie Jarrett had been collecting bits of highly sensitive information on members of the President Trump's team and people he would most likely appoint to cabinet level positions. This was done via a process of "unmasking, "in which Americans who are caught up in surveillance of non American have their names unveiled as a matter of national security. This is rarely necessary. Susan Rice at first denied, but later admitted to being the unmasker. Although she wanted to replace HRC as Secretary of State. it was obvious that she could not get Senate approval, so she was appointed to a position that did not require senate approval as NSA advisor. Her assistant was Ben Rhodes a speech writer and close advisor to Obama. His brother is president of CBS, a good place to leak information. He also bragged about obfuscating the truth about the terrible Iran deal and spent months secretly meeting in Canada to open relations with communist Cuba. Obama had totally politicized positions that were supposed to be apolitical. Rice had taken huge amounts of criticism when she knowingly lied on six Sunday morning news interviews about Benghazi. Further more she lied about Bo Bergdahl, saying the deserter served with honor. Was she now lying about the leaks?
The target was retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn. Flynn had spent his entire 33 year military career in intelligence and "retired" one year early in 2014 having been forced out by Obama with whom he clashed over the threat of radical Islam and approach to Syria. After retiring, Flynn began a consulting firm with his son and had accepted money from both Russia and from Turkey through a Dutch intermediary. His attorney has said that both of these activities were approved by our government, although the records don't seem to exist or maybe just disappeared.
Now comes the good part. Despite knowing of Flynn's activity with Russia and Turkey, which would have affected his security clearance, nonetheless it was reissued at the highest level in 2016. There are only two explanations for this, either the Obama regime was very sloppy, unlikely, or they planned to use it later after he was approved for his position if Donald Trump was elected. Either Susan Rice or Ben Rhodes leaked his Russian contacts to the Washington Post. The unmasking by Susan Rice of General Flynn was probably a crime, but hard to prove. The leak is a crime and needs to be followed up and one or the other needs to be arrested, tried, and if found guilty go to prison. Rice or Rhodes would never have done this on their own so the orders came from higher up. That higher up is either/or both Valerie Jarrett and Obama. Will Rice or Rhodes take the blame, as Lois Lerner did in the Tea Party Scandal with prison time now in the offing? It remains to be seen.
This is all part of the false narrative that Russia significantly influenced our presidential election in collusion with President Trump and his election team. So far not one smidgen (to quote Obama) of evidence has emerged that could be called a smoking gun. Meeting, shaking hands, or chatting with t Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak does not mean anything. The Democrats need to admit it, HRC was a horrible candidate and never deserved to be president.
This narrative began in 2015, well after Donald Trump announced his run for the presidency. Obama's closest advisors recognized that Mr. Trump was a serious candidate, especially when he began to draw a following. Mr. Trump was different from all of the other candidates, even Obama, who was the first and only president who wanted to destroy America and its economy rather than support it. Mr. Trump claimed to be wealthy enough to finance his own campaign and thus was beholden to no one's political whims. In addition he was outspoken and said or tweeted what he thought and drew record crowds where ever he spoke. This willingness to say precisely what was on his mind, attracted a following that grew until it was large enough to win him the Republican nomination for POTUS. Previous Republican candidate, John McCain and George Romney, both seemed like winners and great candidates, but neither had the willingness to attack by telling the truth about Obama or at least use surrogates to enlighten the public on what a monster Obama really is.
Candidate Trump tirelessly attack Obama and his programs so Obama knew what he had to do. Obama had access to information that may have been illegally obtained that even the Clinton dirty tricks machine didn't and even though he hated Trump, there was no love lost between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Sharing this information during the campaign was probably not necessary and so it would only be used in the unlikelihood that Donald Trump won the election. Every story either planted in the media by the Clinton campaign or by the media itself seemed to bounce off candidate Trump like water off a duck and although there might have been a brief statistical drop in his support, it never lasted very long. The bevy of lies that asserted that Mr. Trump was a racist, misogynist, xenophobe, and tax cheat were never really believed by anyone, but far left haters as the people pushing this garbage were themselves liars, especially when they were exposed by Wikileaks and other sources. In fact, it was well recognized that HRC was untrustworthy and a liar with a disingenuous personality and entitlement attitude that made her a poor candidate. She had no real message except Trump is evil, vote for me, I'm a woman. She ignored the Midwest (she flew over fly over country) and was frequently running off to Hollywood and New York for fund raisers, solidifying the center of the country for Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, when the inevitable disaster for the Democrat Party occurred, Obama was ready. With the aid of his highly political members of the NSC, namely Susan Rice and her assistant Ben Rhodes, Obama and Valerie Jarrett had been collecting bits of highly sensitive information on members of the President Trump's team and people he would most likely appoint to cabinet level positions. This was done via a process of "unmasking, "in which Americans who are caught up in surveillance of non American have their names unveiled as a matter of national security. This is rarely necessary. Susan Rice at first denied, but later admitted to being the unmasker. Although she wanted to replace HRC as Secretary of State. it was obvious that she could not get Senate approval, so she was appointed to a position that did not require senate approval as NSA advisor. Her assistant was Ben Rhodes a speech writer and close advisor to Obama. His brother is president of CBS, a good place to leak information. He also bragged about obfuscating the truth about the terrible Iran deal and spent months secretly meeting in Canada to open relations with communist Cuba. Obama had totally politicized positions that were supposed to be apolitical. Rice had taken huge amounts of criticism when she knowingly lied on six Sunday morning news interviews about Benghazi. Further more she lied about Bo Bergdahl, saying the deserter served with honor. Was she now lying about the leaks?
The target was retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn. Flynn had spent his entire 33 year military career in intelligence and "retired" one year early in 2014 having been forced out by Obama with whom he clashed over the threat of radical Islam and approach to Syria. After retiring, Flynn began a consulting firm with his son and had accepted money from both Russia and from Turkey through a Dutch intermediary. His attorney has said that both of these activities were approved by our government, although the records don't seem to exist or maybe just disappeared.
Now comes the good part. Despite knowing of Flynn's activity with Russia and Turkey, which would have affected his security clearance, nonetheless it was reissued at the highest level in 2016. There are only two explanations for this, either the Obama regime was very sloppy, unlikely, or they planned to use it later after he was approved for his position if Donald Trump was elected. Either Susan Rice or Ben Rhodes leaked his Russian contacts to the Washington Post. The unmasking by Susan Rice of General Flynn was probably a crime, but hard to prove. The leak is a crime and needs to be followed up and one or the other needs to be arrested, tried, and if found guilty go to prison. Rice or Rhodes would never have done this on their own so the orders came from higher up. That higher up is either/or both Valerie Jarrett and Obama. Will Rice or Rhodes take the blame, as Lois Lerner did in the Tea Party Scandal with prison time now in the offing? It remains to be seen.
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
President Trump's First 100 Days
The mainstream media, as expected, has played down the successes of the first hundred days of President Trump's administration and instead extolled the "success" of the Democrats in thwarting it. The most obvious success from "Make America Great Again" is that it has unleashed a revitalized spirit in many Americans, who feel that they can now get jobs and get their lives back together. With this in mind, President Trump has begun reversing the destructive regulations imposed by Obama. In addition his appointment of Judge Neil Gorsuch has supported our Constitution. Unfortunately his own party legislatively has contributed to the lack of progress. On would think that after eight years of knowing and seeing Obamacare's failure, they would have a new plan in place ready to go. Sadly, like most politicians, concerns about getting reelected have replaced a desire to help the American people.
The other roadblock to making America great again is the liberal judges, most of whom were appointed by Obama or Clinton. These judges, especially those in the far left 9th Circuit are not looking out for the safety of Americans and of course ignoring the Constitution. I think their anti America decisions will eventually be overturned, but that of course is part of the left's plan for delay.
Meanwhile the Democrat Party has become the party of no. They have delayed the approval of many of President Trump's nominees for cabinet positions and other positions that require Senate approval, hindering our country's progress, and of course failed to help dismantle Obama's imploding ACA. Out of stubbornness or ignorance they have failed to understand that Obama's agenda has nearly destroyed the Democrat Party with Republican gains every election cycle since Obama took office, culminating with Donald Trump winning the Presidency. They are more worried about their own reelection, thinking that George Soros and the far left money will back a primary opponent in the next election.
Speaking of the next election cycle, it spells real trouble for Democrats. Thirty three senators are up for reelection and 25 are Democrats, 10 of whom are from states won by President Trump. The Republicans could have a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. Rather then help America and President Trump, they have mistakenly decided to oppose him every step of the way. This may prove foolhardy, relying on a far left base that hares America and is responsible for the weak economy left by Obama. If the few special elections are any indication, Democrats are going to have real trouble winning any seats in the next election.
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosis, Elizabeth "Lieahontus" Warren, Al Franken, and Maxine Waters are out of touch with the American people and have all become caricatures of political demagogues. Sadly all but Franken are from very safe districts or states. Franken first came to the Senate via vote fraud. (Votes were produced after the initial count that elected Norm Coleman that put Franken over the top. It didn't matter that these additional new votes, all of which were for Franken, meant that there were more votes in those precincts than voters.)
Republican have to be vigilant. Democrats want to claim that President Trump and Republican are anti immigrant, trying to confuse the public. President Trump and Republican are pro legal immigrants and anti illegals. Sanctuary Cities violate American law and yet Democrats support them. It hard to believe that they want to support violent criminals, but they do, hoping that illegals can vote and vote for them. The hell with the safety of the American public, who doesn't have armed bodyguards to protect them. The same can be said for unvetted refugees. We have enough problems with our own citizens being radicalized. We certainly don't need anymore that are unwilling to accept our laws and way of life.
The last thing the left is pushing very hard is global warming. Trump is looking at rejecting the destructive Paris Climate Accord that places much of the financial burden on America, rather than China, India, and Russia. Only a president who hates America could ever have accepted such an unbalanced agreement. I'm hoping that one and far all a robust debate will take place, exposing the hoax of global warming (now euphemistically called climate change).
I will continue to keep you appraised as to what is going on in government. My next post is going to expose the plot by Obama to destroy Trump. Stay tuned.
The other roadblock to making America great again is the liberal judges, most of whom were appointed by Obama or Clinton. These judges, especially those in the far left 9th Circuit are not looking out for the safety of Americans and of course ignoring the Constitution. I think their anti America decisions will eventually be overturned, but that of course is part of the left's plan for delay.
Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosis, Elizabeth "Lieahontus" Warren, Al Franken, and Maxine Waters are out of touch with the American people and have all become caricatures of political demagogues. Sadly all but Franken are from very safe districts or states. Franken first came to the Senate via vote fraud. (Votes were produced after the initial count that elected Norm Coleman that put Franken over the top. It didn't matter that these additional new votes, all of which were for Franken, meant that there were more votes in those precincts than voters.)
Republican have to be vigilant. Democrats want to claim that President Trump and Republican are anti immigrant, trying to confuse the public. President Trump and Republican are pro legal immigrants and anti illegals. Sanctuary Cities violate American law and yet Democrats support them. It hard to believe that they want to support violent criminals, but they do, hoping that illegals can vote and vote for them. The hell with the safety of the American public, who doesn't have armed bodyguards to protect them. The same can be said for unvetted refugees. We have enough problems with our own citizens being radicalized. We certainly don't need anymore that are unwilling to accept our laws and way of life.
The last thing the left is pushing very hard is global warming. Trump is looking at rejecting the destructive Paris Climate Accord that places much of the financial burden on America, rather than China, India, and Russia. Only a president who hates America could ever have accepted such an unbalanced agreement. I'm hoping that one and far all a robust debate will take place, exposing the hoax of global warming (now euphemistically called climate change).
I will continue to keep you appraised as to what is going on in government. My next post is going to expose the plot by Obama to destroy Trump. Stay tuned.
Monday, May 1, 2017
More on General Flynn, President Trump's Tax Reform Package, and New Info on the Terrible Iran Deal.
The Democrats don't want to let the appointment and firing of General Michael Flynn go away. As it turns out, he violated a security clearance agreement he signed by accepting money from Russian and Turkish sources without clearing it through the Defense and State Departments first. (Flynn, through his attorney, has said he did have it cleared.) The Democrats are very critical that the Trump if he won the election. administration failed to vet Flynn adequately, especially with a security check. As it turns out, his security clearance was renewed in 2016 by the Obama administration. President Trump's spokesman, Sean Spicer, has said that this recent security clearance was accepted as it often is from one administration to the next. Was Flynn granted his clearance by Obama henchmen despite knowing he failed to report income from foreign sources so that it could be used to attack and embarrass President Trump. This opens a problem for the Democrats as he was cleared first by the Obama regime despite the so called violations. Obama officials obviously failed to do their job. The Flynn investigation has turned into a ridiculous investigation of whether the Russia intentionally helped President Trump win the election, as the Democrats can't accept that Hillary Clinton was a terrible unlikeable candidate, with no real message, and a poorly managed campaign. What has been learned from the investigation has opened a can of worms for the Democrats with serious criminal implications. As it turns out Flynn and other members of President Trump's team have been the subject of potentially illegal surveillance and unveiling of American citizens. Chronic immoral prevaricator Susan Rice a political member of the NSC (a position that did not have to be approved by the Senate) now admits to unveiling many of the Trump team after first denying she knew anything about it. She still denies having leaked his name. If she didn't leak the name, it was certainly her assistant and very political appointee, Ben Rhodes. Both Valerie Jarrett and Obama had to know and approve. It will be interesting if he falls on his sword to protect his bosses. The monetary payoff would have to be significant.
President Trump has offered an amazing tax reform plan. Details are not totally clear yet. but what is known seems great as it will prevent the government from confiscation of the hard earned money from the middle class and will promote and increase jobs. Importantly it will allow corporations to repatriate trillions of dollars, that can be used to expand business, create more jobs, and reward shareholders with buybacks and dividends. Workers will get raises in some instances and so not only with they take home more because of a raise, but also more because taxes will be less. The business tax rate including Subchapter S Corporations at 15% It keeps the mortgage and charitable deductions. Rates would be 10%, 25, and 35%, though the income levels have not be released. Interesting the plan does away with deductions for local and state taxes. Screw you New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and California you should have voted for President Trump. He has doubled the personal deduction and done away with the alternative minimum tax. Stupid Harpy, Nancy Pelosi, has already panned the plan although she hasn't even seen it. Maybe she should vote for it so she could find out what's in it like she said about the abomination known as Obamacare. Her typically Democrat propaganda claims its only for the rich and will increase the debt by $5.5 trillion. That bothers her, but Obama increasing the debt by more than $10 trillion was okay. Chucky Schumer also doesn't like it as well, same propaganda. It would be nice to hear politicians talk about cutting the size and cost of government. The President is trying to make government more efficient as any businessman would about his business.
More bad news for America continues to emerge from the Obama regime's reckless deal with Iran. We already know that it ranks as the absolute worst deal since Neville Chamberlain"s ill fated deal with Hitler. for "peace in our time," that brought about WW2. Beside the seven Iranian prisoners released that we knew about (they were serving time for espionage and illegal procurement crimes, fourteen international, interpol "red" warrants were dropped for individuals who were under indictment for similar crimes. One of those released by Obama was an Iranian who designed IEDs of the type used in Iraq that had killed American soldiers. As pointed out in a previous blog, John Kerry did not reveal or recuse himself from these negotiations with his Iranian counterpart with who he had a personal relationship through his daughter's wedding. Of course no one in the Obama administration has ever recused themselves including Loretta Lynch who secretly met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at an Arizona airport a few days before the FBI was to announce its findings in its investigation of Hillary Clinton. This new found information added to what we already know. The regime not only released billions of dollars it was holding in escrow in American banks, but secretly sent a plane load of $14 billion in cash. It dropped sanctions and did not, according to Obama, ask for a prisoner swap, though some Americans were released, one was not. The Iranians weren't even required to give up all of their centrifuges or allow for unscheduled inspections. Military bases were off limits altogether for inspection. Finally we have learned after the deal Kerry traveled all over Europe encouraging European companies to do business with Iran. If you think Iran has halted its quest for nuclear weapons, then you probably believed that if you liked your doctor, you could keep your doctor and if you liked your health insurance plan, you could keep your health insurance plan. It also continues missile development using technology that it has obtained from China via Bill Clinton's traitorous approval allowing missile guidance guidance technology to be sold to the Red Chinese Army (for $20 million of illegal campaign donations) and it continues to support Bashar Assad in Syria and terrorist organizations Hezbollah as well as those in Palestine.
This is the sixth year of blogging and I appreciate your support. Continue to pass these onto your friends.
President Trump has offered an amazing tax reform plan. Details are not totally clear yet. but what is known seems great as it will prevent the government from confiscation of the hard earned money from the middle class and will promote and increase jobs. Importantly it will allow corporations to repatriate trillions of dollars, that can be used to expand business, create more jobs, and reward shareholders with buybacks and dividends. Workers will get raises in some instances and so not only with they take home more because of a raise, but also more because taxes will be less. The business tax rate including Subchapter S Corporations at 15% It keeps the mortgage and charitable deductions. Rates would be 10%, 25, and 35%, though the income levels have not be released. Interesting the plan does away with deductions for local and state taxes. Screw you New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and California you should have voted for President Trump. He has doubled the personal deduction and done away with the alternative minimum tax. Stupid Harpy, Nancy Pelosi, has already panned the plan although she hasn't even seen it. Maybe she should vote for it so she could find out what's in it like she said about the abomination known as Obamacare. Her typically Democrat propaganda claims its only for the rich and will increase the debt by $5.5 trillion. That bothers her, but Obama increasing the debt by more than $10 trillion was okay. Chucky Schumer also doesn't like it as well, same propaganda. It would be nice to hear politicians talk about cutting the size and cost of government. The President is trying to make government more efficient as any businessman would about his business.
This is the sixth year of blogging and I appreciate your support. Continue to pass these onto your friends.
Sunday, April 23, 2017
High Crimes and Hypocrisy
Now that Justice Neil Gorsuch has been sworn in as an associate justice of the US Supreme Court, the Democrat hypocrisy affecting his Senate confirmation is a thing of the past and only worth talking about from the sense that when Harry Reid was Majority Leader of the Senate, he turned the rules on its head and so it is only appropriate that the Democrats got some of their own medicine. In my lifetime only a two nominees were voted down, Clement Haynesworth and G. Harold Carswell, both Nixon nominees. At least a half dozen were rejected prior to a vote, most notable Robert Bork, a Reagen nominee. Democrats were upset that the Republican controlled Senate did not give Obama nominee Merrick Garland a hearing to replace Antonin Scalia who may have died under uncertain circumstances. Prior to the 1992 presidential election, Joe Biden, chairman of the senate judicial committee, in an impassioned speech, said that if a justice resigned during the summer of an election year, no one should be nominated until after the elections. Again Democrat hypocrisy rears its ugly head. Control of the Senate flipped during the past eight years and now the Republicans adopted what was termed the "Biden Rule." The 2016 presidential election was also about the Supreme Court as Donald Trump had released a list of potential choices during the campaign.
I hope I am not being too repetitious when I want to reiterate what is going on with Susan Rice. Since joining government, despite being positions that were to be unpolitical, Rice has always been very political. She first served in various capacities with the NSC during the Clinton administration where she began her career of provarication and obscuration. During the genocide being carried out in Rwanda, she advised to condemn it, but not to call it genocide as Clinton was planning not to do anything of substance about it and that it may affect up coming elections. A few years later, she was rewarded by the Clinton regime, being appointed as Assistant Secretary of African Affairs in 1995. In this position she, Madeline Albright, and Assistant Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, prevented our dealing with Sudan in 1997, when they wanted to turn over their intelligence on Osama Ben Ladin, as he had lived in Suden until 1995 until he was expelled. They did not want the CIA and FBI talking to one another. Though Rice was involved, it was Gorelick who had been stupidly appointed to the 911 Commission, who lied about not allowing FBI and CIA to talk, protecting the Clinton Regime.
She launched a brief limited successful career after Bush was elected. In 2008, she abandoned Clinton and became a Senior Policy Advisor to the Obama campaign, a position she has held with the John Kerry campaign. After Obama was elected, she was named Ambassador to the UN. Willing to do and say anything, she was marched out on six Sunday news shows after the attack and slaughter of four Americans at Benghazi. She knowingly lied that the consulate attack was part of a spontaneous demonstration over an obscure anti Muslim video and that Al Qaeda was on the run. This was done to support Obama's run for a second presidential term in 2012. As a reward, she wanted to become Secretary of State to replace HRC, but having become such a controversial person, he appointed her as a National Security Advisor, a position that did not require Senate confirmation.
In her new position, Susan Rice continued to support the Obama regime politically spreading lies and shielding Obama from any criticism. After imposing a "red line" in Syria and failing to act when Assad gassed his own people, and then failing to act, Rice, Kerry, and Obama stressed that all of the stores of gas had been removed through diplomacy. As we have learned, this was obviously not true. In addition, she and her NSA advisor Ben Rhodes also emphasized the success of the Iran deal even though we all know to the contrary. During the selling of the nuclear agreement, she was sent to Israel and attacked Netanyahu with aggressive rhetoric and continue Obama's ill founded and hateful policy to Israel.
Now we have learned that Rice's position was a National Security Advisor was purely political, making certain that Obama's potential political enemies were surveilled and intel information reported back to Obama and leaked when it could be damaging. And if Rice did not personally leaked the material, her assistant Bed Rhodes, surly did. Russian influence on the election was used as a cover for the surveillance and as an excuse for HRC's loss. Normally the names of American citizens incidentally picked up in foreign surveillance are redacted and only unmasked if absolutely necessary for security purposes. Unmasking is very infrequent, but as it turns out, Rice requested unmasking of a number of Trump's campaign and post campaign associates. Though she may be able to get away with the unmasking, as she is already saying it was to understand the documents she was reading, leaking of those names is serious felony and the name of Trump's first choice to run the NSA, General Flynn.
Democrats rarely show any foresight into their policies and actions. Calling for the Russia investigation with our elections is going to bite them in the ass. There is no evidence that President Trump or any of his team colluded with the Russians over the election and yet now the Rice, Rhoades, Jarrett, and Obama surveillance crimes will be investigated and someone may go to prison. It will be fun to see who is going to sacrifice prison time to save Obama's ass.
I hope I am not being too repetitious when I want to reiterate what is going on with Susan Rice. Since joining government, despite being positions that were to be unpolitical, Rice has always been very political. She first served in various capacities with the NSC during the Clinton administration where she began her career of provarication and obscuration. During the genocide being carried out in Rwanda, she advised to condemn it, but not to call it genocide as Clinton was planning not to do anything of substance about it and that it may affect up coming elections. A few years later, she was rewarded by the Clinton regime, being appointed as Assistant Secretary of African Affairs in 1995. In this position she, Madeline Albright, and Assistant Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, prevented our dealing with Sudan in 1997, when they wanted to turn over their intelligence on Osama Ben Ladin, as he had lived in Suden until 1995 until he was expelled. They did not want the CIA and FBI talking to one another. Though Rice was involved, it was Gorelick who had been stupidly appointed to the 911 Commission, who lied about not allowing FBI and CIA to talk, protecting the Clinton Regime.
In her new position, Susan Rice continued to support the Obama regime politically spreading lies and shielding Obama from any criticism. After imposing a "red line" in Syria and failing to act when Assad gassed his own people, and then failing to act, Rice, Kerry, and Obama stressed that all of the stores of gas had been removed through diplomacy. As we have learned, this was obviously not true. In addition, she and her NSA advisor Ben Rhodes also emphasized the success of the Iran deal even though we all know to the contrary. During the selling of the nuclear agreement, she was sent to Israel and attacked Netanyahu with aggressive rhetoric and continue Obama's ill founded and hateful policy to Israel.
Democrats rarely show any foresight into their policies and actions. Calling for the Russia investigation with our elections is going to bite them in the ass. There is no evidence that President Trump or any of his team colluded with the Russians over the election and yet now the Rice, Rhoades, Jarrett, and Obama surveillance crimes will be investigated and someone may go to prison. It will be fun to see who is going to sacrifice prison time to save Obama's ass.
Tuesday, April 4, 2017
Democrat Hypocrisy Part 2
Probably the most obvious and important example of recent Democratl hypocrisy is the ridiculous hoopla over Russian's interfering with our 2016 presidential election. As we are well aware, Democrats still can't believe that HRC lost, despite the fact that she was a horrible candidate, who ran a pathetically out of date and out of touch campaign, with no real plan for the future except vote for me, I'm a woman. Hacking by ? turned up some very revealing information about her and those involved with her campaign. During the primaries, Democrat Party operatives, who were supposed to stay neutral, cheated by aiding her campaign against Bernie Sanders. This knowledge certainly alienated some Sanders supporters who may not have voted for HRC or Trump, but decided to stay home election day or vote for a third party candidate. Revealing emails from HRC's campaign manager, John Podesta, also gave voters insight into the candidates feelings about the "little" people whose vote she sought. Rather than fight this damaging information, the Clinton campaign decided to attack the messenger, since they could not really attack the message. Though the messenger in most cases was Wikileaks, HRC tried to blame the Russians. If Donna Brazille, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, John Podesta, and other Clinton operatives had not done or said what they did, there would have been nothing for Wikileaks or anyone else to report. Voters don't like liars, cheats, and criminal activity. HRC could never get out from under the Benghazi coverup, the corrupt Clinton Foundation, and her stupid comments about "deplorables" and coal miners. Her support for President Obama's policies including Obamacare, high taxes, and anti business and Wall Street speeches didn't help her either.
After Trump won the election, in an effort to delegitimize the Trump Presidency, the Democrats continued on this shameful lie of Russian interference, as if it made any difference at all. All the intelligence agencies were quick to reply that the voting process was not interfered with and Democrat attempts at recounts were totally unsuccessful. George Soros trying to fix the vote has more credibility. They then attacked the electoral process, whereas electors, not voters decide the presidential election. This has been part of our Constitution for 200 years and that many presidents have won with less than 50% of the vote. The electors were put into the Constitution for a purpose, to give importance to all states and voters, otherwise campaigning in a half a dozen or so large states would be all that was necessary. Voters only get one shot and if there is a tie or no one gets a majority of voters, the House of Representatives decides happened in the election of 1800 when after 3 dozen ballots on the HOR, Jefferson was selected over Aaron Burr.
Despite controlling both houses of Congress and the Presidency, the Republicans have stupidly let the Democrats dictate investigations into Russian involvement with Trump and his team. The Republicans should have said okay, we will also investigate the Clinton campaign including the selling of US Uranium to the Russians for a $145 million contribution through a shell Canadian charity to the Clinton Foundation and hacking of the illegal server. Should they also investigate Obama was his comments on an open mike to Russian President Medvedev about having more leeway after the election. The Democrats have called for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself, though I didn't hear any of this for Loretta Lynch, when her clandestine meeting with Bill Clinton on an Arizona airport tarmac. Lynch, a Clinton appointee as a government prosecutor, appeared as a minimum to have a conflict of interest. No investigation was requested, despite the serious criminal and traitorous activity that was reported by the FBI investigation. No one who heard Director James Comey's presentation, could deny that the fix was in. There was no call to investigate the Russians for hacking HRC's illegal State Department server. In fact the Democrats tried to prevent any investigation.
The Democrats are even calling for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate President Trump and a number of his appointees. It must be noted that despite very serious scandals during the Obama regime, no special prosecutors were allowed. The Justice Department, headed by the corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder, was even permitted to investigate itself over the "fast and furious" debacle. Naturally nothing ever came of that investigation even though several murders in the United States, including one of a border agent, were traced to weapons involved in the scandal. none were appointed for Benghazi, IRS, the VA, the $6 billion missing from the Clinton State Department, and crony capitalism for grants to failing companies of Obama campaign financial supporters and bundlers. We can even go back to the second Clinton regime, where Janet Reno protected scumbag Terry McAuliff from a senate investigation into organizing a union sponsored money laundering scheme to fund the Clinton reelection. Union officials went to jail, but McAuliff wasn't even questioned. I doubt if a real investigation of McAuliffe was carried out by Reno's DOJ.
Now it seems like the Democrats have opened up a can of worms that may come to involve Obama and ranking members of his regime in serious criminal activity. President Trump was seriously criticized for claiming that the Obama regime tapped his phones, but although his phones were not necessarily tapped, it is obvious that surveillance was performed of the incoming President and his appointees starting a year before the actual election. First we learned that Mike Flynn, who was selected to head the NSA, had conversations with the Russians. He was fired by Trump, not for the communications, but lying to VP Pence about it. How did that information make its way to the media is something the Democrats are trying to ignore. As we have learned in the last few days, it seems that unmasking of US citizens who just happen to be President Trump and his appointees and associates, has been on going by the Obama regime. I won't speculate on the legality of this, though the leaking of General Flynn's name to the media is a felony. Although she has previously denied any knowledge of unmasking, lying political hack, Susan Rice has been definitely identified as specifically requested the unmasking of Trump and his associates and keeping and possibly disseminating a spread sheet of their phone calls.. When this is analyzed with the comments that Rep. Devon Nunes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has stated that the surveillance material that he reviewed was not about Russia and of low intelligence value, it may have been the Obama regime's method of getting around FISA regulations. Former Obama StateDepartment official Evelyn Farkas admitted on MSNBC that intelligence needed to be gathered on the future Trump administration. Just before leaving the White House Obama eased regulations protecting American citizens. NSA info could be passed on to all of the other intelligence agencies. Now we know why. The question now is whether Susan Rice will fall on her sword to protect Obama or give up him and other high ranking official within the regime. We all know of her loyalty to Obama, who rewarded her with a promotion to the NSA after she lied about Benghazi and continued to lie about Beau Bergdahl. Though the investigation of President Trump and his appointees' relationship to Russia will turn up nothing that will matter, we don't hear anything from the Democrats about investigating Obama's spying on the Trump campaign and transition. The leaker or leakers could spend considerable time in prison. One name that comes to mind is another liar and man without morals, Ben Rhodes, Rice's assistant at the NSA.
Lastly we have learned that perpetual scum bag Terry McAuliff has raised his ugly head again and may have bought the assistant FBI director Andrew McCabe. McCabe's wife, a Democrat, was running for the Virginia state senate in 2016 and McAuliff, a key Clinton crony, arranged for $700K to be given to her campaign. With that kind of money it would have been appropriate for McCabe to recuse himself from any investigation involving the Trump team, especially as he has done so when investigations involved Virginia politicians. Instead he apparently paid for a fake dossier on Trump that British agent Christopher Steele collected. The dossier was so inaccurate and untrue that when it was leaked to the media, only Buzzfeed.com published it.
In my opinion, the investigation will uncover no important information about President Trump and his administration in regard to collision with Russia, though Democrats and the mainstream media will continue to try to make something out of nothing. Instead, we will learn that Obama and his surrogates illegally spied on the Trump campaign and transition and illegally leaked their information. Who goes to prison is still in question.
Next blog will be my take on Democrat hypocrisy in the nomination and confirmation of Judge Gorsuch.
Despite controlling both houses of Congress and the Presidency, the Republicans have stupidly let the Democrats dictate investigations into Russian involvement with Trump and his team. The Republicans should have said okay, we will also investigate the Clinton campaign including the selling of US Uranium to the Russians for a $145 million contribution through a shell Canadian charity to the Clinton Foundation and hacking of the illegal server. Should they also investigate Obama was his comments on an open mike to Russian President Medvedev about having more leeway after the election. The Democrats have called for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself, though I didn't hear any of this for Loretta Lynch, when her clandestine meeting with Bill Clinton on an Arizona airport tarmac. Lynch, a Clinton appointee as a government prosecutor, appeared as a minimum to have a conflict of interest. No investigation was requested, despite the serious criminal and traitorous activity that was reported by the FBI investigation. No one who heard Director James Comey's presentation, could deny that the fix was in. There was no call to investigate the Russians for hacking HRC's illegal State Department server. In fact the Democrats tried to prevent any investigation.
The Democrats are even calling for a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate President Trump and a number of his appointees. It must be noted that despite very serious scandals during the Obama regime, no special prosecutors were allowed. The Justice Department, headed by the corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder, was even permitted to investigate itself over the "fast and furious" debacle. Naturally nothing ever came of that investigation even though several murders in the United States, including one of a border agent, were traced to weapons involved in the scandal. none were appointed for Benghazi, IRS, the VA, the $6 billion missing from the Clinton State Department, and crony capitalism for grants to failing companies of Obama campaign financial supporters and bundlers. We can even go back to the second Clinton regime, where Janet Reno protected scumbag Terry McAuliff from a senate investigation into organizing a union sponsored money laundering scheme to fund the Clinton reelection. Union officials went to jail, but McAuliff wasn't even questioned. I doubt if a real investigation of McAuliffe was carried out by Reno's DOJ.
Now it seems like the Democrats have opened up a can of worms that may come to involve Obama and ranking members of his regime in serious criminal activity. President Trump was seriously criticized for claiming that the Obama regime tapped his phones, but although his phones were not necessarily tapped, it is obvious that surveillance was performed of the incoming President and his appointees starting a year before the actual election. First we learned that Mike Flynn, who was selected to head the NSA, had conversations with the Russians. He was fired by Trump, not for the communications, but lying to VP Pence about it. How did that information make its way to the media is something the Democrats are trying to ignore. As we have learned in the last few days, it seems that unmasking of US citizens who just happen to be President Trump and his appointees and associates, has been on going by the Obama regime. I won't speculate on the legality of this, though the leaking of General Flynn's name to the media is a felony. Although she has previously denied any knowledge of unmasking, lying political hack, Susan Rice has been definitely identified as specifically requested the unmasking of Trump and his associates and keeping and possibly disseminating a spread sheet of their phone calls.. When this is analyzed with the comments that Rep. Devon Nunes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has stated that the surveillance material that he reviewed was not about Russia and of low intelligence value, it may have been the Obama regime's method of getting around FISA regulations. Former Obama StateDepartment official Evelyn Farkas admitted on MSNBC that intelligence needed to be gathered on the future Trump administration. Just before leaving the White House Obama eased regulations protecting American citizens. NSA info could be passed on to all of the other intelligence agencies. Now we know why. The question now is whether Susan Rice will fall on her sword to protect Obama or give up him and other high ranking official within the regime. We all know of her loyalty to Obama, who rewarded her with a promotion to the NSA after she lied about Benghazi and continued to lie about Beau Bergdahl. Though the investigation of President Trump and his appointees' relationship to Russia will turn up nothing that will matter, we don't hear anything from the Democrats about investigating Obama's spying on the Trump campaign and transition. The leaker or leakers could spend considerable time in prison. One name that comes to mind is another liar and man without morals, Ben Rhodes, Rice's assistant at the NSA.
In my opinion, the investigation will uncover no important information about President Trump and his administration in regard to collision with Russia, though Democrats and the mainstream media will continue to try to make something out of nothing. Instead, we will learn that Obama and his surrogates illegally spied on the Trump campaign and transition and illegally leaked their information. Who goes to prison is still in question.
Next blog will be my take on Democrat hypocrisy in the nomination and confirmation of Judge Gorsuch.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)